Original contribution
Bone marrow imaging using STIR at 0.5 and 1.5 T

https://doi.org/10.1016/0730-725X(92)90477-HGet rights and content

Abstract

We retrospectively examined MR images in 82 patients to evaluate the usefulness of short inversion time inversion recovery (STIR) in bone marrow imaging at 0.5 and 1.5 T. The study included 56 patients at 1.5 T and 26 patients at 0.5 T with a variety of pathologic bone marrow lesions (principally oncological), and compared the contrast and image quality of STIR imaging with spin-echo short repetition time/echo time (TRTE), long TRTE, and gradient-echo sequences. The pulse sequences were adjusted for optimal image quality, contrast, and fat nulling. STIR appears especially useful for the evaluation of red marrow (e.g., spine), where contrast between normal and infiltrated marrow is greater than with either gradient-echo or T1-weighted images. STIR is also extremely sensitive for evaluation of osteomyelitis, including soft tissue extent. In more peripheral (yellow) marrow, T1-weighted images are usually as sensitive as STIR. Limitations of STIR include artifacts, in particular motion artifact that at high field strength necessitates motion compensation. At 0.5 T, however, motion compensation is usually not necessary. Also, because of extreme sensitivity to water content, STIR may overstate the margins of a marrow lesion. With these limitations in mind, STIR is a very effective pulse sequence at both 0.5 and 1.5 T for evaluation of marrow abnormalities.

References (20)

  • I.R. Young

    Special pulse sequences and techniques

  • G.M. Bydder et al.

    MR imaging: Clinical use of the inversion recovery sequence

    J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.

    (1985)
  • E.C. Unger et al.

    MR imaging of bone marrow disease using STIR

    Radiology

    (1987)
  • B.A. Porter et al.

    Low-field STIR imaging of marrow malignancies

    Radiology

    (1987)
  • W.P. Shuman et al.

    Comparison of STIR and spin-echo imaging at 1.5 T in 45 suspected extremity tumors: Lesion conspicuity and extent

    Radiology

    (1991)
  • B.A. Porter et al.

    STIR imaging of lymphadenopathy: Advantages over conventional spin-echo techniques

    Radiology

    (1987)
  • M.R. Paling et al.

    Liver metastases: Optimization of MR imaging pulse sequences at 1.0 T

    Radiology

    (1988)
  • W.P. Shuman et al.

    Comparison of STIR and spin-echo MR imaging at 1.5 T in 90 lesions of the chest, liver and pelvis

    AJR

    (1989)
  • W.R.K. Smoker et al.

    The role of MR imaging in evaluating metastatic spinal disease

    AJNR

    (1987)
  • F.X.J. Fruehwald et al.

    Magnetic resonance imaging of the lower vertebral column in patients with multiple myeloma

    Invest. Radiol.

    (1988)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

Present address: Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115.

View full text