Elsevier

Child Abuse & Neglect

Volume 22, Issue 4, April 1998, Pages 249-270
Child Abuse & Neglect

Commentary
Identification of Child Maltreatment With the Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scales: Development and Psychometric Data for a National Sample of American Parents

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(97)00174-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective: To create a parent-to-child version of the Conflict Tactics Scales, the CTSPC.

Method: Description of the conceptual and methodological approaches used and psychometric data for a nationally representative sample of 1,000 U.S. children.

Results: (1) Improved Psychological Aggression and Physical Assault scales. (2) New Nonviolent Discipline scale, supplementary scale for Neglect, and supplemental questions on discipline methods and sexual abuse. (3) Reliability ranges from low to moderate. (4) Evidence of discriminant and construct validity.

Conclusions: The CTSPC is better suited to measuring child maltreatment than the original CTS. It is brief (6 to 8 minutes for the core scales) and therefore practical for epidemiological research on child maltreatment and for clinical screening. Methodological issues inherent in parent self-report measures of child maltreatment are discussed.

Résumé

Objectif: Créer une version parent-enfant du Conflict Tactics Scale, la CTSPC.

Méthode: Descriptions des approches conceptuelles et méthodologiques utilisées et des données psychométriques pour un échantillon représentatif de 1000 enfants aux Etats-Unis.

Résultats: 1. Amélioration des échelles d’Aggression Psychologique et d’Attaque Physique. 2. Nouvelle échelle de Discipline non Violente, échelle supplémentaire de Négligence, et questions supplémentaires sur les méthodes de discipline et sur l’abus sexuel. 3. Taux de fiabilité de bas à moyen. 4. Preuves de validité discriminative.

Conclusions: Le CTSPC est plus à Même de mesurer les mauvais traitements que le CTS original. II est de courte durée (6 à 8 minutes pour les échelles majeures) et donc très pratique pour les recherches épicémiologiques sur les mauvais traitements ainsi que pour les évaluations cliniques. Les problèmes méthodologiques soulevés par les mesures d’auto-signalement par les parents en ce qui concerne les mauvais traitements sont discutés. Maarten Goedee

Resumen

Objetivo: Crear una versión de las Escalas de Tácticas Conflictivas (Conflict Tactics Scales, CTSPC) de padres-a-hijos.

Método: Descripción de los enfoques conceptuales y metodolóιcos utilizados y los datos psicométricos de una muestra nacional representativa de 1,000 niños de USA.

Resultados: (1) Escalas de Agresión psicolóιca y Asalto Fı́sico Mejoradas. (2) Nueva Escala de Disciplina No-Violenta, escala suplementaria de Negligencia, y preguntas suplementarias sobre métodos de disciplina y abuso sexual. (3) Rango de Confiabilidad de bajo a moderado. (4) Evidencia de validez discriminatoria y de construcción.

Conclusiones: El CTSPC está mejor equipado que el CTS original, para evaluar el maltrato infantil. Es breve (6 a 8 minutos para las escalas centrales) y por lo tanto práctico, para la investigación epidemiolóιca sobre maltrato infantil y para la evaluación clı́nica.

Introduction

Most research on physical and psychological maltreatment of children, and virtually all research on neglect, is based on cases obtained from treatment or judicial agencies. Despite the importance of these clinically based studies, only a small fraction of maltreatment cases are known to social or judicial agencies. Moreover, there is evidence from studies of alcoholism and other social and psychological problems that cases in the general population suffering from the same problem may differ from “clinical” cases in ways that affect treatment or prevention programs (Straus 1990b). Consequently, epidemiological research on child maltreatment in the general population is needed in addition to clinically based studies.

One of the requirements for epidemiological survey research on the general population is a practical method of ascertaining the presence and degree of maltreatment. The Conflict Tactics Scales or CTS (Straus 1979, Straus 1990a; Straus et al. 1996) was designed to meet that need. This paper describes a new version of the CTS called the Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scales (CTSPC). The CTSPC is intended to measure psychological and physical maltreatment and neglect of children by parents, as well as nonviolent modes of discipline.

The original CTS (to be called CTS1 from here on) has important limitations as a measure of child maltreatment (discussed in Straus and Hamby 1997). The limitations stem from the fact that the CTS1 was designed for use with partners in a marital, cohabiting, or dating relationship. To adapt it for measuring parental behavior, the main modification was to change the referent person from “your partner” to a specific child. Although the CTS1 has worked remarkably well as a measure of child maltreatment (see the review in Straus and Hamby 1997), some items were not really appropriate for parent-child relationships, and some important parental behaviors were not included.

A computer search for 1980 through 1996 revealed 132 publications that reported results from using the CTS1 to measure child maltreatment (see bibliography in Straus 1995). Most were based on data from responses by parents. A substantial number used the CTS1 to obtain recall data from adults about the behavior of their parents. Twenty-two studies were based on administration of the CTS1 to children ranging in age from 6 through 17. More important than frequency of use is the evidence accumulating from these studies of the concurrent and construct validity of the CTS1 as a measure of maltreatment of children (Straus and Hamby 1997; Yodanis et al. 1997).

An elementary but critically important indicator of validity is the fact that the rates of severe physical assault found by nine different investigators (summarized in Straus and Gelles 1990b, , part B) show that the CTS identifies many more cases than are known to child protective services (CPS). This is consistent with the long standing belief of CPS workers that there are many times more cases than are referred to them. A type of concurrent validity is the level of agreement between different members of the same family, such as the extent to which the report of a parent agrees with that of a child. Straus and Hamby 1997summarize the results of six such studies, each of which found substantial agreement. The most extensive evidence is on construct validity. Most of the studies located in our search provide evidence of construct validity because they report findings that are consistent with previously established empirical findings such as etiological links between physical abuse of children and stress (Eblen 1987) and depression (Campbell et al. 1997; Zuravin 1989) or between having experienced abuse and many kinds of maladaptive behavior such as delinquency and substance abuse (Miller et al. 1989), psychopathology (Dutton et al. 1996) and scores on the Child Abuse Potential Inventory (Caliso and Milner 1992).

The extent to which the CTS1 has been used in research on child maltreatment, despite its limitations, suggests that the revision described in this paper could make the CTSPC an even more useful instrument that the CTS1.

Section snippets

Theoretical Basis.

Despite important differences between the CTS1 and the CTSPC, the theoretical basis and mode of operationalization are fundamentally the same. The theoretical basis of the CTS is conflict theory (Adams 1965; Coser 1956; Dahrendorf 1959; Scanzoni 1972; Simmel 1955; Sprey 1979; Straus 1979). This theory assumes that conflict is an inevitable part of all human association, whereas physical assault as a tactic to deal with conflict is not (Coser 1956; Dahrendorf 1959). Consistent with this

The Gallup Survey

The data for this paper was obtained from a survey initiated and sponsored by the Gallup Organization as part of its National Social Audit Program (Gallup survey, #765). The authors of this paper all participated in the design of the questionnaire, including the design of the CTSPC. The interviews were pretested on a sample of 14 cases, and the wording of some items was revised to correct problems that were uncovered.

Prevalence and Chronicity

We will comment only briefly on the prevalence and chronicity statistics from the Gallup Survey because this is a methodological paper rather than a substantive report. But at least some consideration of these statistics is needed to evaluate the extent to which the CTSPC has been able to identify a meaningful pattern of parent behavior.

Reliability

A problem with the parent-child version of CTS1 that we hoped to remedy with the CTSPC is low internal consistency reliability. The alpha coefficients from seven analyses of the CTS1 data averaged .58 for the overall Physical Assault scale and .68 for the Psychological Aggression scale (Straus and Hamby 1997). The CTSPC alpha coefficients for the present sample of parents are similar: Overall Physical Assault scale = .55, Psychological Aggression = .60, Nonviolent Discipline = .70, and the new

Discriminant and Construct Validity

Evidence of construct validity occurs when a test is correlated with other variables for which there are theoretical or empirical grounds to expect an association (Campbell and Fiske 1959) and are not correlated when there are grounds for expecting the two variables to be uncorrelated. An overall judgment concerning construct validity takes many such linkages, including findings from different studies. An accumulated body of such evidence exists for the parent-to-child version of the CTS1 (see

Discussion

The Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scales (CTSPC) is a revision of the Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS) that is specifically focused on parental behavior. The modifications include:

  • Revision of the Psychological Aggression and Physical Assault scales to (1) improve clarity and age-appropriateness; (2) add items to increase content validity; (3) better differentiate between levels of severity of aggression by parents.

  • Replacement of the Reasoning scale by a Nonviolent Discipline scale.

  • New

Educational and Ethnic Group.

Although the CTSPC was designed to facilitate self-administration, it can be administered as a face-to-face or telephone interview. In revising the CTS we kept the vocabulary and sentence structure simple to make it applicable to a broad section of the population. The Flesch grade level measure (Flesch 1949) for the three basic scales (Nonviolent Discipline, Psychological Aggression, and Physical Assault) is 6th grade. If the supplemental scales (Neglect and Sexual Maltreatment) are included,

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements—The authors wish to express their appreciation to the Gallup Organization for the survey to obtain the data reported in this paper.

References (63)

  • D.T Campbell et al.

    Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1959)
  • J.C Campbell et al.

    Predictors of depression in battered women

    Violence Against Women

    (1997)
  • J.A Claes et al.

    Men who batter womenA study in power

    Journal of Family Violence

    (1990)
  • L Coser

    The functions of social conflict

    (1956)
  • W.G Dahlstrom et al.

    The Beck Depression InventoryItem order and the impact of response sets

    Journal of Personality Assessment

    (1990)
  • R Dahrendorf

    Class and class conflict in industrial society

    (1959)
  • F.W Dunford

    System-initiated warrants for suspects of misdemeanor domestic assaultA pilot study

    Justice Quarterly

    (1990)
  • D.G Dutton et al.

    Antecedents of abusive personality and abusive behavior in wife assaulters

    Journal of Family Violence

    (1996)
  • Eblen, C. N. (1987). The influence of stress and social support upon child abuse. Ph.D. Dissertation. Arizona State...
  • J.L Edleson et al.

    Relative effectiveness of group treatments for men who batter

    Social Work Research and Abstracts

    (1990)
  • J.L Edleson et al.

    The effects of group treatment for men who batterAn 18-month follow-up study

    Research on Social Work Practice

    (1991)
  • R Flesch

    The art of readable writing

    (1949)
  • D.A Ford

    Validity of using the Conflict Tactics scales in the Indianapolis prosecution experiment

  • Disciplining children in AmericaA Gallup Poll report

    (1995)
  • J Giles-Sims et al.

    Child, maternal and family characteristics associated with spanking

    Family Relations

    (1995)
  • E.W Gondolf et al.

    Court responses to petitions for civil protection orders

    Journal of Interpersonal Violence

    (1994)
  • E.W Gondolf et al.

    Characteristics of perpetrators of family and nonfamily assaults

    Hospital and Community Psychiatry

    (1990)
  • Hamberger, K. L., & Hastings, J. E. (1986). Characteristics of male spouse abusers: Is psychopathology part of the...
  • M.E Johnston

    Correlates of early violence experience among men who are abusive toward female mates

  • E.M Kinard

    Perceived social support and competence in abused childrenA longitudinal perspective

    Journal of Family Violence

    (1995)
  • D.J Kolko et al.

    Children’s perspectives in the assessment of family violencePsychometric characteristics and comparison to parent reports

    Child maltreatment

    (1996)
  • Cited by (1854)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The research was funded by National Institute of Mental Health grant T32MH15161 and the University of New Hampshire. This paper is a publication of the Measurement Research Program of the Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire. A list of publications on measurement will be sent on request.

    View full text