Basic and clinical immunology
Immune response to influenza vaccination in children and adults with asthma: effect of corticosteroid therapy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2003.12.584Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Annual influenza vaccination is currently recommended as a preventative measure for all patients with asthma. However, the effect of maintenance corticosteroid therapy on the immune response to influenza vaccine has received limited evaluation.

Objective

In this study, we evaluated the effect of corticosteroid therapy on the immune response to influenza vaccine in children and adults with asthma.

Methods

This was a substudy of a larger multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, crossover study investigating the safety of trivalent influenza vaccine in patients with asthma. At baseline, 294 subjects were randomized to receive either placebo first (n = 139) or inactivated trivalent split-virus influenza vaccine first (n = 155). Study subjects were categorized into 2 groups: subjects in group 1 (n = 148) were receiving medium-dose or high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) or oral corticosteroids, whereas subjects in group 2 (n = 146) were not receiving corticosteroids or were receiving low-dose ICSs. Serum hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers for the vaccine antigens were measured before and 4 weeks after the administration of placebo or vaccine.

Results

Serologic responses to each influenza vaccine antigen were significantly higher in vaccine than in placebo recipients and were similar among influenza vaccine recipients in groups 1 and 2 for the following endpoints: rise in antibody titer, percent of participants who developed a serological response, and percent of subjects who developed a serum hemagglutination inhibition antibody titer ≥1:32. Post hoc subgroup analyses demonstrated an attenuated response to influenza B antigen in subjects receiving high-dose ICS compared with subjects who were steroid-naïve (P<.05).

Conclusion

The immune response to the A antigens of the inactivated influenza vaccine in subjects with asthma is not adversely affected by ICS therapy. High-dose ICS therapy may diminish the response to the B antigen of the vaccine, an observation that needs further investigation.

Section snippets

Patients

This was a prospective study performed as a substudy of a larger multicenter, randomized crossover trial investigating the safety of year 2000 trivalent inactivated split-virus influenza vaccine in children and adults with asthma (n = 2032).14 A total of 294 subjects were recruited during the first arm of the main study (ie, before crossover) from 6 of 19 of the centers of the American Lung Association Asthma Clinical Research Centers network during the study period, September 2000 through

Patients

A total of 294 participants were eligible and consented for the study. Of these, 155 were randomized to receive the influenza vaccine first and 139 to placebo first. Of these, 15 participants from the vaccine group and 7 from the placebo group were dropped because of protocol violations (blood specimens were not received, only 1 specimen was received, or the patient did not come back for follow-up). Data from the remaining 272 participants (vaccine group, n = 140; placebo group, n = 132) were

Discussion

We have previously demonstrated the safety of inactivated influenza vaccination in a large cohort of children and adults with asthma.14 In this substudy, we found that the chronic use of ICS in these patients did not adversely affect the humoral immune response to influenza A (H1N1, H3N2) vaccine antigens. Similarly, in the primary analysis of the humoral responses to the influenza B antigen, no effect of chronic ICS use was seen. However, results of our post hoc subgroup analysis suggest that

Acknowledgements

The Asthma Clinical Research Centers investigators would like to thank David M. Shade, JD, RPFT, for his help in compiling the data for this project, the American Lung Association, and the following organizations that provided grant support for this study: the American Lung Associations of Alabama, Central Florida, Colorado, Delaware, Eastern Missouri, Florida, Georgia, Gulfcoast Florida, Hudson Valley, Indiana, Louisiana, Maine, Metropolitan Chicago, Mid-Ohio, Minnesota, Nassua-Suffolk, New

References (38)

  • W.A Keitel et al.

    Inactivated influenza vaccines

  • R Lambkin et al.

    Rapid antibody response to influenza vaccination in an “at risk” group

    Vaccine

    (2000)
  • M.A Kubiet et al.

    Serum antibody response to influenza vaccine in pulmonary patients receiving corticosteroids

    Chest

    (1996)
  • W.H Barker

    Excess pneumonia and influenza associated hospitalization during influenza epidemics in the United States

    Am J Public Health

    (1986)
  • K.M Sullivan et al.

    Estimates of the US health impact of influenza

    Am J Public Health

    (1993)
  • K.M Neuzil et al.

    The effect of influenza on hospitalizations, outpatient visits, and courses of antibiotics in children

    N Engl J Med

    (2000)
  • H.S Izurieta et al.

    Influenza and the rates of hospitalization for respiratory disease among infants and young children

    N Engl J Med

    (2000)
  • W.P Glezen et al.

    Impact of respiratory virus infections on persons with underlying conditions

    JAMA

    (2000)
  • N Sugaya et al.

    Efficacy of inactivated influenza vaccine in preventing antigenically drifted influenza type A and well-matched type B

    JAMA

    (1994)
  • Cited by (88)

    • Steroid-induced secondary immune deficiency

      2023, Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology
    • Spinal region corticosteroid injections are not associated with increased risk for influenza

      2022, Spine Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Earlier data regarding corticosteroid use and influenza infection has been inconsistent. While some studies have found that patients receiving inhaled or systemic corticosteroids may have a decreased immune response to influenza vaccination and thus may be more susceptible to influenza [16,17], others have shown no such decrease [18–21]. We recently found that vaccinated patients who received a large joint (hip, knee, shoulder) corticosteroid injection had an increased risk of influenza compared to unmatched vaccinated controls [13].

    • A New Consideration for Corticosteroid Injections: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19) Vaccination

      2022, Journal of Hand Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      The steroid doses varied from the daily equivalent of 2.5–60 mg of prednisone, with no correlation with antibody response. In a larger multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study of children and adults with asthma, trivalent influenza vaccination with systemic CS use was evaluated, and the subjects were separated into groups based on a low or no CS dose (group 1) and a moderate-to-high CS dose (group 2).19 Primary study endpoints demonstrated an adequate immune response (>4-fold rise in baseline antibody), which was similar in both groups that received vaccination for influenza (A and B), and chronic systemic CS use did not diminish this effect.

    • Asthma

      2020, Revue des Maladies Respiratoires Actualites
    • Infectious Complications of Corticosteroid Therapy

      2018, Principles and Practice of Pediatric Infectious Diseases
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by the American Lung Association.

    Presented at the American Thoracic Society Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Ga, May 2002.

    View full text