8
Risk of infection with biologic antirheumatic therapies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2015.05.009Get rights and content

Abstract

There are currently 10 licensed biologic therapies for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in 2014. In this article, we review the risk of serious infection (SI) for biologic therapies. This risk has been closely studied over the last 15 years within randomised controlled trials, long-term extension studies and observational drug registers, especially for the first three antitumour necrosis factor (TNF) drugs, namely infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab. The risk of SI with the newer biologics rituximab, tocilizumab, abatacept and tofacitinib is also reviewed, although further data from long-term observational studies are awaited. Beyond all-site SI, we review the risk of tuberculosis, other opportunistic infections and herpes zoster, and the effect of screening on TB rates. Lastly, we review emerging opportunities for stratifying the risk. Patients can be risk-stratified based on both modifiable and non-modifiable patient characteristics such as age, co-morbidity, glucocorticoid use, functional status and recent previous SI.

Introduction

The available armamentarium of biologic therapies for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has expanded rapidly in the last few years. The increasing number of therapies provides a welcome range of options for difficult-to-treat patients. Yet, as treatment options increase, it becomes more challenging to select the best option for a given patient. Clinicians are required to compare between treatment options, in terms of not only efficacy but also risk. One of the most notable risks with biologic therapy is the risk of infection. The aim of this review is to summarise and interpret the available evidence for the association between biologic therapies and the risk of infection, paying particular attention to comparative harms where possible. Topics within the review include a summary of currently available therapies and methods for monitoring drug safety. The evidence is then reviewed for all-site serious infection (SI), tuberculosis (TB), herpes zoster (HZ) and other opportunistic infections (OIs), and ending with risk stratification for the individual patient.

Section snippets

Treatment options in 2014

There are currently 10 biologic therapies licensed for the treatment of RA. Five of these are antitumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies, namely the monoclonal antibodies infliximab, adalimumab and golimumab, the dimeric fusion protein of the human TNF receptor and immunoglobulin (Ig)G1Fc fragment, etanercept, and the pegylated Fab fragments of a monoclonal antibody certolizumab pegol. Anti-TNF therapies were the first class of biological therapies to be licensed for the treatment of RA,

Monitoring drug safety

Biologic drugs are perhaps the most closely studied treatment with respect to safety across all drug classes and specialities. Following their launch, national biologic registers were established in Europe with multiple other international studies also investigating their safety over the years [1]. This was in addition to the initial randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and long-term observational studies. Such a close scrutiny was because of the biological plausibility of an increased risk of

Infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab

SI is defined as infections leading to hospitalisation, intravenous antibiotics or death. The first anti-TNF RCT, of infliximab, showed no difference in the proportion of anti-TNF-treated patients who developed an SI compared with patients receiving placebo [3]. No statistically significant difference was seen in this or subsequent early trials, although all were underpowered to study this relatively rare outcome. A systematic review of nine RCTs in 2006, however, found a doubling of the rate

Risk of tuberculosis with biologic therapy

The first case of TB in relation to anti-TNF therapy was reported in 1999 in a phase III trial of infliximab [3]. One patient developed disseminated TB in the LTE phase of the study and, after a protracted illness including a delay in diagnosis, finally succumbed to the illness. Another patient in that trial developed coccidioidomycosis. Following questions raised in that trial, there were 70 cases of TB reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) adverse events reporting system (AERS)

Risk of opportunistic infections with biologic therapy

OIs other than TB have also been reported more frequently in anti-TNF users compared with sDMARDs. However, these remain rare, and the absolute risk is low. A small but significantly increased risk of OI (OR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.17, 2.74) was reported in a meta-analysis of 70 trials including 32,504 patients involving all licensed biologics (infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, certolizumab, golimumab, rituximab, tocilizumab, abatacept and anakinra) [85]. In all, there were 1.7 excess infections per

Risk of herpes zoster with biologic therapy

HZ reactivation is a vaccine-preventable illness, with considerable morbidity from post-herpetic neuralgia, possible ophthalmic involvement and risk of disseminated infection. The risk of HZ or shingles is increased in any condition that causes decreased cell-mediated immunity – due to either increasing age or immunosuppression, and the risk has been shown to be increased in patients with RA in general, estimated to be about double that of the general population [92].

The risk of zoster with

Putting risk in perspective: absolute risk, risk scores and individualising risk

As summarised above, there is a wealth of data estimating relative and absolute risk of infections with the use of biologics. Although these data give a good general estimate of the risk to be expected in a patient population, the risk in an individual patient may not match the population average. For example, a young patient who is otherwise healthy will have a very different baseline risk of infection compared with an elderly patient with many co-morbidities and concurrent treatments. It has

Summary and conclusions

The number of biological agents available for the treatment of RA has increased exponentially in recent years. Although the agents are effective, there is also a small but significant increased risk of SI. Anti-TNF drugs are the most well studied, with an early increased risk of SI compared with sDMARD – a finding seen in both clinical trials and observational studies. There is a slightly higher rate of SI with infliximab. The risk of SI with the newer biologics may be comparable, though data

Funding

Dr Dixon was supported by an MRC Clinician Scientist Fellowship (G0902272).

References (108)

  • A.E. Thompson et al.

    Tumor necrosis factor therapy and the risk of serious infection and malignancy in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2011 June)
  • J.P. Leombruno et al.

    The safety of anti-tumour necrosis factor treatments in rheumatoid arthritis: meta and exposure-adjusted pooled analyses of serious adverse events

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2009 July)
  • J. Listing et al.

    Infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biologic agents

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2005 November)
  • W.G. Dixon et al.

    Rates of serious infection, including site-specific and bacterial intracellular infection, in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2006 August)
  • J. Askling et al.

    Time-dependent increase in risk of hospitalisation with infection among Swedish RA patients treated with TNF antagonists

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2007 October)
  • W.G. Dixon et al.

    Serious infection following anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: lessons from interpreting data from observational studies

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2007 September)
  • J.B. Galloway et al.

    Anti-TNF therapy is associated with an increased risk of serious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis especially in the first 6 months of treatment: updated results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register with special emphasis on risks in the elderly

    Rheumatol Oxf

    (2011 January)
  • J.R. Curtis et al.

    Drug-specific and time-dependent risks of bacterial infection among patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were exposed to tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonists

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2007 December)
  • A. Strangfeld et al.

    Treatment benefit or survival of the fittest: what drives the time-dependent decrease in serious infection rates under TNF inhibition and what does this imply for the individual patient?

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2011 November)
  • J.R. Curtis et al.

    The comparative risk of serious infections among rheumatoid arthritis patients starting or switching biological agents

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2011 August)
  • Y. Komano et al.

    Incidence and risk factors for serious infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: a report from the Registry of Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients for long term safety

    J Rheumatol

    (2011 July)
  • R. Sakai et al.

    Time-dependent increased risk for serious infection from continuous use of tumor necrosis factor antagonists over three years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)

    (2012 August)
  • J.R. Curtis et al.

    Risk of hospitalized bacterial infections associated with biologic treatment among US veterans with rheumatoid arthritis

    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)

    (2014 July)
  • L. Campbell et al.

    Risk of adverse events including serious infections in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with tocilizumab: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

    Rheumatol Oxf

    (2011 March)
  • C. Salliot et al.

    Risk of serious infections during rituximab, abatacept and anakinra treatments for rheumatoid arthritis: meta-analyses of randomised placebo-controlled trials

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2009 January)
  • R.F. van Vollenhoven et al.

    Long-term safety of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis: 9.5-year follow-up of the global clinical trial programme with a focus on adverse events of interest in RA patients

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2013 September 1)
  • R. Alten et al.

    Long-term safety of subcutaneous abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis: integrated analysis of clinical trial data representing more than four years of treatment

    Arthritis Rheumatol

    (2014 August)
  • P. Emery et al.

    Golimumab, a human anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody, injected subcutaneously every four weeks in methotrexate-naive patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: twenty-four-week results of a phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of golimumab before methotrexate as first-line therapy for early-onset rheumatoid arthritis

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2009 August)
  • P. Emery et al.

    Golimumab, a human anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody, injected subcutaneously every 4 weeks in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who had never taken methotrexate: 1-year and 2-year clinical, radiologic, and physical function findings of a phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)

    (2013 November)
  • E. Keystone et al.

    Golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy: 52-week results of the GO-FORWARD study

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2010 June)
  • E.C. Keystone et al.

    Golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy: results through 2 years of the GO-FORWARD study extension

    J Rheumatol

    (2013 July)
  • J.S. Smolen et al.

    Golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who have previous experience with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: results of a long-term extension of the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled GO-AFTER study through week 160

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2012 October)
  • E.C. Keystone et al.

    Golimumab, a human antibody to tumour necrosis factor {alpha} given by monthly subcutaneous injections, in active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy: the GO-FORWARD Study

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2009 June)
  • M.E. Weinblatt et al.

    Efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol in a broad population of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results from the REALISTIC phase IIIb study

    Rheumatol Oxf

    (2012 December)
  • M. Weinblatt et al.

    Safety of the selective costimulation modulator abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving background biologic and nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a one-year randomized, placebo-controlled study

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2006 September)
  • M.W. Greenwald et al.

    Evaluation of the safety of rituximab in combination with a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor and methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results from a randomized controlled trial

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2011 March)
  • M.C. Genovese et al.

    Combination therapy with etanercept and anakinra in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have been treated unsuccessfully with methotrexate

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2004 May)
  • M. Weinblatt et al.

    Selective costimulation modulation using abatacept in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis while receiving etanercept: a randomised clinical trial

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2007 February)
  • J.A. Singh et al.

    The risk of serious infection with biologics in treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Lancet

    (11 May 2015)
  • J. Keane et al.

    Tuberculosis associated with infliximab, a tumor necrosis factor alpha-neutralizing agent

    N Engl J Med

    (2001 October 11)
  • R.S. Wallis et al.

    Granulomatous infections due to tumor necrosis factor blockade: correction

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2004 October 15)
  • R.S. Wallis et al.

    Granulomatous infectious diseases associated with tumor necrosis factor antagonists

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2004 May 1)
  • W.G. Dixon et al.

    Drug-specific risk of tuberculosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with anti-TNF therapy: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR)

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2010 March)
  • E.V. Arkema et al.

    Are patients with rheumatoid arthritis still at an increased risk of tuberculosis and what is the role of biological treatments?

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2014 March 7)
  • K.L. Winthrop et al.

    Mycobacterial diseases and antitumour necrosis factor therapy in USA

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2013 January)
  • J. Bathon et al.

    Sustained disease remission and inhibition of radiographic progression in methotrexate-naive patients with rheumatoid arthritis and poor prognostic factors treated with abatacept: 2-year outcomes

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2011 November)
  • S.B. Cohen et al.

    Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial evaluating primary efficacy and safety at twenty-four weeks

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2006 September)
  • P. Emery et al.

    The efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate treatment: results of a phase IIB randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2006 May)
  • P. Emery et al.

    IL-6 receptor inhibition with tocilizumab improves treatment outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-tumour necrosis factor biologicals: results from a 24-week multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2008 November)
  • P. Emery et al.

    Efficacy and safety of different doses and retreatment of rituximab: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial in patients who are biological naive with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate (Study Evaluating Rituximab's Efficacy in MTX iNadequate rEsponders (SERENE))

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2010 September)
  • Cited by (66)

    • Total-Body PET Imaging of Musculoskeletal Disorders

      2021, PET Clinics
      Citation Excerpt :

      As noted above, the unique characteristics of TB PET/CT including the long axial field-of-view, high sensitivity, and excellent spatial resolution could overcome the challenges that are faced with conventional PET instruments. Particularly, TB PET/CT would enable (1) staging of RA or PsA disease activity in the entire body, as opposed to examining only a limited subset of joints, so that the appropriate therapy for each individual patient and disease state can be adopted and therefore improving the outcome34,35; (2) monitoring response to therapy in joint tissues to optimize the therapeutic window36 and drug efficacy on a personalized basis,37–39 switching promptly to another treatment in nonresponders40,41; and (3) assessing the influence of treatment on other crucial organ system, such as the cardiovascular system,42 to reduce comorbidities and side-effects.43–45 In the juvenile population, the potential of lowering radiation dose and shortening scan time will also be of great importance because the incidence of autoimmune arthritis is relatively high in this age group.

    • Torque teno virus viremia in patients with chronic arthritis: Influence of biologic therapies

      2020, Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, despite some target-specific differences such as the rates of mycobacterial infection, all biologics show similar rates of severe infections suggesting that all have a similar impact on global immunocompetence [1,2]. Additional risk factors such as age, diabetes, glucocorticoids also similarly contribute to increased risk for the differently targeted biologics [3–5]. Transplant immunosuppression strongly modifies the endogenous virome in plasma and these changes may represent a potential measure of immunocompetence [6].

    • Role of biological agents in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

      2019, Pharmacological Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, subsequent studies showed that the rate of heart failure is not increased in patients receiving TNFi, and the risk of symptomatic congestive heart failure was not increased in the high risk group of patients with established heart failure during therapy with TNFi [3]. Biologic DMARDs are associated with an increase in the number of serious infections of the order of six per 1000 patients treated annually, compared to conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) [4,5]. TNF inhibition is associated with increased risk of tuberculosis and therefore screening for and treatment of latent tuberculosis are necessary prior to initiation of TNFi [6].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    University Medicine Cluster, National University Health System, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Tower Block, Level 10, Singapore 119228, Singapore. Tel.: +65 67722994.

    View full text