Elsevier

Thrombosis Research

Volume 124, Issue 6, December 2009, Pages 663-666
Thrombosis Research

Regular Article
Prospective analysis of risk factors and distribution of venous thromboembolism in the population-based Malmö Thrombophilia Study (MATS)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2009.04.022Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Despite venous thromboembolism (VTE) being a major cause of morbidity and mortality, there is still limited information on its prevalence and incidence in the general population.

Objective

To evaluate risk factors, distribution and epidemiology of VTE in the Malmö area with 280 000 inhabitants.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with VTE at Malmö University Hospital in 1998–2006 were invited to a prospective population-based study. Blood sampling and a questionnaire study could be performed in 70% of patients. Remaining 30% were excluded due to language problems, dementia, other severe disease, or unwillingness to participate.

Results

During 1998–2006 1140 VTE patients (559 men [49%, age 62 ± 16 years] and 581 women [51%, age 61 ± 20 years]) were included. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) occurred in 882 (77%), pulmonary embolism (PE) in 330 (29%), and both DVT and PE in 72 (6%). The most common acquired risk factors among VTE patients were hormone therapy (24% of female DVT patients and 19% of female PE patients), immobilisation (17% of DVT patients and 18% of PE patients), previous surgery (13% of DVT patients and 19% of PE patients), and concomitant malignant disease (12% of DVT patients and 11% of PE patients). A positive family history for VTE was obtained from 25% of DVT patients and 22% of PE patients.

Yearly incidences of VTE, DVT and PE in Malmö were 66, 51, and 19/100.000, respectively.

Conclusion

Hormone therapy, immobilisation, previous surgery and concomitant malignancy were the most common acquired risk factors among VTE patients in this population-based study. The VTE-incidence was lower than in earlier epidemiological studies.

Section snippets

Background

Despite the fact that venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in western countries there is still insufficient information available on risk factor patterns and patient characteristics in total materials of VTE patients derived from the general population. Many of previous studies have focused on VTE in defined patients groups, such as in patients with malignancies [1], [2], patients undergoing orthopaedic [3], gynaecologic laparoscopy [4] procedures, in

Patients

The Malmö Thrombophilia Study (MATS) is a prospective population-based study at Malmö University Hospital with a primary catchment area of 280 000 inhabitants. This is the only hospital in the area treating VTE patients. The study recruited patients between March 1998 and December 2006. During this period 1140 patients with VTE were included.

The criteria for inclusion in MATS were: patient age > 18 years, possibility to communicate in Swedish, and an objective diagnosis of DVT or PE made with

Results

A total of 1140 consecutive patients with VTE, 559 men (49%, age range 62 ± 16 years), and 581 women (51%, age range 61 ± 20 years) were included in the study between March 1998 and December 2006. Eight hundred eighty two (77%) patients had DVT, 330 (29%) patients had PE and 72 (6%) patients had both DVT and PE. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. Of 882 DVT patients, 499 (56%) patients hade left leg DVT, 116 (13%) had iliaca DVT, 465 (53%) had DVT involving femoropopliteal veins, 246

Discussion

Many previous studies focusing on the epidemiology of VTE have been of retrospective design and included patients from defined subgroups of the general population [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], whereas we as some previous investigators [13], [22] prospectively determined and clarified the distribution and incidences of VTE occurring both as DVT and PE in a population based study. We included both out-patients presenting at our hospital because of suspected VTE symptoms and

Conflict of interest statement

Nazim Isma, Peter J Svensson, Anders Gottsäter, and Bengt Lindblad have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References (39)

  • S.M. Schellong et al.

    Ultrasound screening for asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis after major orthopaedic surgery: the VENUS study

    J Thromb Haemost

    (2007)
  • A.E. Segers et al.

    Is contrast venography a valid surrogate outcome measure in venous thromboembolism prevention studies?

    J Thromb Haemost

    (2005)
  • C. Kearon et al.

    Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)

    Chest

    (2008)
  • A. Alcalay et al.

    Venous thromboembolism in patients with colorectal cancer: incidence and effect on survival

    J Clin Oncol

    (2006)
  • H.K. Chew et al.

    Incidence of venous thromboembolism and the impact on survival in breast cancer patients

    J Clin Oncol

    (2007)
  • M.R. Hoppener et al.

    Low incidence of deep vein thrombosis after knee arthroscopy without thromboprophylaxis: a prospective cohort study of 335 patients

    Acta Orthop

    (2006)
  • F.R. Rosendaal

    Risk factors for venous thrombotic disease

    Thromb Haemost

    (1999)
  • F.A. Anderson et al.

    Risk factors for venous thromboembolism

    Circulation

    (2003)
  • F.A. Anderson et al.

    A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The Worcester DVT Study

    Arch Intern Med

    (1991)
  • Cited by (55)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text