Skip to main content
Log in

Construct validity of the AIMS-2 upper limb function scales as a measure of disability in individuals with osteoarthritis of the hand

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to validate the use of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 (AIMS-2) Hand and Finger Function and Arm Function scales for assessing disability in persons with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hand. Ninety-nine subjects with hand OA completed the AIMS-2 scales, grip strength testing, and timed manipulation tasks. Confirmatory factor analyses determined that the ten items comprising the scales separated out into hand and arm limitations. Spearman correlations revealed the appropriate associations between Hand and Finger Function scale scores and grip strength (r = −0.37) and dexterity (r = 0.36). Arm Function scale scores discriminated individuals with additional upper limb involvement from those without (Mann–Whitney test, p < 0.01). Thus, convergent construct validity of the Hand and Finger Function scale and known-group validity of the Arm Function scale were shown. These AIMS-2 scales are valid and distinct measures of disability in individuals with hand OA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ACR:

American College of Rheumatology

AIMS:

Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales

AIMS-2:

Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales version 2

AUSCAN:

Australian/Canadian osteoarthritis hand index

CFI:

comparative fit index

TLI:

Tucker–Lewis index

RMR:

root mean square residual

RMSEA:

root mean square error of approximation

OA:

osteoarthritis

References

  1. Mason JH, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF (1988) A model of health status for rheumatoid arthritis: a factor analysis of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales. Arthritis Rheum 31:714–720

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Meenan RF, Mason JH, Anderson JJ et al (1992) AIMS2: the content and properties of a revised and expanded Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Health Status Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 35:1–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Kvien TK, Bellamy N (2005) Performance of the Norwegian version of AUSCAN—a disease-specific measure of hand osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 13:561–567

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dziedzic KS, Thomas E, Hay EM (2005) A systematic search and critical review of measures of disability for use in a population survey of hand osteoarthritis (OA). Osteoarthr Cartil 13:1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stamm T, Geyh S, Cieza A et al (2006) Measuring functioning in patients with hand osteoarthritis—content comparison of questionnaires based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Rheumatology 45:1534–1541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bellamy N, Klestov A, Muirden K et al (1999) Perceptual variation in categorizing individuals according to American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for hand, knee, and hip osteoarthritis (OA): observations based on an Australian twin registry study of OA. J Rheumatol 26:2654–2658

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fess EE (1992) Grip strength. In: The Society (ed) Clinical assessment recommendations. vol. 2. American Society of Hand Therapists, Chicago, pp 41–46

    Google Scholar 

  8. MacDermid JC, Mulé M (2001) Concurrent validity of the NK hand dexterity test. Physiother Res Int 6:83–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. MacDermid JC, Alyafi T, Richards RS, Roth JH (2001) Test–retest reliability of isometric strength and endurance grip tests performed on the Jamar and NK devices. Physiother Can 53:55–62

    Google Scholar 

  10. Turgeon TR, MacDermid JC, Roth JH (1999) Reliability of the NK dexterity board. J Hand Ther 12:7–15

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hu LT, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 6:1–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. MacDermid JC, Wessel J, Humphrey R, Roth JH (2007) Validity of self-report measures of pain and disability for persons who have undergone arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal joint of the hand. Osteoarthr Cartil 15:524–530

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Meghan Brenner, BHSc, for assistance with data collection and Dr. Joy MacDermid for providing access to the McMaster Hand Laboratory, funded in part by the Canadian Foundation for Innovation.

Disclosures

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norma J. MacIntyre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacIntyre, N.J., Wessel, J. Construct validity of the AIMS-2 upper limb function scales as a measure of disability in individuals with osteoarthritis of the hand. Clin Rheumatol 28, 573–578 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-009-1103-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-009-1103-5

Keywords

Navigation