Original article
Anxiety and depressive symptom identification using the Duke Health Profile

https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(95)00037-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Duke Health Profile (DUKE) subscales were compared for their ability to identify anxiety and depressive symptoms as measured by the State Anxiety Inventory (SAI) and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in 413 primary care patients. The seven-item Duke Anxiety-Depression Scale (DUKE-AD) was the best symptom identifier, with sensitivities and specificities greater than 70% for high scores on both the SAI and CES-D. Also, baseline DUKE-AD scores predicted five clinical outcomes during an 18-month follow-up period, with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve areas ranging from 57.1 to 58.7%. Patients shown by DUKE-AD scores to be at high risk (>30, scale 0–100) for symptoms of anxiety and/or depression were more often women, less well-educated, not working, and with lower socioeconomic status. Their severity of illness was higher than that of low-risk patients. Although the providers did not know which patients were at high risk, they made a clinical diagnosis of anxiety or depression more often in high-risk patients.

References (43)

  • W Katon

    The epidemiology of depression in medical care

    Intl J Psych Med

    (1987)
  • M Von Korff et al.

    Anxiety and depression in a primary care clinic

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (1987)
  • HC Schulberg et al.

    Mental disorders in primary care: Epidemiologic, diagnostic, and treatment research directions

    Gen Hosp Psychiatry

    (1988)
  • L Eisenberg

    Treating depression and anxiety in primary care. Closing the gap between knowledge and practice

    N Engl J Med

    (1992)
  • AJ Frances et al.

    The development of DSM-IV

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (1989)
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

  • W Katon et al.

    Mixed anxiety and depression

    J Abn Psychol

    (1991)
  • RE Zinbarg et al.

    Mixed anxiety-depression: A new diagnostic category?

  • RE Zinbarg et al.

    The DSM-IV field trial for mixed anxiety depression

    Am J Psychiatry

    (1994)
  • WWK Zung

    A rating instrument for anxiety disorders

    Psychosomatics

    (1971)
  • CD Spielberger
  • AT Beck et al.

    An inventory for measuring depression

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (1961)
  • WWK Zung

    A self-rating depression scale

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (1965)
  • LS Radloff

    The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population

    Appl Psychol Meas

    (1977)
  • MA Burnam et al.

    Development of a brief screening instrument for detecting depressive disorders

    Med Care

    (1988)
  • D Goldberg et al.

    A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire

    Psychol Med

    (1979)
  • CT Veit et al.

    The structure of psychological distress and well-being in general populations

    J Consult Clin Psychol

    (1983)
  • DM Berwick et al.

    Performance of a five-item mental health screening test

    Med Care

    (1991)
  • WE Broadhead et al.

    Validation of the SDDS-PC Screen for multiple mental disorders in primary care

    Arch Fam Med

    (1995)
  • RL Spitzer et al.

    The PRIME-MD 1000 Study

  • M Bergner et al.

    The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure

    Med Care

    (1981)
  • Cited by (37)

    • Use of health-related indices and classification methods in medical data

      2019, Classification Techniques for Medical Image Analysis and Computer Aided Diagnosis
    • Gender differences in the association between depressive mood and mortality: A 12-year follow-up population-based study

      2012, Journal of Affective Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      Depressive mood was measured using the Duke Health Profile questionnaire (Parkerson et al., 1990), which was designed for self-administration, adapted and validated in French according to psychometric standards (Guillemin et al., 1997). The Duke Health Profile questionnaire has been shown to be an effective screener for clinical depression in primary care against both the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale (Parkerson et al., 1996) and the criteria of the Diagnosis and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Revised Third Edition (Parkerson and Broadhead, 1997). The instructions were: ‘Here are some questions about your health and feelings.

    • A survey of treatment practices and burden of lymphoedema in Togo

      2007, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
    • Factors That Affect the Number of Tender Points in Fibromyalgia and Chronic Widespread Pain Patients Who Did not Meet the ACR 1990 Criteria for Fibromyalgia: Are Tender Points a Reflection of Neuropathic Pain?

      2006, Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, they were asked about migraine or tension headache, Raynaud phenomenon, and irritable bowel syndrome. In the second part of the study, 152 consecutive patients were administered the Duke-Anxiety Depression (Duke-AD) scale (7), and the physical function items of the FM impact questionnaire (FIQ) scale (8). The Duke-AD is the 7-item anxiety-depression subscale of the DUKE that has been validated separately as a screening instrument for anxiety and depression.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Completion of the DUSOI Checklists at the time of patient visits was performed by W. E. Broadhead, M.D., Ph.D., James W. R. Harding III, M.D., M.P.H., Janet Jezsik, P.A.-C., Todd Shapley-Quinn, M.D., and Bret C. Williams, M.D., M.P.H. Funding was provided by Glaxo, Inc. (Research Triangle Park, NC) and the Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center.

    View full text