Original Article
Image-Based Micro-Finite-Element Modeling for Improved Distal Radius Strength Diagnosis: Moving From “Bench” to “Bedside”

https://doi.org/10.1385/JCD:7:2:153Get rights and content

Abstract

Although osteoporosis is characterized by quantitative (mass) and qualitative (structural) changes, standard clinical techniques (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, DXA) only measure the former. Three-dimensional micro-finite-element (micro-FE) models based on high-resolution images can account for structural aspects as well, and it has recently been shown that an improved prediction of distal radius strength is possible with micro-FE analysis. A clinical application of this technique, however, is limited by its high imaging and computational demands. The objective of this study is to investigate if an improved prediction of bone strength can be obtained as well when only a small part of the radius is used for micro-FE modeling. Images of a 1-cm region of the metaphysis of the distal radius of 54 cadaver arms (mean age: 82 ± 9 SD) made with a three-dimensional peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) device at 165-μm resolution formed the basis for micro-FE models that were used to predict the bone failure load. Following imaging, specimens were experimentally compressed to failure to produce a Colles'-type fracture. Failure loads predicted from micro-FE analyses agreed well with those measured experimentally (R2 = 0.66, p < 0.001). Lower correlations were observed with bone mass (R2 = 0.48, p < 0.001) and microstructural parameters (R2 = 0.47, p < 0.001). Hence, even when only a small region is modeled, micro-FE analysis provides an improved prediction of radius strength.

References (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (84)

  • HR-pQCT parameters of the distal radius correlate with the bending strength of the radial diaphysis

    2022, Bone
    Citation Excerpt :

    The ROI was an axial segment equal to ~9.0 mm that started ~9.5 mm from the radiocarpal joint surface. Similar correlations between experimental failure force of cadaveric radii and μFEA predictions of failure load were observed in earlier studies using a lower resolution pQCT scanner (voxel size = 165 μm) and the same failure criteria: R2 = 0.75 [10] and R2 = 0.66 [11]. To date, there have been two validation studies of μFEA for the XtremeCT II scanner, which can generate images with an isotropic voxel size = 60.7 μm [12,13].

  • In vivo repeatability of homogenized finite element analysis based on multiple HR-pQCT sections for assessment of distal radius and tibia strength

    2020, Bone
    Citation Excerpt :

    As the tibia is roughly 1.4 times longer than the radius [17], a triple-section is scanned at the distal tibia (Fig. 2B). The validity of patient-specific μFE and homogenized FE (hFE) models has previously been investigated, showing high correlations with mechanical compression experiments of cadaveric samples [9–11,18,19]. In order to be of clinical use in detecting and monitoring changes in bone strength over time and during interventions or treatments, the measurement precision is fundamental [20].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text