Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Issues patients would like to discuss at their review consultation: variation by early and late stage oral, oropharyngeal and laryngeal subsites

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: The patient concerns inventory (PCI) was developed to help patients raise issues/concerns during routine follow-up and to indicate team members they want to see. This paper reports the use of the PCI across various H&N Cancer sub-sites (oral, oropharyngeal and laryngeal) and stages of disease (early and late) and describes the main concerns that patients want to discuss using a cross-sectional survey comprising the PCI with the University of Washington Quality of Life questionnaire. Patients treated for primary H&N squamous cell carcinoma, 1998–2009, were identified from the University Hospital Aintree H&N Cancer database. 447/775 (58 %) patients responded. Fear of recurrence concerns was common to all clinical groups (range 32–67 %). Speech issues were more common with laryngeal tumours, and saliva issues with oropharyngeal tumours (32 % early, 48 % late). Apart from early-stage laryngeal tumours, patients consistently reported issues concerning dental health/teeth and chewing. The median (IQR) number of concerns overall was 4 (2–7), with significant variation (p < 0.001) between clinical groups ranging from 2 (1–6) for early-stage oral to 6 (2–10) for late-stage oropharyngeal and 7 (5–9) late-stage laryngeal. The results indicated that PCI can be readily incorporated into managing HNC patients and supports a holistic multidisciplinary approach to clinic consultations. It accommodates difficult issues such as fear of recurrence and intimacy. Completion of the PCI by patients before consultation can highlight problems and concerns that doctors can target for discussion, thereby streamlining consultations, and ensuring that patient needs are better met, thus creating a more effective service.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cancer Research UK (2011). Latest UK cancer incidence year and mortality year summary—Counts. http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/. Accessed 23 Mar 2012

  2. Rowland JH, Aziz N, Tesauro G, Feuer E (2001) The changing face of cancer survivorship. Semin Oncol Nurs 17(4):236–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Velikova G, Booth L, Smith AB, Brown PM, Lynch P, Brown JM, Selby PJ (2004) Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 15:714–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rogers SN, Brown JS, Woolgar JA, Lowe D, Magennis P, Shaw RJ, Sutton D, Errington D, Vaughan D (2009) Survival following primary surgery for oral cancer. Oral Oncol 45(3):201–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Precious E, Haran S, Lowe D, Rogers SN (2012) Head and neck cancer patients’ perspective of carer burden. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50(3):202–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilbody S, House A, Sheldon T (2001) Routinely administered questionnaires for depression and anxiety: systematic review. BMJ 322(7283):406–409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Higginson I, Carr A (2001) Measuring quality of life: using quality of life measures in the clinical setting. BMJ 322:1297–1300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rogers SN, Clifford N, Lowe D (2011) Patient and carer unmet needs: a survey of the British association of head and neck oncology nurses. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:343–348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. DeBoer M, McCormick L, Pruyn J, Ryckman R, Borne BVD (1999) Physical and psychosocial correlates of head and neck cancer: a review of the literature. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120(3):427–436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sollner W, DeVries A, Steixner E, Lukas P, Sprinzl G, Rumpold G et al (2001) How successful are oncologists in identifying patient distress, perceived social support, and need for psychosocial counselling? Br J Cancer 84(2):179–185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rogers S, Lowe D (2009) Screening for dysfunction to promote multidisciplinary intervention by using the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 135(4):369–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rogers SN, El-Sheikha J, Lowe D (2009) The development of a patients concerns inventory (PCI) to help reveal patients concerns in the head and neck clinic. Oral Oncol 45(7):555–561

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rogers SN, Scott B, Lowe D, Ozakinci G, Humphris GM (2010) Fear of recurrence following head and neck cancer in the outpatient clinic. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267(12):1943–1949

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Flexen J, Ghazali N, Lowe D, Rogers SN (2012) Identifying appearance-related concerns in routine follow-up clinics following treatment for oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50(4):314–320

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghazali N, Kanatas A, Langley DJ, Scott B, Lowe D, Rogers SN (2011) Treatment referral before and after the introduction of the Liverpool patients concerns inventory (PCI) into routine head and neck oncology outpatient clinics. Support Care Cancer 19(11):1879–1886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wen KY, Gustafson DH (2004) Needs assessment for cancer patients and their families. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2:11 (Review)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kanatas AN, Rogers SN (2008) A guide of the questionnaires used in the measurement of health-related quality of life in head and neck oncology. Tumori 94(5):724–731

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rogers S, Ahad S, Murphy A (2007) A structured review and theme analysis of papers published on “quality of life” in head and neck cancer: 2000 to 2005. Oral Oncol 43(9):843–868

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sobin L, Wittekind C (eds) (2002) International union against cancer (UICC): TNM classification of malignant tumours, 6th edn

  20. Husein AB, Butterworth CJ, Ranka MS, Kwasnicki A, Rogers SN (2011) A survey of general dental practitioners in the North West of England concerning the dental care of patients following head and neck radiotherapy. Prim Dent Care 18(2):59–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Kanatas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kanatas, A., Ghazali, N., Lowe, D. et al. Issues patients would like to discuss at their review consultation: variation by early and late stage oral, oropharyngeal and laryngeal subsites. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270, 1067–1074 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2092-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2092-6

Keywords

Navigation