Elsevier

Autoimmunity Reviews

Volume 1, Issue 5, October 2002, Pages 298-304
Autoimmunity Reviews

Treatment of pregnancy loss in Hughes syndrome: a critical update

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1568-9972(02)00067-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Recurrent pregnancy loss is one of the main manifestations of antiphospholipid (Hughes) syndrome (APS). Fetal deaths (beyond the 10th week of gestation) are the most typical obstetric complication of APS. Data from controlled therapeutic trials are difficult to analyse, due to small samples and great heterogeneity in the obstetric history and antiphospholipid antibody profiles of women included. Corticosteroids are more harmful than beneficial. Heparin and aspirin are the drugs of choice for APS-related miscarriage, although it is not clear whether combination of both drugs is necessary for all women. The role of immunoglobulins is not well defined.

Introduction

Recurrent pregnancy loss is one of the most prominent, and often dramatic, features of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS or Hughes syndrome). The precise cause (or causes) of this manifestation is not known, but several have been proposed, including interference with prostacyclin/thromboxane balance at the endothelial level, inhibition of annexin V—a natural placental anticoagulant—inhibition of antithrombin, protein C and protein S and activation of platelets [1]. The pathologic findings in placentas of women with APS and the fact that other thrombophilias may produce miscarriage as well [2] reinforce the role of placental insufficiency—secondary to placental thrombosis and infarction—as the main mechanism of pregnancy loss in APS. However, other mechanisms may also be involved, especially in early miscarriages, including abnormalities in placentation [3].

It is useful to define the periods of pregnancy loss in order to establish the relationship between miscarriage and APS. Preembryonic and embryonic losses happen before the 10th week of gestation and are frequent events in the general population, most cases due to genetic abnormalities [4]. APS is not a cause of sporadic early pregnancy loss [4]. However, recurrent (three or more) early pregnancy losses are more rare, and among other causes (genetic, hormonal, uterine abnormalities), thrombophilias, including APS, play a role. Fetal death, that is after the 10th week of gestation, is an infrequent event in the general population. APS is an important cause of fetal death, which is considered more specific of Hughes syndrome than recurrent early miscarriage. An early work in 1988 showed that women with aCL tend to lose their babies a mean of 4 weeks later than controls [5]. More recently, a study including 366 women with two or more pregnancy losses showed that among women with aCL at medium to high titers and/or LA, 50% of losses were fetal deaths, in contrast to 10% in women who were aPL-negative [6].

Apart from the clinical history, isotype and levels of anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) are important in taking clinical decisions. Low-titer aCL have a questionable association with features of APS, including recurrent miscarriage [7], for this reason they are not considered in the laboratory criteria for the classification of definite APS [8]. Women with persistent medium-high titers aCL, particularly of the IgG isotype, and/or lupus anticoagulant (LA) are at the other end of the spectrum. Specifically, those with a history of fetal death and high levels aCL IgG have a 80% risk of a new fetal death in the next pregnancy [9]. Another important point to consider is the previous obstetric history of the patients. In fact, previous miscarriage or fetal death is the strongest predictor of further complications in women with APS [10], [11], [12], [13]. On the other hand, the significance of aPL found in women without a history of obstetric complications or other features of APS is not well established, most women in this group having uneventful pregnancies even when untreated [14], [15].

Finding the best therapy for APS-related pregnancy loss has generated much data during the last decade, with 8 controlled trials published studying women with recurrent miscarriage and aPL (see Table 1). However, although these studies have clarified some points, the optimal treatment of pregnancy complications of Hughes syndrome is still far from clear. As Branch [16] has pointed out, the major limitation for solid conclusions is that studies have frequently combined populations with different conditions: patients with definite APS, with medium-high titers aCL and LA and history of fetal deaths, are mixed with women with recurrent early miscarriage and aCL at low levels. Indeed, a recent systematic review including 7 of these trials [17] has reached very limited conclusions.

Section snippets

Prednisone

Once the link between aPL and miscarriage was established, initial therapeutic efforts were directed to suppressing antibody production [18]. The combination prednisone-aspirin was used with good results in terms of pregnancy success, which were attributed to corticosteroids [19]. However, prednisone was not effective in preventing miscarriage, rather it was associated with a significant number of side effects [11]. Two randomised controlled trials were then designed to investigate the pros and

Conclusions

Treating pregnant women with APS is a complex issue. The use of heparin in women with a history of thrombosis who receive long-term oral anticoagulants is accepted, although such a population has been specifically excluded from most trials. For the rest, no general evidence-based recommendations can be offered, given the weakness of published randomised trials and the generally good results reported in series of women treated with different therapeutic schemes [10], [23], [27], [33]. Therefore,

References (34)

  • R.K. Silver et al.

    Comparative trial of prednisone plus aspirin vs. aspirin alone in the treatment of anticardiolipin antibody-positive obstetric patients

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (1993)
  • W.H. Kutteh

    Antiphospholipid antibody-associated recurrent pregnancy loss: treatment with heparin and low-dose aspirin is superior to low-dose aspirin alone

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (1996)
  • N.S. Pattison et al.

    Does aspirin have a role in improving pregnancy outcome for women with the antiphospholipid syndrome? A randomised controlled trial

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (2000)
  • G. Ruiz-Irastorza et al.

    Aspirin to treat obstetric manifestations of the antiphospholipid syndrome (letter)

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (2001)
  • D.W. Branch et al.

    A multicenter, placebo-controlled pilot study of intravenous immune globulin treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome during pregnancy

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (2000)
  • A.E. Gharavi et al.

    Mechanisms of pregnancy loss in antiphospholipid syndrome

    Clin Obstet Gynecol

    (2001)
  • M.J. Kupferminc et al.

    Increased frequency of genetic thrombophilia in women with complications of pregnancy

    N Engl J Med

    (1999)
  • Cited by (28)

    • Managing lupus patients during pregnancy

      2009, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Rheumatology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, specific measures should be taken in women with aPL, particularly those with APS (i.e., with previous thrombosis and/or obstetric complications), LA or persistently high-levels of aCL. Low-dose aspirin should be taken by all women with aPL, if possible before conception [44], in order to decrease the risk of miscarriage [45] and, as shown earlier, pre-eclampsia [43]. Heparin at full anti-thrombotic doses is given to women with previous thrombosis, since warfarin is contraindicated during organogenesis and is complicated to manage later, with an increased risk of foetal bleeding [46].

    • The treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome: A harmonic contrast

      2007, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Rheumatology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although the small sample size and the resulting wide confidence intervals do not completely exclude superiority of one of the arms, the more convenient and safer profile of LMWH and the similar behaviour of both types of heparin as antithrombotic drugs and make LMWH the first-line option. In conclusion, although routine use of heparin plus aspirin is generally advocated for all pregnant women with APS and an adverse obstetric history, this approach is not supported by all the data.72–75 Combination treatment could be the first option in women with previous fetal losses, more typical of APS and with a greater impact on the mother, although these patients are under-represented in the RCTs.

    • How we diagnose and treat thrombotic manifestations of the antiphospholipid syndrome: A case-based review

      2007, Blood
      Citation Excerpt :

      Such therapy is, however, not without risks and its benefit remains controversial.22 Management of the nonthrombotic manifestations of aPL has been recently reviewed and will not be further discussed here.23-25 This patient, however, is at significant risk for recurrent large-vessel venous thrombosis during and after her pregnancy if anticoagulants are not administered.

    • Antiphospholipid Syndrome in Pregnancy

      2007, Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the similar behavior of both types of heparin as antithrombotic drugs and the more convenient and safe profile of LMWH make the latter the first-line option. Although routine use of heparin plus aspirin generally is advocated for all pregnant women with APS and adverse obstetric history, this approach is not supported by unquestionable data [1,33–35]. Combination treatment could be the first option in women with previous fetal losses that are more typical of APS and with a greater impact on the mother, although these women are underrepresented in the RCTs.

    • Treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome in pregnancy

      2006, Seminarios de la Fundacion Espanola de Reumatologia
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text