Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Beyond Return to Work: Testing a Measure of at-work Disability in Workers with Musculoskeletal Pain

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: There are a limited number of validated measures of a patient’s perception of the level of difficulty that they are having at their job. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the 16-item Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ-16). Methods: A sample of 42 workers reporting to a workplace occupational health unit with upper limb or low back pain were enrolled in an observational study. Participants were assessed at baseline, 4 and 12 weeks post reporting. Psychometric testing (distributions, Cronbach’s alpha, construct validity and responsiveness to change in problem and pain) was done using the baseline and 12-week data. Results: The WLQ-16 had evidence of internal consistency, construct validity and responsiveness. Some ceiling effect was found in the domains of mental-interpersonal and output demands. Physical demands suffered from missing values in 18/42 due to not-applicable content. Construct validity revealed that there was less discrimination at the higher (less limited) end of the scale. Responsiveness was present, though less than found with other measures of function and pain. Conclusions: The WLQ-16 shows promise as a measure of at-work disability. Further testing to evaluate the ceiling effect and responsiveness to constructs of change more closely related to work disability is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WF Stewart JA Ricci C. Leotta (2004) ArticleTitleHealth-related lost productive time (LPT): Recall interval and bias in LPT estimates J Occ Environ Med 46 S12–S22 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.jom.0000126685.59954.55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. G Gilworth AM Chamberlain A Harvey A Woodhouse J Smith GM Smyth et al. (2003) ArticleTitleDevelopment of a work instability scale for rheumatoid arthritis Arthritis Rheum 49 349–354 Occurrence Handle10.1002/art.11114 Occurrence Handle12794790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. LI Boden EA Biddle EA. Spieler (2001) ArticleTitleSocial and economic impacts of workplace illness and injury: Current and future directions for research Am J Ind Med 40 398–402 Occurrence Handle10.1002/ajim.10013 Occurrence Handle11598990

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. R Loeppke PA Hymel JH Lofland L Pizzi DL Konicki GW Anstadt et al. (2003) ArticleTitleHealth-related workplace productivity measurement: General and migraine-specific recommendations from the ACOEM expert panel J Occ Environ Med 45 349–359 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.jom.0000063619.37065.e2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. SMM Verstappen JWJ Bijlsma H Verkleij E Buskens AAM Blaauw EJ Ter Borg et al. (2004) ArticleTitleOverview of work disability in rheumatoid arthritis patients as observed in cross-sectional and longitudinal surveys Arthritis Rheum 51 488–497 Occurrence Handle10.1002/art.20419 Occurrence Handle15188338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. M Prasad P Wahlqvist R Shikiar Y. Shih (2004) ArticleTitleA review of self-report instruments measuring health-related work productivity. A patient-reported outcomes perspective Pharmacoeconomics 22 225–244 Occurrence Handle14974873

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. JH Lofland L Pizzi KD. Frick (2004) ArticleTitleA review of health-related workplace productivity loss instruments Pharmacoeconomics 22 165–184 Occurrence Handle14871164

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Scottsdale AZ. (2001) Measuring employee productivity: A guide to self-assessment tools. Institute for Health and Productivity Management

  9. RC Kessler M Ames PA Hymel R Loeppke DK McKenas DE Richling et al. (2004) ArticleTitleUsing the World Health Organization Health and work performance questionnaire (HPQ) to evaluate the indirect workplace costs of illness J Occ Environ Med 46 S23–S37 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.jom.0000126683.75201.c5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. TJ Mayne K Howard PW. Brandt-Rauf (2004) ArticleTitleMeasuring and evaluating the effects of disease on workplace productivity J Occ Environ Med 46 S1–S2 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.jom.0000126688.57275.6d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D Lerner BC Amick SuffixIII WH Rogers S Malspeis K Bungay D. Cynn (2001) ArticleTitleThe work limitations questionnaire Med Care 39 72–85 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00005650-200101000-00009 Occurrence Handle11176545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. D Lerner DA Adler H Chang ER Berndt JT Irish L Lapitsky et al. (2004) ArticleTitleThe clinical and occupational correlates of work productivity loss among employed patients with depression J Occ Environ Med 46 S46–S55 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.jom.0000126684.82825.0a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Sullivan (2004) ArticleTitleMaking the business case for health and productivity management J Occ Environ Med 46 S56–S61 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.jom.0000126686.67578.eb

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. BC Amick SuffixIII RV Habeck J Ossmann AH Fossel R Keller JN. Katz (2004) ArticleTitlePredictors of successful work role functioning after carpal tunnel release surgery J Occup Environ Med 46 490–499 Occurrence Handle15167398

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. D Lerner CA Benjamin JC Lee T Rooney WH Rogers H Chang et al. (2003) ArticleTitleRelationship of employee-reported work limitations to work productivity Med Care 41 649–659 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00005650-200305000-00012 Occurrence Handle12719689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. BC Amick SuffixIII D Lerner WH Rogers T Rooney JN. Katz (2000) ArticleTitleA review of health-related work outcome measures and their uses, and recommended measures Spine 25 3152–3160 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00007632-200012150-00010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. WO Spitzer FE LeBlanc M Dupuis L Abenhaim AY Belanger R Bloch et al. (1987) ArticleTitleScientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders: A monograph for clinicians. Report of the Quebec task force on spinal disorders Spine 12 IssueID7S s4–s55

    Google Scholar 

  18. WO Spitzer ML Skovron LR Salmi JD Cassidy J. Duranceau S. Suissa E. Zeiss (1995) ArticleTitleScientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: Redefining “whiplash” and its management Spine 20 IssueID8S 1S–73S Occurrence Handle7604354

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. P Cote JD Cassidy L Carroll JW Frank CA Bombardier (2001) ArticleTitlesystematic review of the prognosis of acute whiplash and a new conceptual framework to synthesize the literature Spine 26 E445–E458 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00007632-200110010-00020 Occurrence Handle11698904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. P Cote S Hogg-Johnson JD Cassidy L Carroll JW. Frank (2001) ArticleTitleThe association between neck pain intensity, physical functioning, depressive symptomatology and time-to-claim-closure after whiplash J Clin Epidemiol 54 275–286 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00319-X Occurrence Handle11223325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. DE. Beaton (1995) Examining the clinical course of work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity using the Ontario Workers’ Compensation Board administrative database University of Toronto Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  22. DE Beaton JG Wright JN Katz P Amadio C Bombardier DC Cole et al. (2005) ArticleTitleDevelopment of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches J Bone Joint Surg – American 87 1038–1046 Occurrence Handle10.2106/JBJS.D.02060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. M Roland R. Morris (1983) ArticleTitleA study of the natural history of back pain – part I: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain Spine 8 IssueID2 141–144 Occurrence Handle6222486

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. M Roland J. Fairbank (2000) ArticleTitleThe Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire Spine 25 3115–3124 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00007632-200012150-00006 Occurrence Handle11124727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. K Lorig RL Chastain E Ung SM Shoor HR. Holman (1989) ArticleTitleDevelopment and evaluation of a scale to measure perceived self-efficacy in people with arthritis Arthritis Rheum 32 37–44 Occurrence Handle2912463

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. CA McHorney AR. Tarlov (1995) ArticleTitleIndividual patient monitoring in clinical practice: Are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 4 293 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01593882 Occurrence Handle7550178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. RF. DeVellis (1996) ArticleTitleA consumer’s guide to finding, evaluating, and reporting on measurement instruments Arthritis Rheum 9 239–245

    Google Scholar 

  28. JC Nunnally IH. Bernstein (1994) Validity. Psychometric Theory EditionNumber3 McGraw-Hill New York 83–113

    Google Scholar 

  29. C Bombardier J Hayden DE. Beaton (2001) ArticleTitleMinimal clinically important difference. Low back pain: Outcome measures J Rheumatol. 28 431–438 Occurrence Handle11246692

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. RA Deyo M Battie AJ Beurskens C Bombardier P Croft BW Koes et al. (1999) ArticleTitleOutcome measures for low back pain research: A proposal for standardized use Spine 23 2003–2013 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00007632-199809150-00018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. PW Stratford J Binkley P Soloman E Finch C Gill J. Moreland (1996) ArticleTitleDefining the minimum level of detectable change for the Roland-Morris questionnaire Phys Ther 76 359–368 Occurrence Handle8606899

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. DE Beaton JN Katz AH Fossel V Tarasuk JG Wright C. Bombardier (2001) ArticleTitleMeasuring the whole or the parts Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the DASH Outcome Measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 14 128–146

    Google Scholar 

  33. DE Beaton AM Davis P Hudak S. McConnell (2001) ArticleTitleThe DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) Outcome Measure: What Do We Know about It Now? B J Hand Ther 6 109–118

    Google Scholar 

  34. S Solway DE Beaton S McConnell C. Bombardier (2002) The DASH Outcome Measure: User’s Manual EditionNumber2 Institute for Work & Health Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  35. AF De Bruin JPM Diederiks LP De Witte FCJ Stevens H. Philipsen (1997) ArticleTitleAssessing the responsiveness of a functional status measure: The Sickness Impact Profile versus the SIP68 J Clin Epidemiol 50 529–540 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00047-4 Occurrence Handle9180645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. DE Beaton C Bombardier JN Katz JG. Wright (2001) ArticleTitleA taxonomy for responsiveness J Clin Epidemiol 54 1204–1217 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00407-3 Occurrence Handle11750189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. RA Deyo DL. Patrick (1995) ArticleTitleThe significance of treatment effects: The clinical perspective Med Care 33 AS286–AS291 Occurrence Handle7723457

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. E Lydick RS. Epstein (1993) ArticleTitleInterpretation of quality of life changes Qual Life Res 2 221 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00435226 Occurrence Handle8401458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. RA Deyo RM. Centor (1986) ArticleTitleAssessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: An analogy to diagnostic test performance J Chronic Dis 39 IssueID11 897–906

    Google Scholar 

  40. J. Cohen (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences EditionNumber1 Academic Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  41. JG Wright NL. Young (1998) ArticleTitleA comparison of different indices of responsiveness J Clin Epidemiol 50 239–246 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00373-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. JN Katz MG Larson CB Phillips AH Fossel MH. Liang (1992) ArticleTitleComparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments Med Care 30 IssueID10 917–925 Occurrence Handle1405797

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. JC Nunnally IH. Bernstein (1994) Psychometric Theory EditionNumber3 McGraw-Hill, Inc. Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  44. DE Beaton DC Cole M Manno C Bombardier S Hogg-Johnson HS. Shannon (2000) ArticleTitleDescribing the burden of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders in newspaper workers: What difference do case definitions make? J Occup Rehab 10 39–53 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1009489712094

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dorcas E. Beaton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beaton, D.E., Kennedy, C.A. & the Workplace upper extremity research group. Beyond Return to Work: Testing a Measure of at-work Disability in Workers with Musculoskeletal Pain. Qual Life Res 14, 1869–1879 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-3865-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-3865-9

Keywords:

Navigation