Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An examination of coping styles and expectations for whiplash injury in Germany: comparison with Canadian data

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cross-sectional cohort study: to examine concurrent expectations and coping style for whiplash injury in injury-naive subjects in Germany. Studies suggest the recovery rate from whiplash injury may be faster in Germany than in Canada. Canadians have a high expectation for chronic pain following whiplash injury and Germans do not. Expectation of recovery not only predicts recovery in whiplash victims but is also known to correlate with coping style. The Vanderbilt Pain Management Inventory was administered to university students and staff in Germany. Subjects who had not yet experienced whiplash injury were given a vignette concerning a neck sprain (whiplash injury) in a motor vehicle collision and were asked to indicate how likely they were to have thoughts or behaviours indicated in the coping style questionnaire. Subjects also completed expectation questionnaires regarding whiplash injury. Sixteen percent of subjects held an expectation of chronic neck or back pain after whiplash injury. The mean active coping style score was 27.4 ± 3.6 (40 is the maximum score for active coping). The mean passive coping style score was 27.0 ± 6.3 (50 is the maximum score for passive coping). Coping style scores and patterns were not different from those previously observed in Canadian studies, but there was no correlation between expectations and coping style among German subjects, a finding that differs from Canadian studies. Although expectations and coping styles may interact or be co-modifiers in the outcomes of whiplash injury in Canadian whiplash victims, in Germany, despite having similar coping styles to Canadians, the lack of expectation for chronic pain may be protective from the effect of passive coping styles. Further studies of coping style as an aetiologic factor in the chronic whiplash syndrome are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR, Cassidy JD, Duranceau J, Suissa S et al (1995) Scientific monograph of the Quebec task force on whiplash-associated disorders. Spine 20(suppl 8):1S–73S

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Holm LW, Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Hogg-Johnson S, Côté P, Guzman J et al (2009) The burden and determinants of neck pain in whiplash-associated disorders after traffic collisions: results of the bone and joint decade 2000–2010 task force on neck pain and its associated disorders. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 32(2 Suppl):S61–S69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferrari R, Schrader H (2001) The late whiplash syndrome. A biopsychosocial approach. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 71:722–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Richter M, Ferrari R, Krettek C, Otte D, Kuensebeck HW, Blauth M (2004) Correlation of clinical findings, collision parameters, and psychological factors in the outcome of whiplash-associated disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75:758–764

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonk A, Ferrari R, Giebel GD, Edelmann M, Huser R (2000) A prospective randomized, controlled outcome study of two trials of therapy for whiplash injury. J Musculoskelet Pain 8:123–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schnabel M, Ferrari R, Vassiliou T, Kaluza G (2004) A randomized, controlled outcome study of active mobilization versus collar therapy for whiplash injury. Emerg Med J 21:306–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pieske O, Weinhold T, Buck J, Piltz S (2010) Seniority of the first-treating doctor does not influence the outcome of acute whiplash injury: a prospective cohort study. Eur Spine J 19(10):1627–1634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferrari R, Russell AS (2008) Whiplash: social interventions and solutions. J Rheumatol 35:2300–2302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Suissa S, Giroux M, Gervais M et al (2006) Assessing a whiplash management model: a population-based nonrandomized intervention study. J Rheumatol 33:581–587

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brison RJ, Hartling L, Pickett W (2000) A prospective study of acceleration-extension injuries following rear-end motor vehicle collisions. J Musculoskelet Pain 8:97–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cassidy JD, Carroll L, Cote P et al (2000) Effect of eliminating compensation for pain and suffering on the outcome of insurance claims for whiplash injury. N Engl J Med 342:1179–1186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Phillips LA, Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Côté P (2010) Whiplash-associated disorders: who gets depressed? Who stays depressed? Eur Spine J 19(6):945–956

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cote P, Cassidy JD, Carroll L, Frank JW, Bombardier C (2001) A systematic review of the prognosis of acute whiplash and a new conceptual framework to synthesize the literature. Spine 26(19):E445–E458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carroll LJ, Holm L, Ferrari R, Ozegovic D, Cassidy JD (2009) Recovery in whiplash-associated disorders: do you get what you expect? J Rheumatol 36:1063–1070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Côté P (2006) The role of pain coping strategies in prognosis after whiplash injury: passive coping predicts slowed recovery. Pain 124(1–2):18–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Buitenhuis J, Spanjer J, Fidler V (2003) Recovery from acute whiplash: the role of coping styles. Spine 28:896–901

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ferrari R, Russell AS (2010) Correlations between coping styles and symptom expectation for whiplash injury. Clin Rheumatol 29(11):1245–1249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferrari R, Lang C (2005) A cross-cultural comparison between Canada and Germany of symptom expectation for whiplash injury. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:92–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brown GK, Nicassio PM, Wallston KA (1989) Pain coping strategies and depression in rheumatoid arthritis. J Consult Clin Psychol 57:652–657

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Härkäpää K (1991) Relationships of psychological distress and health locus of control beliefs with the use of cognitive and behavioral coping strategies in low back pain patients. Clin J Pain 7:275–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rosenstiel AK, Keefe FJ (1983) The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients: relationship to patient characteristics and current adjustment. Pain 17:33–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Barron CR, Foxall MJ, Houfek JF (2005) Coping style and women's participation in breast and gynecological screening. Health Care Women Int 26(3):247–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Park CL, Adler NE (2003) Coping style as a predictor of health and well-being across the first year of medical school. Health Psychol 22:627–631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jones T, Rapport L, Hanks R, Lichtenberg P, Telmet K (2003) Cognitive and psychosocial predictors of subjective well-being in urban older adults. Clin Neuropsychol 17:3–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ramaekers D, Ector H, Demyttenaere K, Rubens A, Van de Werf F (1998) Association between cardiac autonomic function and coping style in healthy subjects. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 21:1546–1552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Castro WH, Meyer SJ, Becke ME, Nentwig CG, Hein MF, Ercan BI et al (2001) No stress–no whiplash? Prevalence of "whiplash" symptoms following exposure to a placebo rear-end collision. Int J Leg Med 114:316–322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, 13-103 Clinical Sciences Building, 11350-83 Avenue, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T6G 2P4

    Robert Ferrari

  2. Institute for Psychology, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany

    Stephanie Pieschl

Authors
  1. Robert Ferrari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephanie Pieschl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Ferrari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferrari, R., Pieschl, S. An examination of coping styles and expectations for whiplash injury in Germany: comparison with Canadian data. Clin Rheumatol 30, 1209–1214 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-011-1736-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-011-1736-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation