OBSTETRICS
Congenital Malformations: Agreement Between Diagnostic Codes in an Administrative Database and Mothers’ Reports

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34523-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

The validity of epidemiologic research on congenital malformations conducted using administrative databases relies heavily on the quality of diagnostic information. The goal of this study was to validate the diagnostic codes for major congenital malformations (MCMs) recorded in a medical service claims database against mother’s report obtained by questionnaire.

Methods

Using the Quebec Pregnancy Registry, we mailed a questionnaire to women who gave birth to a baby with an MCM and to a random sample of mothers whose infants did not have any malformation. We reviewed each infant’s database record for a diagnostic code for MCM, which we then compared with the corresponding mother’s report.

Results

Among the 3142 mother–infant pairs there was 60% agreement regarding the presence or absence of an MCM; for 456 babies, both sources reported the presence of an MCM. For 90% of these infants the two sources of information agreed with respect to the type of malformation.

Conclusion

Overall, mothers reported fewer infants with MCM than were recorded in the database; among those for whom both sources of information indicated the presence of an MCM, a very high proportion of diagnostic codes accorded with the mother’s description of the specific type of malformation.

Résumé

Objectif

La validité de la recherche épidémiologique sur les malformations congénitales menée au moyen de bases de données administratives repose grandement sur la qualité des renseignements diagnostiques. L’objectif de cette étude était de valider, en fonction du rapport de la mère obtenu par questionnaire, les codes diagnostiques des malformations congénitales majeures (MCM) consignés dans une base de données des réclamations de service médical.

Méthodes

Au moyen du Registre des grossesses du Québec, nous avons posté un questionnaire aux femmes qui ont donné naissance à un enfant présentant une MCM, ainsi qu’à un échantillon aléatoire de mères dont les enfants ne présentaient aucune malformation. Nous avons analysé le dossier de base de données de chacun de ces enfants afin d’y repérer un code diagnostique correspondant à la MCM, que nous avons alors comparé au rapport de la mère correspondant.

Résultats

Parmi les 3 142 paires mère-enfant, nous avons constaté une correspondance de 60 % à l’égard de la présence ou de l’absence d’une MCM; dans le cas de 456 enfants, les deux sources ont signalé la présence d’une MCM. Chez 90 % de ces enfants, les deux sources de renseignements indiquaient le même type de malformation.

Conclusion

De façon globale, les mères ont signalé moins d’enfants présentant une MCM que ce qui a été consigné dans la base de données; chez celles pour lesquelles les deux sources de renseignements indiquaient la présence d’une MCM, les codes diagnostiques correspondaient à la description du type particulier de malformation par la mère dans une proportion très élevée.

REFERENCES (13)

  • M. Wilchesky et al.

    Validation of diagnostic codes within medical services claims

    J Clin Epidemiol

    (2004)
  • A. Bérard et al.

    First trimester exposure to paroxetine and risk of cardiac malformations in infants: the importance of dosage

    Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol

    (2007)
  • B. Ofori et al.

    Risk of congenital anomalies in pregnant users of statin drugs

    Br J Clin Pharmacol

    (2007)
  • E. Ramos et al.

    Duration of antidepressant use during pregnancy and risk of major congenital malformations

    Br J Psychiatry

    (2008)
  • A. Vilain et al.

    Agreement between administrative databases and medical charts for pregnancy-related variables among asthmatic women

    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf

    (2008)
  • S. Kulaga et al.

    Prescriptions filled during pregnancy for drugs with the potential of fetal harm

    BJOG

    (2009)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (14)

  • New evidence for concern over the risk of birth defects from medications for nausea and vomitting of pregnancy

    2019, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    MCMs diagnosed in the first 6 months of life were identified in the RAMQ and MedEcho databases and defined according to ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes (Appendix Table S2). The use of ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for the identification of MCMs in the QPC has been validated against medical patient charts (PPV of at least 80% and NPV of 93%) [23,24]. All organ systems were considered as well as overall MCMs.

  • Low-to-moderate prenatal alcohol consumption and the risk of selected birth outcomes: A prospective cohort study

    2015, Annals of Epidemiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Birth length and head circumference were analyzed as continuous outcomes using the lowest 10th percentile according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention standards [28] to define low birth length and reduced head circumference. Additional clinical outcomes included major selected congenital malformations [29]; Apgar score less than 7 at 1 and 5 minutes; ventilation (including need for continuous positive airway pressure); placement in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU; observation or admission); and neonatal jaundice. Demographic covariates included maternal age, ethnicity, marital status, education, parity, and employment.

  • Antiepileptic drug use during pregnancy: Perinatal outcomes

    2011, Seizure
    Citation Excerpt :

    Gestational age, previously validated,26 was obtained from hospital charts, which enabled us to calculate exact timing of AED exposure during pregnancy. Finally, diagnoses of major congenital malformations have previously been validated.36 Limitations of this study include the use of exposure data based on prescription fillings, which might not necessarily reflect actual intake.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Competing Interests: None declared

View full text