Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The presence of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) and rheumatoid factor on patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) does not interfere with the chance of clinical remission in a follow-up of 3 years

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Autoantibodies in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have important diagnostic value. The association between the presence of autoantibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptide and the response to treatment is controversial. To prospectively evaluate a cohort of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (<12 months of symptoms) in order to determine the association between serological markers (rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-citrullinated protein antibodies) such as anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP) and citrullinated anti-vimentin (anti-Sa) with the occurrence of clinical remission, forty patients diagnosed with early RA at the time of diagnosis were evaluated and followed for 3 years, in use of standardized therapeutic treatment. Demographic and clinical data were recorded, disease activity score 28 (DAS 28), as well as serology tests (ELISA) for RF (IgM, IgG, and IgA), anti-CCP (CCP2, CCP3, and CCP3.1) and anti-Sa in the initial evaluation and at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months of follow-up. The outcome evaluated was the percentage of patients with clinical remission, which was defined by DAS 28 lower than 2.6. Comparisons were made through the Student t test, mixed-effects regression analysis, and analysis of variance (significance level of 5%). The mean age was 45 years, and a female predominance was observed (90%). At the time of diagnosis, RF was observed in 50% of cases (RF IgA—42%, RF IgG—30%, and RF IgM—50%), anti-CCP in 50% (no difference between CCP2, CCP3, and CCP3.1) and anti-Sa in 10%. After 3 years, no change in the RF prevalence and anti-CCP was observed, but the anti-Sa increased to 17.5% (P = 0.001). The percentage of patients in remission, low, moderate, and intense disease activity, according to the DAS 28, was of 0, 0, 7.5, and 92.5% (initial evaluation) and 22.5, 7.5, 32.5, and 37.5% (after 3 years). There were no associations of the presence of autoantibodies in baseline evaluation and in serial analysis with the percentage of clinical remission during follow-up of 3 years The presence of autoantibodies in early RA has no predictive value for clinical remission in early RA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sokka T, Envalds M, Pincus T (2008) Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a global perspective on the use of antirheumatic drugs. Mod Rheumatol 18:228–239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Smolen JS, Aletaha D (2008) Activity assessments in rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 20:306–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boire G, Cossette P, de Brum-Fernandes AJ et al (2005) Anti-Sa antibodies and antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptide are not equivalent as predictors of severe outcomes in patients with recent-onset polyarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 7:R592–R603

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vázquez I, Graell E, Gratacós J, Cañete JD, Viñas O, Ercilla MG (2007) Prognostic markers of clinical remission in early rheumatoid arthritis after two years of DMARDs in a clinical setting. Clin Exp Rheumatol 25:231–238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Verschueren P, Esselens G, Westhovens R (2009) Predictors of remission, normalized physical function, and changes in the working situation during follow-up of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: an observational study. Scand J Rheumatol 23:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gossec L, Dougados M, Goupille P, Cantagrel A, Sibila J, Meyer O (2004) Prognostic factors for remission in early rheumatoid arthritis: a multiparameter prospective study. Ann Rheum Dis 63:675–680

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mancarella L, Bobbio-Pallavicini F, Ceccarelli F et al (2007) Good clinical response, remission, and predictors of remission in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with tumor necrosis factor alpha blockers: the GISEA study. J Rheumatol 34:1670–1673

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bas S, Genevay S, Meyer O, GAbay C (2003) Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, IgM and IgA rheumatoid factors in the diagnosis and prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 42:677–680

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Serdaroflu M, ÇakÂrbay H, Defer O, Cengiz S, Kul S (2008) The association of anti-CCP antibodies with disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int 28:965–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Escalona M, López-Longo FJ, Gozález CM et al (2002) Anti-Sa sera from patients with rheumatoid arthritis contain at least 2 different subpopulations of anti-Sa antibodies. J Rheumatol 29:2053–2060

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wagner E, Skoumal M, Bayer PM, Klausofer K (2009) Antibody against mutated citrullinated vimentin: a new sensitive marker in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int 29:1315–1321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Licia Maria Henrique da Mota.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

da Mota, L.M.H., dos Santos Neto, L.L., de Carvalho, J.F. et al. The presence of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) and rheumatoid factor on patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) does not interfere with the chance of clinical remission in a follow-up of 3 years. Rheumatol Int 32, 3807–3812 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-2260-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-2260-9

Keywords

Navigation