Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleSystemic Lupus Erythematosus

Hydroxychloroquine Levels throughout Pregnancies Complicated by Rheumatic Disease: Implications for Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes

Stephen J. Balevic, Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez, Amanda M. Eudy, Thomas P. Green, Laura E. Schanberg and Megan E.B. Clowse
The Journal of Rheumatology January 2019, 46 (1) 57-63; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.180158
Stephen J. Balevic
From the departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Duke University, and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stephen J. Balevic
  • For correspondence: Stephen.balevic@duke.edu
Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amanda M. Eudy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas P. Green
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura E. Schanberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Megan E.B. Clowse
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Abstract

Objective. Pregnancies in women with active rheumatic disease often result in poor neonatal outcomes. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) reduces disease activity and flares; however, pregnancy causes significant physiologic changes that may alter HCQ levels and lead to therapeutic failure. Therefore, our objective was to evaluate HCQ concentrations during pregnancy and relate levels to outcomes.

Methods. We performed an observational study of pregnant patients with rheumatic disease who were taking HCQ from a single center during 2013–2016. Serum samples were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Primary HCQ exposure was categorized as nontherapeutic (≤ 100 ng/ml) or therapeutic (> 100 ng/ml). Categorical outcomes were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test and continuous outcomes using linear regression models, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Kruskal-Wallis test, t test, and ANOVA.

Results. We analyzed 145 samples from 50 patients with rheumatic disease, 56% of whom had systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). HCQ concentration varied widely among individuals at each trimester. Mean physician’s global assessment scores in patients with SLE were significantly higher in those with average drug levels ≤ 100 ng/ml compared to > 100 ng/ml (0.93 vs 0.32, p = 0.01). Of patients with SLE, 83% with average drug levels ≤ 100 ng/ml delivered prematurely (n = 6), compared to only 21% with average levels > 100 ng/ml (n = 19; p = 0.01). HCQ levels were not associated with prematurity or disease activity in non-SLE patients.

Conclusion. With both high and low HCQ levels associated with preterm birth and disease activity in SLE, further study is necessary to understand HCQ disposition throughout pregnancy and to clarify the relationship between drug levels and outcomes.

Key Indexing Terms:
  • SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS
  • HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE
  • PREGNANCY

In pregnant women with rheumatic disease, neonatal complications are common and include preterm birth and low birth weight1,2. Poor neonatal outcomes occur in pregnancies complicated by many rheumatic diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis, among others3. Increased maternal disease activity during pregnancy further increases the risk for pregnancy and neonatal complications1,3,4,5. To control disease activity and optimize outcomes, many pregnant women with SLE are treated with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) during pregnancy, because it can reduce disease flare rates and disease activity, allow for lower doses of corticosteroids, and reduce prematurity3,6,7,8.

In nonpregnant populations, low systemic levels of HCQ are associated with increased disease activity, increased risk of disease flares, and therapeutic failure9,10,11,12,13. In clinically inactive patients with SLE, whole blood HCQ levels were the only independent predictors of disease flare, with an increase in drug levels of about 500 ng/ml predicting a 60% decreased risk of subsequent flare9. In addition, SLE patients with very low whole blood HCQ levels (e.g., < 100 ng/ml) are at a high risk for active disease and flares11,14. While whole blood is often the preferred matrix for testing HCQ concentration, serum matrices have also been studied in SLE10. For example, SLE patients with inactive disease trended toward lower disease activity scores and reduced incidence of flares when serum HCQ levels were > 500 ng/ml10.

Despite the importance of maintaining adequate HCQ exposure, drug levels during pregnancy have not been systematically studied. Similar doses of HCQ in nonpregnant patients result in differing levels owing to high inter-individual variability9,15. The variability may be due to several features such as elevated body mass index, medication nonadherence, and increased renal clearance, all of which have been associated with low HCQ levels in nonpregnant SLE populations16. Physiologic changes in pregnancy, including dramatic increases in the volume of distribution17, may cause additional changes in drug disposition. However, it is currently unknown whether low HCQ drug levels occur during pregnancy and whether lower drug levels correlate with outcomes. To close this knowledge gap, we performed an observational analysis of a registry of pregnant women with rheumatic diseases to identify HCQ levels throughout pregnancy and to study the effect of low drug levels on maternal disease activity and neonatal outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design

This was an analysis of data collected through the Duke Autoimmunity in Pregnancy (DAP) registry, which prospectively collects biospecimens and clinical data. Serum samples from study participants were sent to a laboratory for measurement of HCQ level using validated high-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. The study was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The Duke institutional review board approved the study protocol (Pro00000775/Pro00000756).

Participants

From November 2013 to December 2016, patients with rheumatic disease taking HCQ prior to pregnancy were identified from the DAP registry, and serum samples were analyzed if patients continued HCQ longitudinally throughout pregnancy and provided at least 1 blood sample. Women with multiple births were excluded owing to the confounding risk of preterm birth and pregnancy complications. All included patients consented to having research blood collected.

Data collection

Registry study visits occur, on average, 2–3 times during pregnancy and once after delivery. For SLE patients, disease activity was measured by 1 rheumatologist (MEC) using the physician’s global assessment (PGA) and the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Pregnancy Disease Activity Index (SLEPDAI)18. The PGA for SLE is a visual analog scale ranging from 0 cm (no disease activity) to 3 cm (severe disease activity), with extensive use as a reliable outcome measure in SLE pregnancies19,20,21,22. In patients without SLE, disease activity was measured by the same rheumatologist (MEC) using the PGA, adjusted to represent a visual analog scale ranging from 0 mm (no disease activity) to 100 mm (highest activity). Exploratory measures of SLE disease activity included complement levels (C3/C4) and anti-dsDNA antibody levels. For analysis of neonatal outcomes, neonatal gestational age at birth was the primary outcome21, with preterm birth (< 37 weeks) and birth weight as secondary outcomes.

HCQ definitions

Based on previous literature, our primary analyses categorized the HCQ level as nontherapeutic (≤ 100 ng/ml)9,11 and therapeutic (> 100 ng/ml). In exploratory analyses, the therapeutic category was further categorized into suboptimal (101–500 ng/ml), or optimal (> 500 ng/ml)10,23.

Patient perspective of HCQ adherence during pregnancy

Five patient representatives from the DAP Registry Patient Advisors and Collaborators (DAPPAC) were asked what percentage of women with SLE in pregnancy they estimated did not take prescribed HCQ reliably.

Statistical analysis

For HCQ during pregnancy, mean and median HCQ levels by trimester were measured by ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test, respectively, with undetectable drug levels (< 10 ng/ml) imputed as 5 ng/ml. Mean drug levels by year were measured by ANOVA. Differences in use of concomitant medications across categorical HCQ levels were measured using Fisher’s exact test.

For neonatal outcomes, the difference in median gestational age at birth and birth weight by average categorical HCQ level during pregnancy was determined using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (2 groups) or the Kruskal-Wallis test (3 groups). Differences in the prevalence of preterm birth by average HCQ level category were determined using Fisher’s exact test. Nonlive births were excluded from neonatal outcome analyses. The association of pregnancy average maternal PGA and neonatal gestational age was estimated by unadjusted linear regression models.

For maternal disease activity, the effect of average HCQ levels on disease activity was analyzed using ANOVA, t test, and unadjusted linear regression models. The effect of HCQ level on C3, C4, and dsDNA was analyzed using unadjusted linear regression models per 100 ng/ml increases in HCQ level. For patients with SLE, disease activity was characterized as low (PGA ≤ 1) or high (PGA > 1). For patients without SLE, disease activity was characterized as low (PGA ≤ 25 mm) or high (PGA > 25 mm). All analyses were performed in SAS 9.4.

RESULTS

Demographics and samples

Fifty patients with 145 serum samples were included in the study (Table 1). The majority of patients had SLE (56%). Six samples (4%) were below the limit of quantitation (< 10 ng/ml). At some point during pregnancy, 28% of patients took concomitant prednisone, with an average dose recorded at each visit of 16.7 mg, while 18% took concomitant azathioprine (AZA). The most common total daily HCQ dose was 400 mg, while the median weight-based dose was 5.1 mg/kg (IQR 4.3–5.5). Because of weight gain, 1 patient had HCQ dosage increased during pregnancy.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Clinical characteristics (n = 50).

Of subjects with SLE and available testing, 18 (64.3%) were Ro-positive, 7 (25%) were La-positive, and 12 (44.4%) were RNP-positive. No subjects had antiphospholipid antibody syndrome or triple antiphospholipid antibody positivity; 1 subject (3.8%) had a positive β2-glycoprotein IgM or IgG, 1 subject (3.7%) was positive for anticardiolipin IgM or IgG, and 1 subject (3.8%) was positive for lupus anticoagulant. Seven subjects (25%) had a history of confirmed or suspected lupus nephritis (LN); 3 of whom (10.7%) had active nephritis during pregnancy. The highest observed creatinine for any subject during pregnancy was 1 mg/dl.

HCQ matrix stability

No sample degradation occurred over time. For the most common dosing (400 mg), the mean HCQ level (± SD) was 420 ng/ml in 2013 (n = 1), 412 ng/ml (286) in 2014 (n = 44), 377 ng/ml (198) in 2015 (n = 42), and 355 ng/ml (229) in 2016 (n = 40, p = 0.7).

HCQ levels during pregnancy

There was significant variability in serum HCQ concentrations among individuals, resulting in a wide range of concentrations at all doses and at each trimester (Table 2). The median HCQ level for patients taking the same dose (400 mg) during pregnancy did not differ between those with SLE (355 ng/ml) and without it (345 ng/ml, p = 0.8). Twelve of 50 patients (24%) had at least 1 HCQ level ≤ 100 ng/ml during pregnancy, suggesting HCQ nonadherence. Seven of these women had average HCQ levels ≤ 100 ng/ml throughout pregnancy.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

HCQ levels throughout pregnancy.

Patient perspective of HCQ adherence during pregnancy

The women in the DAPPAC predicted poor adherence in the study population, estimating that 20% of women with SLE would not be taking HCQ, 30% would be taking it inconsistently, and only 50% would be taking it reliably.

Neonatal outcomes

There were 2 neonatal losses (1 mother with autoimmune hepatitis and 1 with SLE) and 2 pregnancies with unknown neonatal outcomes (both mothers with SLE); resulting in 46 total live births with known outcomes (25 SLE and 21 non-SLE). Among the pregnancies in women with SLE, those with average drug levels ≤ 100 ng/ml had a higher frequency of preterm delivery (p = 0.01) and lower gestational ages at birth than those with levels > 100 ng/ml (p = 0.03; Table 3). Neonatal outcomes in women without SLE did not significantly differ based on HCQ level.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Neonatal outcomes* by average HCQ level.

When drug levels were further stratified, the median neonatal gestational age in patients with SLE was highest in subjects with average HCQ levels 101–500 ng/ml (Table 3). Among 5 women with SLE and HCQ > 500 ng/ml, 4 delivered preterm. There was no linear association between gestational age and average HCQ level as a continuous variable.

For patients with SLE, neonatal gestational age was significantly lower in mothers with high disease activity compared to those with low disease activity, median (IQR) 29.5 (27–30) weeks versus 38 (37–39) weeks, respectively (p = 0.002). When PGA was analyzed as a continuous variable, neonatal gestational age decreased by 4.9 weeks for every 1 unit increase in average PGA (p < 0.0001, R2 = 0.5). However, in non-SLE patients, disease activity was not associated with neonatal gestational age.

Of the mothers with active LN during pregnancy (n = 3), all infants were born ≤ 30 weeks. Two of these pregnancies had an average HCQ level ≤ 100 ng/ml while 1 had an average HCQ level > 500 ng/ml. Of the mothers with a history of proven or suspected LN that was not active during pregnancy (n = 4), one delivered at 25 weeks while the remainder delivered at ≥ 36 weeks.

Maternal disease activity by HCQ level

SLE patients with average HCQ ≤ 100 ng/ml had higher disease activity compared to those with average HCQ > 100 ng/ml, with an average PGA of 0.93 versus 0.32, respectively (p = 0.01; Figure 1). There was no significant difference between disease activity and HCQ level in non-SLE patients.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity by hydroxychloroquine level.

When drug levels were further stratified, the average PGA was lowest in SLE patients with average drug levels 101–500 ng/ml (0.23 ± SD 0.35, n = 16) compared to those with > 500 ng/ml (0.56 ± SD 0.65, n = 6) and ≤ 100 ng/ml (0.93 ± SD 0.65, n = 6; p = 0.02). When drug levels were analyzed as a continuous variable, the average SLE PGA decreased by 0.01 for every 100 ng/ml increase in HCQ (p < 0.0001), however, the correlation was weak (R2 = 0.07; Appendix 1).

There was no association between HCQ level and SLEPDAI, or between HCQ level and C3, C4, and dsDNA antibody.

Concomitant medications

Concomitant use of AZA was higher in SLE subjects with average HCQ > 500 ng/ml (n = 5, 83.3%) compared to those with HCQ 101–500 ng/ml (n = 2, 12.5%) and HCQ ≤ 100 ng/ml (n = 1, 16.7%; p = 0.006). Otherwise, prednisone use was not significantly different among SLE groups. Among non-SLE subjects, there was no significant difference in AZA or prednisone use by categorical HCQ levels.

Pregnancy complications

Eight SLE mothers with preterm deliveries were induced because of pregnancy complications; 4 of these mothers had average HCQ levels ≤ 100 ng/ml and 4 had average HCQ > 500 ng/ml. The most common pregnancy complications leading to induction in SLE were maternal hypertension or preeclampsia (n = 7), infant not being well (n = 4), and maternal disease activity (n = 3). Other rare complications included cholestasis (n = 1) and pericardial effusion (n = 1). No mothers without SLE required a preterm induction of labor.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, we present the first longitudinal study of HCQ drug levels during pregnancy. Very low HCQ levels consistent with nonadherence (≤ 100 ng/ml) were found in 24% of pregnancies, with 14% having average levels persistently low. This finding is highly consistent with estimates of nonadherence (about 1 in 5) observed using HCQ blood levels in a prospective international study24, as well as our patient estimates of adherence. We observed a high frequency of preterm birth and lower neonatal gestational ages in women with SLE and either HCQ ≤ 100 ng/ml or > 500 ng/ml. Otherwise, in women without SLE, the HCQ level did not clearly correlate with neonatal outcomes. In addition, our study confirmed the significant relationship between high maternal disease activity in SLE and lower neonatal gestational age. All the severely preterm births (≤ 30 weeks) occurred in SLE patients with high disease activity.

Mothers with SLE have a higher risk for poor neonatal outcomes compared to other rheumatic diseases; therefore, we analyzed neonatal outcomes separately in SLE and non-SLE patients. We found that SLE patients with very low HCQ levels (≤ 100 ng/ml) had more preterm births and babies born at a lower gestational age than those with HCQ levels > 100 ng/ml. Because we observed the highest neonatal gestational age in SLE groups with the lowest disease activity and fewest pregnancy complications, the higher preterm delivery in patients with SLE may be related to disease activity. For example, 2 out of the 3 mothers with active LN had average drug levels ≤ 100 ng/ml and severe preterm births. Alternatively, low drug levels may be associated with other factors (e.g., poor medication and healthcare adherence)11 that could also contribute to preterm birth. Although using different assays, most studies define nonadherence as whole blood HCQ levels < 100–200 ng/ml14,24,25,26. Because low HCQ levels likely identify severe nonadherence24, identifying medication nonadherence becomes critical to patient management by affording the opportunity to improve adherence through counseling. For example, in the Hopkins Lupus Cohort, only 56% of patients were completely adherent with HCQ at baseline, and through routine check of medication levels and counseling, adherence increased to 80%23. Poor medication adherence in subjects with SLE has also been associated with depression and emergency room visits27,28. Therefore, with additional data, there may be a future role for serum HCQ drug monitoring during pregnancy to identify SLE mothers nonadherent with HCQ.

We also observed a high rate of preterm birth among women with SLE and HCQ > 500 ng/ml, likely because of concurrent medical complications during pregnancy. AZA use was also more common in SLE subjects with average HCQ > 500 ng/ml, which may be a marker for baseline disease severity. The pregnancy with the highest HCQ level delivered at 25 weeks because of active SLE and LN in the setting of placental abruption and severe HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets). Two additional pregnancies with average HCQ > 500 ng/ml and LN delivered at 29 weeks (nephritis active during pregnancy) and 36 weeks (nephritis not active during pregnancy). Conversely, the other 2 SLE patients with average HCQ levels > 500 ng/ml and no history of nephritis delivered at 35 weeks and 37 weeks. This underscores that preterm birth in SLE is multifactorial. Because sample sizes were low within subgroups (e.g., HCQ levels ≤ 100 ng/ml and > 500 ng/ml), an outlier effect is also possible. While we considered the possibility of a direct negative effect of HCQ on birth outcomes at high drug levels, we reassuringly did not observe a higher incidence of preterm birth in non-SLE patients with drug levels > 500 ng/ml. Overall, HCQ levels were not associated with neonatal outcomes in non-SLE patients. The lack of association in non-SLE patients is likely because of heterogeneity in underlying disease in this subgroup, whereby HCQ may not have contributed equally to disease control.

Defining an optimal “therapeutic window” for HCQ levels remains challenging. First, the use of different matrices (e.g., whole blood vs serum) limits comparisons of drug levels between studies. Second, HCQ has several pharmacodynamic effects, including altering antigen presentation and MHC class II expression, reduced cytokine production and lymphocyte proliferation, and control of toll-like receptors, among others15. It is likely that these effects are mediated at different HCQ concentrations, and further, differences in disease phenotypes and severity may also dictate response to HCQ at a given level. Despite these limitations, studies confirm an exposure-response relationship between HCQ levels and rheumatic disease activity. For example, 1 study found that in SLE patients without active disease at baseline, those who had subsequent disease flares had lower mean whole blood HCQ levels at baseline (703 ± 534 ng/ml) compared to those who did not have flares (1128 ± 507 ng/ml)9,11. This study defined an optimal whole blood HCQ level as ≥ 1000 ng/ml; however, a subsequent clinical trial targeting HCQ levels ≥ 1000 ng/ml did not reduce flare rates except in a subset without early flares who maintained target levels throughout followup29. Other studies further support a relationship between whole blood HCQ levels, cutaneous SLE activity30, and SLE Disease Activity Index25. In our study of pregnant women, we found significant associations between drug levels and disease activity in SLE patients, with the highest disease activity observed in those with drug levels ≤ 100 ng/ml and the lowest disease activity with drug levels between 101–500 ng/ml. However, because of lower sample sizes within subgroups and possible outliers, further investigation is necessary to characterize the exposure-response relationship of HCQ in SLE pregnancies. We also did not observe an association between HCQ levels and either SLEPDAI or biomarkers of SLE disease activity; the latter observation may be due to heterogeneity in SLE phenotypes, whereby not all subjects manifested active disease by a change in biomarkers.

There are several potential limitations with our study, including the sample matrix. Although our assay was validated only for frozen serum samples ≤ 12 months of age, our data suggest no significant sample degradation occurred. Further, while whole blood testing for HCQ has historically been considered more precise11, whole blood was not available in the DAP registry. However, generalization is possible with other cohorts that have used serum HCQ assays10. In addition, red blood cells, platelets, and leukocytes sequester HCQ16,25,31. As a result, whole blood measurements quantify HCQ concentration in these cells as well as the bound and unbound (biologically active) drug in the vascular compartment. Therefore, cytopenias from SLE may reduce the effective “compartment size” for HCQ and potentially lower whole blood concentrations of HCQ. Serum measurements, which quantify only the bound and unbound drug in the vascular space, may be less prone to confounding from cytopenias in active rheumatic diseases, or from the physiologic anemia of pregnancy. As an example, tacrolimus, which also partitions into red blood cells, can become supratherapeutic when whole blood drug levels instead of plasma (or unbound drug) levels are adjusted to maintain target concentrations during pregnancy32.

Several assumptions were necessary for our analysis. We enrolled individuals taking HCQ prior to pregnancy, assuming they were at steady-state concentration. On review of available medical records, we confirmed that over half were taking HCQ for > 1 year, with only 4 participants taking HCQ < 3 months. It is possible some participants were not reliably taking the prescribed dose before or during pregnancy and therefore were not at steady state. While subjects were routinely asked about medication use during physician interview, we did not use a validated tool to directly measure adherence. Further, administration times were not available in the registry, precluding the ability to account for time effects since last dose in the drug levels. Despite this potential limitation, most studies suggest the within-day and inter-day variability of HCQ levels are small owing to the drug’s long half-life9,13. Although a recent report found HCQ levels were associated with administration time, the magnitude of the effect is unclear25. Lastly, outlier drug levels and suspected medication nonadherence increased variability in drug concentrations.

Observational studies have inherent design limitations, including confounding. We observed that maternal disease activity was strongly associated with gestational age at delivery in SLE, but because of the low sample sizes within subgroups, we could not stratify drug levels and preterm birth/gestational age at birth by disease activity. Further, it is possible that observed associations between categorical drug exposure and outcomes could represent artifact from the cutoffs chosen for each group. Therefore, future studies should use a larger sample size, stratify by disease activity, and consider using modeling to clarify the relationship between HCQ drug levels, disease activity, and neonatal outcomes.

In this cohort of patients, we observed very low drug levels consistent with nonadherence in almost one-quarter of participants. HCQ levels in women with SLE were associated with the PGA of disease activity, but no other measures of SLE or non-SLE activity. In addition, disease activity and pregnancy complications were significantly associated with preterm birth and low neonatal gestational age in patients with SLE, underscoring the importance of controlling active disease during pregnancy. While drug levels did not correlate with preterm birth in non-SLE patients, both higher and lower HCQ levels were associated with preterm birth and lower neonatal gestational age in women with SLE. The association between HCQ levels and both disease activity and pregnancy outcomes in SLE underscores the importance of further work to understand the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and optimal exposure of HCQ during pregnancy.

APPENDIX 1.

APPENDIX 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
APPENDIX 1.

Disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus per 100 ng/ml hydroxychloroquine increase.

Footnotes

  • Funding for this study was provided by the US National Institute of Child Health and Human Development/National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS/NICHD 2T32GM086330-06), the Derfner Foundation, and Duke Health Private Diagnostic Clinic ENABLE.

  • Accepted for publication July 3, 2018.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    1. Clowse ME
    . Lupus activity in pregnancy. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2007;33:237–52.
  2. 2.
    1. Peart E,
    2. Clowse ME
    . Systemic lupus erythematosus and pregnancy outcomes: an update and review of the literature. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2014;26:118–23.
  3. 3.
    1. Østensen M,
    2. Andreoli L,
    3. Brucato A,
    4. Cetin I,
    5. Chambers C,
    6. Clowse ME,
    7. et al.
    State of the art: reproduction and pregnancy in rheumatic diseases. Autoimmun Rev 2015;14:376–86.
  4. 4.
    1. Clowse ME
    . Managing contraception and pregnancy in the rheumatologic diseases. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2010;24:373–85.
  5. 5.
    1. de Man YA,
    2. Hazes JM,
    3. van der Heide H,
    4. Willemsen SP,
    5. de Groot CJ,
    6. Steegers EA,
    7. et al.
    Association of higher rheumatoid arthritis disease activity during pregnancy with lower birth weight: results of a national prospective study. Arthritis Rheum 2009;60:3196–206.
  6. 6.
    1. Levy RA,
    2. Vilela VS,
    3. Cataldo MJ,
    4. Ramos RC,
    5. Duarte JL,
    6. Tura BR,
    7. et al.
    Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in lupus pregnancy: double-blind and placebo-controlled study. Lupus 2001;10:401–4.
  7. 7.
    1. Eudy AM,
    2. Siega-Riz AM,
    3. Engel SM,
    4. Franceschini N,
    5. Howard AG,
    6. Clowse ME,
    7. et al.
    Effect of pregnancy on disease flares in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 2018;77:855–60.
  8. 8.
    1. Leroux M,
    2. Desveaux C,
    3. Parcevaux M,
    4. Julliac B,
    5. Gouyon JB,
    6. Dallay D,
    7. et al.
    Impact of hydroxychloroquine on preterm delivery and intrauterine growth restriction in pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus: a descriptive cohort study. Lupus 2015;24:1384–91.
  9. 9.
    1. Costedoat-Chalumeau N,
    2. Amoura Z,
    3. Hulot JS,
    4. Hammoud HA,
    5. Aymard G,
    6. Cacoub P,
    7. et al.
    Low blood concentration of hydroxychloroquine is a marker for and predictor of disease exacerbations in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:3284–90.
  10. 10.
    1. Mok CC,
    2. Penn HJ,
    3. Chan KL,
    4. Tse SM,
    5. Langman LJ,
    6. Jannetto PJ
    . Hydroxychloroquine serum concentrations and flares of systemic lupus erythematosus: a longitudinal cohort analysis. Arthritis Care Res 2016;68:1295–302.
  11. 11.
    1. Costedoat-Chalumeau N,
    2. Le Guern V,
    3. Piette JC
    . Routine hydroxychloroquine blood concentration measurement in systemic lupus erythematosus reaches adulthood [editorial]. J Rheumatol 2015;42:1997–9.
  12. 12.
    1. Tett SE,
    2. Day RO,
    3. Cutler DJ
    . Concentration-effect relationship of hydroxychloroquine in rheumatoid arthritis—a cross sectional study. J Rheumatol 1993;20:1874–9.
  13. 13.
    1. Tett SE,
    2. Cutler DJ,
    3. Beck C,
    4. Day RO
    . Concentration-effect relationship of hydroxychloroquine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis—a prospective, dose ranging study. J Rheumatol 2000;27:1656–60.
  14. 14.
    1. Costedoat-Chalumeau N,
    2. Amoura Z,
    3. Hulot JS,
    4. Aymard G,
    5. Leroux G,
    6. Marra D,
    7. et al.
    Very low blood hydroxychloroquine concentration as an objective marker of poor adherence to treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 2007;66:821–4.
  15. 15.
    1. Rainsford KD,
    2. Parke AL,
    3. Clifford-Rashotte M,
    4. Kean WF
    . Therapy and pharmacological properties of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis and related diseases. Inflammopharmacology 2015;23:231–69.
  16. 16.
    1. Jallouli M,
    2. Galicier L,
    3. Zahr N,
    4. Aumaitre O,
    5. Frances C,
    6. Le Guern V,
    7. et al;
    8. Plaquenil Lupus Systemic Study Group
    . Determinants of hydroxychloroquine blood concentration variations in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol 2015;67:2176–84.
  17. 17.
    1. Ke AB,
    2. Rostami-Hodjegan A,
    3. Zhao P,
    4. Unadkat JD
    . Pharmacometrics in pregnancy: an unmet need. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2014;54:53–69.
  18. 18.
    1. Buyon JP,
    2. Kalunian KC,
    3. Ramsey-Goldman R,
    4. Petri MA,
    5. Lockshin MD,
    6. Ruiz-Irastorza G,
    7. et al.
    Assessing disease activity in SLE patients during pregnancy. Lupus 1999;8:677–84.
  19. 19.
    1. Petri M,
    2. Howard D,
    3. Repke J,
    4. Goldman DW
    . The Hopkins Lupus Pregnancy Center: 1987–1991 update. Am J Reprod Immunol 1992;28:188–91.
  20. 20.
    1. Petri M,
    2. Howard D,
    3. Repke J
    . Frequency of lupus flare in pregnancy. The Hopkins Lupus Pregnancy Center experience. Arthritis Rheum 1991;34:1538–45.
  21. 21.
    1. Clowse ME,
    2. Magder LS,
    3. Witter F,
    4. Petri M
    . The impact of increased lupus activity on obstetric outcomes. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:514–21.
  22. 22.
    1. Clowse ME,
    2. Magder L,
    3. Witter F,
    4. Petri M
    . Hydroxychloroquine in lupus pregnancy. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:3640–7.
  23. 23.
    1. Durcan L,
    2. Clarke WA,
    3. Magder LS,
    4. Petri M
    . Hydroxychloroquine blood levels in systemic lupus erythematosus: clarifying dosing controversies and improving adherence. J Rheumatol 2015;42:2092–7.
  24. 24.
    1. Costedoat-Chalumeau N,
    2. Houssiau F,
    3. Izmirly P,
    4. Le Guern V,
    5. Navarra S,
    6. Jolly M,
    7. et al.
    A prospective international study on adherence to treatment in 305 patients with flaring SLE: assessment by drug levels and self-administered questionnaires. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2018;103:1074–82.
  25. 25.
    1. Yeon Lee J,
    2. Lee J,
    3. Ki Kwok S,
    4. Hyeon Ju J,
    5. Su Park K,
    6. Park SH
    . Factors related to blood hydroxychloroquine concentration in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res 2017;69:536–42.
  26. 26.
    1. Iudici M,
    2. Pantano I,
    3. Fasano S,
    4. Pierro L,
    5. Charlier B,
    6. Pingeon M,
    7. et al.
    Health status and concomitant prescription of immunosuppressants are risk factors for hydroxychloroquine nonadherence in systemic lupus patients with prolonged inactive disease. Lupus 2018;27:265–72.
  27. 27.
    1. Feldman CH,
    2. Yazdany J,
    3. Guan H,
    4. Solomon DH,
    5. Costenbader KH
    . Medication nonadherence is associated with increased subsequent acute care utilization among Medicaid beneficiaries with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res 2015;67:1712–21.
  28. 28.
    1. Mehat P,
    2. Atiquzzaman M,
    3. Esdaile JM,
    4. Aviña-Zubieta A,
    5. De Vera MA
    . Medication nonadherence in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review. Arthritis Care Res 2017;69:1706–13.
  29. 29.
    1. Costedoat-Chalumeau N,
    2. Galicier L,
    3. Aumaitre O,
    4. Frances C,
    5. Le Guern V,
    6. Liote F,
    7. et al;
    8. Group PLUS
    . Hydroxychloroquine in systemic lupus erythematosus: results of a French multicentre controlled trial (PLUS Study). Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:1786–92.
  30. 30.
    1. Frances C,
    2. Cosnes A,
    3. Duhaut P,
    4. Zahr N,
    5. Soutou B,
    6. Ingen-Housz-Oro S,
    7. et al.
    Low blood concentration of hydroxychloroquine in patients with refractory cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a French multicenter prospective study. Arch Dermatol 2012;148:479–84.
  31. 31.
    1. Browning DJ
    . Pharmacology of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine. In: Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine retinopathy. New York: Springer-Verlag New York; 2014:35–63.
  32. 32.
    1. Hebert MF,
    2. Zheng S,
    3. Hays K,
    4. Shen DD,
    5. Davis CL,
    6. Umans JG,
    7. et al.
    Interpreting tacrolimus concentrations during pregnancy and postpartum. Transplantation 2013;95:908–15.

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire