You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 69, Issue 10
  • Evaluation of the risk of anti-SSA/Ro-SSB/La antibody-associated cardiac manifestations of neonatal lupus in fetuses of mothers with systemic lupus erythematosus exposed to hydroxychloroquine

Article Text

Article menu
Clinical and epidemiological research
Concise report
Evaluation of the risk of anti-SSA/Ro-SSB/La antibody-associated cardiac manifestations of neonatal lupus in fetuses of mothers with systemic lupus erythematosus exposed to hydroxychloroquine
  1. Peter M Izmirly1,
  2. Mimi Y Kim2,
  3. Carolina Llanos1,
  4. Phuong U Le3,
  5. Marta M Guerra3,
  6. Anca D Askanase1,
  7. Jane E Salmon3,
  8. Jill P Buyon1
  1. 1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA
  2. 2Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, USA
  3. 3Department of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, Cornell University Medical School, New York, USA
  1. Correspondence to Peter M Izmirly, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, New York University (NYU) School of Medicine, TH-407, New York, NY 10016, USA; Peter.Izmirly{at}nyumc.org

Abstract

Background Based on the potential involvement of Toll-like receptor (TLR) signalling in the pathogenesis of neonatal lupus (NL), it was hypothesised that fetal exposure to hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), a TLR inhibitor, might reduce the risk of anti-SSA/Ro/SSB/La antibody-associated cardiac manifestations of NL (cardiac-NL).

Methods Cardiac-NL children (N=50) and controls (N=151) were drawn from the following overlapping pregnancy studies: Research Registry for NL; PR Interval and Dexamethasone Evaluation in Cardiac-NL; and Predictors of Pregnancy Outcomes: Biomarkers in Antiphospholipid Syndrome and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Pregnancies met the following inclusion criteria: documentation of maternal anti-SSA/Ro/SSB/La antibodies at pregnancy, confirmation of medication use and child's outcome, a diagnosis of SLE before pregnancy and birth by 31 December 2007.

Results Seven (14%) of the cardiac-NL children were exposed to HCQ compared with 56 (37%) of the controls (p=0.002; OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.63). Cases and controls were similar with respect to demographic and antibody status. Multivariable analysis adjusting for birth year, maternal race/ethnicity, antibody status, non-fluorinated steroid use and prior cardiac-NL risk yielded an OR associated with HCQ use of 0.46 (95% CI 0.18 to 1.18; p=0.10).

Conclusion This case–control study suggests that, in mothers with SLE with anti-SSA/Ro/SSB/La antibodies, exposure to HCQ during pregnancy may decrease the risk of fetal development of cardiac-NL. Prospective studies are needed for confirmation.

https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.119263

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Introduction

    Neonatal lupus (NL) represents a pathological manifestation of passively acquired autoimmunity. Maternal autoantibodies, regardless of health status, reactive with the ribonuculeoproteins SSA/Ro and/or SSB/La are almost universally present in cases of isolated fetal heart block.1 The cardiac manifestations of NL (cardiac-NL) are well characterised and include conduction disease and life-threatening cardiomyopathy.1 2 Cardiac-NL is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.1 3 Prospective studies of anti-SSA/Ro positive women without previously affected pregnancies have shown an estimated 2% risk of cardiac-NL.4,–,6 The recurrence rates in subsequent pregnancies are 10-fold higher.1 7 Despite monitoring at-risk fetuses and immediate treatment of conduction abnormalities, complete block has never been reversed.

    This irreversibility supports the need for prevention, best formulated based on the pathophysiology of disease. While the mechanism of antibody-mediated cardiac damage is not fully delineated, it has been posited that Toll-like receptor (TLR) activation may promote cardiac inflammation and scarring.8 This suggests that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), which inhibits endosomal acidification required for optimal TLR signalling9 and is a medication used by patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) even during pregnancy, may prevent cardiac injury. Accordingly, this study addressed the hypothesis that mothers continuing HCQ treatment throughout pregnancy have a decreased risk of having a child with cardiac-NL by mining three of the largest well-characterised studies of pregnant anti-SSA/Ro-SSB/La antibody positive women with SLE.

    Methods

    Study population

    Pregnancies resulting in cases (cardiac-NL) and controls (non-cardiac-NL) were identified from three overlapping sources: Research Registry for Neonatal Lupus (RRNL)1; PR Interval and Dexamethasone Evaluation (PRIDE) in cardiac-NL4 10; and Predictors of Pregnancy Outcomes: Biomarkers in Antiphospholipid Syndrome and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (PROMISSE). Each database has IRB approval for evaluation of de-identified information. All pregnancies present in two of the studies were identified and counted once.

    Since patients with SLE were more likely to be prescribed HCQ than other anti-SSA/Ro-SSB/La positive patients, the analysis was limited to mothers who had a diagnosis of SLE at the time of pregnancy to minimise potential biases due to confounding by indication.

    Inclusion/exclusion criteria

    Pregnancies were included if all the following criteria were met: (1) documentation of maternal antibodies reactive with SSA/Ro and/or SSB/La at the time of or prior to pregnancy from either NYU or another CLIA approved laboratory (see Appendix to Methods in online supplement); (2) confirmation of the child's outcome based on medical records; (3) information on medications used and health status during pregnancy based on questionnaires (regarding signs and symptoms of SLE) and medical records; (4) birth of child by 31 December 2007; (5) a rheumatologist's diagnosis of SLE reported in the medical records prior to conception (see Appendix to Methods in online supplement).

    Study design, outcome measure and data collection

    This was a case–control study to determine whether exposure to HCQ reduced the risk of cardiac-NL. The primary outcomes (cardiac-NL and non-cardiac-NL) have been previously defined.7 A pregnancy was considered exposed to HCQ if the mother took ≥200 mg/day throughout pregnancy. A pregnancy was considered unexposed if HCQ was never taken or was discontinued at the knowledge of pregnancy.

    The prior risk of developing cardiac-NL was estimated based on previous pregnancy outcomes and categorised as 2% if no prior affected child,4,–,6 13–18% if a prior child had a cutaneous manifestation of NL,11 18–20% if a prior child had cardiac-NL1 7 and 50% if two prior children had cardiac-NL.7 Additional data collected included maternal anti-SSA/Ro-SSB/La antibody status and treatments including plasmapheresis, azathioprine, intra-venous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and steroids (fluorinated or non-fluorinated) given either before the diagnosis of cardiac-NL or, if non-cardiac-NL, before 30 weeks of gestation (given the unlikelihood of cardiac-NL being first detected after this time).1

    Statistical analysis

    Generalised linear models were fit to the data using the statistical software program SAS V.9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA) to evaluate the effects of HCQ use on the risk of cardiac-NL and to compare demographic and clinical characteristics between cardiac-NL cases and controls. Because multiple children from the same family were included in the analysis, generalised estimating equations (GEE) were used to account for within-family correlation in the data.12 Two-sided p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

    Results

    Patient demographics, maternal autoantibody status and medication use

    Two hundred and one children met the inclusion criteria, 50 cardiac-NL (cases) and 151 non-cardiac-NL (controls) (table 1). Of the 50 cases, 46 had heart block (43 second or third degree, 3 first degree) and four had an isolated cardiomyopathy. Of the three cases with first degree heart block, two reversed following dexamethasone (one had an accompanying cardiomyopathy) and one remained in first degree at 3 years. Of the controls, 123 were unaffected, 25 had cutaneous-NL and 3 had isolated hepatic/haematological manifestations.

    View this table:
    Table 1

    Outcome of children

    The demographic characteristics, antibody status, risk of NL and immunosuppressive medications are shown in table 2 and, except for year of birth and use of non-fluorinated steroids, were not significantly different between cases and controls. Specifically, cardiac-NL children were more likely to have been born before 2000 than non-cardiac-NL children (p<0.0001) and their mothers were less likely to have been exposed to non-fluorinated steroids before 30 weeks (p=0.05). There were no differences in the use of plasmapheresis, azathioprine or IVIG between cases and controls (data not shown).

    View this table:
    Table 2

    Clinical and demographic characteristics of cardiac-NL cases and non-cardiac-NL controls

    Evaluation of overall HCQ exposure

    Sixty-three of the 201 children were exposed to HCQ, 7 (14%) of the cardiac-NL cases and 56 (37%) of the controls, corresponding to an estimated OR for cardiac-NL associated with HCQ use of 0.28 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.63; p=0.002). Most cardiac-NL cases came from the RRNL cohort where HCQ use was infrequent (15.7%). In pregnancies from the PRIDE and PROMISSE cohorts, HCQ use was greater (44.7% and 59.6%, respectively). In addition to pregnancies in which the mother was not exposed to HCQ at any time during pregnancy, the following five pregnancies were considered unexposed: four mothers discontinued HCQ upon conception with two subsequently developing cardiac-NL and one mother who began HCQ after 11 weeks of pregnancy and had a non-cardiac-NL child. There was no difference in the dosage of HCQ between cases and controls (table 2).

    Analysis of HCQ effects by birth year and non-fluorinated steroid use

    Additional analyses were performed to assess whether the observed protective effect of HCQ may have been confounded by other factors. For example, fewer cardiac-NL cases were born after 2000: 20 (40%) compared with controls 106 (70.2%), p<0.0001. Birth year was highly correlated with HCQ use: 4 (5.3%) of 75 pregnancies prior to 2000 were exposed to HCQ compared with 59 (46.8%) of 126 pregnancies occurring during or after 2000 (p<0.0001).

    In analyses stratified by birth year, HCQ remained associated with a reduced risk of cardiac-NL. However, the magnitude of the protective effect was reduced and the results did not attain statistical significance. Among births during or after 2000, 6 (30%) of 20 cardiac-NL cases were exposed to HCQ compared with 53 (50%) of 106 in the non-cardiac-NL group (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.16 to 1.14; p=0.09). The estimated OR was similar in the subset of births prior to 2000 (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.09 to 2.6; p=0.39). The overall OR adjusted for birth year was 0.44 (95% CI 0.19 to 1.03; p=0.06).

    Maternal exposure to non-fluorinated steroids before 30 weeks was less likely among cases than in controls (28% vs 44%; p=0.05) and was positively correlated with HCQ use (p=0.005). In analyses stratified by exposure to non-fluorinated steroids, HCQ remained associated with a lower risk of cardiac-NL regardless of exposure, with an overall OR adjusted for non-fluorinated steroid use of 0.31 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.73; p=0.007).

    Multivariable analyses

    In a multivariable GEE model fit to the combined data which adjusted for birth period (<2000 vs ≥2000), race/ethnicity, antibody status, non-fluorinated steroid use and prior cardiac-NL risk, the estimated OR for cardiac-NL associated with HCQ was 0.46 (95% CI 0.18 to 1.18; p=0.10) (table 3). Although HCQ use was no longer a statistically significant predictor of cardiac-NL status, the estimate of the OR remained in the direction of a protective effect, consistent with the results from the overall unadjusted analysis and the above subgroup analyses.

    View this table:
    Table 3

    Results of multivariable generalised estimating equations (GEE) analysis

    Evaluation of pregnancies subsequent to a cardiac-NL case

    The recurrence rate of cardiac-NL in this study was 24.2%. None of the 8 subsequent pregnancies that developed cardiac-NL were exposed to HCQ. Of the 25 subsequent pregnancies that did not develop cardiac-NL, 3 were exposed to HCQ, limiting analysis of the influence of HCQ on recurrence rate.

    Discussion

    Initial exploration into the potential protective effect of HCQ considered all mothers with anti-SSA/Ro antibodies regardless of health status.13 Although the major risk factor for developing cardiac-NL is the presence of specific autoantibodies, the use of HCQ is influenced by maternal diagnosis. The study was therefore limited to mothers with SLE, which reduced the number of cardiac-NL children. The OR in mothers taking HCQ showed a 70% risk reduction. However, non-cardiac-NL children were more likely to be born during or after the year 2000 and their mothers were more likely to be taking non-fluorinated steroids. Using a multivariable GEE model to account for these and other potential confounders, the estimated risk remained decreased by nearly 50% but was no longer statistically significant.

    Antimalarial drugs are frequently prescribed to patients with SLE and have been shown to prevent flares during pregnancy.14 15 Despite accumulating evidence supporting HCQ use during pregnancy, physicians and patients may remain reluctant to prescribe or take HCQ given isolated case reports of toxicity from chloroquine and quinine.16 17 Supporting this concern, four patients discontinued HCQ once pregnant, and it remains unclear how many may have done so while planning a pregnancy. The current FDA designation of HCQ is pregnancy category risk C. However, recent literature supports HCQ safety during pregnancy.18,–,20 Since the current study was retrospective, evaluation of adverse fetal effects is limited.

    A third of the patients in this study were taking HCQ. Although cardiac-NL occurred in each database, most were from the RRNL cohort where HCQ use was infrequent compared with the other two sources. This observation raises the possibility of fundamental differences between groups not accounted for by adjustment for birth year and other patient characteristics, which could explain the finding that HCQ may be protective. While the diagnosis of SLE was based on the rheumatologist's judgement which, coupled with the patient questionnaire, resulted in four criteria; the absence of all criteria specifically listed in the medical records was a potential limitation of the study.

    In conclusion, this case–control study suggests that HCQ use in mothers with SLE and anti-SSA/Ro-SSB/La antibodies may reduce the risk of fetal cardiac-NL. Confirmation with larger prospective studies is needed.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors are grateful to Amy Lawless for help in preparing the manuscript.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Buyon JP,
      2. Hiebert R,
      3. Copel J,
      4. et al
      . Autoimmune-associated congenital heart block: demographics, mortality, morbidity and recurrence rates obtained from a national neonatal lupus registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:1658–66.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    2. ↵
      1. Nield LE,
      2. Silverman ED,
      3. Smallhorn JF,
      4. et al
      . Endocardial fibroelastosis associated with maternal anti-Ro and anti-La antibodies in the absence of atrioventricular block. Circulation 2002;40:796–802.
      OpenUrl
    3. ↵
      1. Waltuck J,
      2. Buyon JP
      . Autoantibody-associated congenital heart block: outcome in mothers and children. Ann Intern Med 1994;120:544–51.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    4. ↵
      1. Friedman DM,
      2. Kim MY,
      3. Copel JA,
      4. et al
      .; PRIDE Investigators. Utility of cardiac monitoring in fetuses at risk for congenital heart block: the PR Interval and Dexamethasone Evaluation (PRIDE) prospective study. Circulation 2008;117:485–93.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    5. ↵
      1. Cimaz R,
      2. Spence DL,
      3. Hornberger L,
      4. et al
      . Incidence and spectrum of neonatal lupus erythematosus: a prospective study of infants born to mothers with anti-Ro autoantibodies. J Pediatr 2003;142:678–83.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    6. ↵
      1. Brucato A,
      2. Frassi M,
      3. Franceschini F,
      4. et al
      . Risk of congenital complete heart block in newborns of mothers with anti-Ro/SSA antibodies detected by counterimmunoelectrophoresis: a prospective study of 100 women. Arthritis Rheum 2001;44:1832–5.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    7. ↵
      1. Llanos C,
      2. Izmirly PM,
      3. Katholi M,
      4. et al
      . Recurrence rates of cardiac manifestations associated with neonatal lupus and maternal/fetal risk factors. Arthritis Rheum 2009;60:3091–7.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    8. ↵
      1. Clancy RM,
      2. Alvaraz D,
      3. Komissarova EV,
      4. et al
      . Ro60-associated single-stranded rna links inflammation with fetal cardiac fibrosis via ligation of tlrs: a novel pathway to autoimmune-associated heart block. J Immunol 2010;184:2148–55.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    9. ↵
      1. Lafyatis R,
      2. York M,
      3. Marshak-Rothstein A
      . Antimalarial agents: closing the gate on Toll-like receptors? Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:3068–70.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    10. ↵
      1. Friedman DM,
      2. Kim MY,
      3. Copel JA,
      4. et al
      . Prospective evaluation of fetuses with autoimmune-associated congenital heart block followed in the PR Interval and Dexamethasone Evaluation (PRIDE) Study. Am J Cardiol 2009;103:1102–6.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    11. ↵
      1. Izmirly PM,
      2. Llanos C,
      3. Lee LA,
      4. et al
      . Cutaneous manifestations of neonatal lupus and risk for subsequent congenital heart block. Arthritis Rheum 2010;62:1153–7.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    12. ↵
      1. Liang K,
      2. Zeger SL
      . Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrics 1986;42:121–30.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    13. ↵
      1. Izmirly P,
      2. Kim M,
      3. Le P,
      4. et al
      . Decreased risk of anti-Ro/La associated congenital heart (CHB) in fetuses exposed to hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). Arthritis Rheum 2008;58:S810.
      OpenUrl
    14. ↵
      1. Levy RA,
      2. Vilela VS,
      3. Cataldo MJ,
      4. et al
      . Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in lupus pregnancy: double-blind and placebo-controlled study. Lupus 2001;10:401–4.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    15. ↵
      1. Clowse ME,
      2. Magder L,
      3. Witter F,
      4. et al
      . Hydroxychloroquine in lupus pregnancy. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:3640–7.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    16. ↵
      1. Matz GJ,
      2. Naunton RF
      . Ototoxicity of chloroquine. Arch Otolaryngol 1968;88:370–2.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    17. ↵
      1. Paufique L,
      2. Magnard P
      . Retinal degeneration in two children following preventative antimalarial treatment of the mother during pregnancy. Bull Soc Opthalmol Fr 1969;69:466–7.
      OpenUrl
    18. ↵
      1. Ruiz-Irastorza G,
      2. Ramos-Casals M,
      3. Brito-Zeron P,
      4. et al
      . Clinical efficacy and side effects of antimalarials in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:20–8.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    19. ↵
      1. Costedoat-Chalumeau N,
      2. Amoura Z,
      3. Huong DL,
      4. et al
      . Safety of hydroxychloroquine in pregnant patients with connective tissue disease. Review of the literature. Autoimmun Rev 2005;4:111–15.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    20. ↵
      1. Østensen M,
      2. Khamashta M,
      3. Lockshin M,
      4. et al
      . Anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive drugs and reproduction. Arthritis Res Ther 2006;8:209.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

    Supplementary materials

    • Web Only Data ard.2009.119263

      Files in this Data Supplement:

    Footnotes

    • Funding PMI and CL were supported by the SLE Lupus Foundation Inc. In addition, this work was supported by Maternal Autoantibodies: Pathogenesis of Neonatal Lupus (NIH Grant No. AR-42455, MERIT status), the Research Registry for Neonatal Lupus (supported by NIAMS Contract No. AR-4-2271), PR Interval and Dexamethasone Evaluation in Cardiac-NL (NIH Grant No. AR-046265) and a Kirkland Center Grant to JPB. Predictors of Pregnancy Outcomes: Biomarkers in Antiphospholipid Syndrome and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus was supported by NIH Grant No. RO1 AR49772 to JES.

    • Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the IRB.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.