Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An open, randomized comparison study of cyclosporine A, cyclosporine A + methotrexate and cyclosporine A + hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of early severe rheumatoid arthritis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine whether a regimen of cyclosporine (CSA) and methotrexate (MTX), or CSA and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) introduced in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can produce a significant improvement in clinical outcome and/or retard radiographic damage in comparison with standard monotherapy with CSA alone.

Methods

One hundred five patients with active RA of less than 36 months duration, who had never previously been treated with immunosuppressive agents, were included in a 12-month, multi-center, open, randomized trial. Patients who fulfilled the criteria for early severe RA were randomized to receive either combination therapy (CSA+MTX n=34, CSA+HCQ n=35) or CSA alone (n=36).

Results

CSA+MTX was more effective than the other two treatment groups in controlling RA symptoms. CSA+MTX did not show a significant radiographic progression according to Larsen–Dale (0.90±3.89 compared to baseline values, P>0.05); moreover, patients treated with CSA alone or CSA+HCQ showed a significant worsening of Larsen–Dale score (2.91±5.99 and 2.97±4.28 respectively vs baseline values, P<0.05), although not significant when compared with the CSA+HCQ group (P=0.56 and 0.39, respectively).

Conclusions

This trial indicated that CSA+MTX was more effective than the other two treatments in improving clinical data and inhibiting radiographic progression, although the differences were not significant in this relatively small study. However, the difference was significant in favor of CSA+MTX regarding ACR 50% response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harris ED Jr (1990) Rheumatoid arthritis. Pathophysiology and implications for therapy. N Engl J Med 322:1277–1289

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hazes JM, Silman AJ (1990) Review of UK data on the rheumatic disease-2. Rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 29: 310–312

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mitchell JM, Burkhauser RV, Pincus T (1988) The importance of age, education, and comorbidity in the substantial earnings losses of individuals with symmetrical polyarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 31: 348–357

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vandenbroucke JP, Hazevoet HM, Cats A (1984) Survival and case of death in rheumatoid arthritis: a 25-year prospective follow-up. J Rheumatol 11: 158–161

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cash JM, Klippel JH (1994) Second-line drug therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 330: 1368–1375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Devlin J, Gough A, Huisson A, Perkins P, Holder R, Reece R Arthur V, Emery P (1997) The acute phase and function in early rheumatoid arthritis: C-reactive protein levels correlate with functional outcome. J Rheumatol 24:9–13

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Egsmose C, Lund B, Borg G, Petterson H, Berg E, Brodin U, Trang L (1995) Patients with rheumatoid arthritis benefit from early 2nd line therapy: 5-year follow-up of a prospective double blind controlled study. J Rheumatol 22:2208–2213

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fries JF, Williams CA, Morfeld D, Singh G, Sibley J (1996) Reduction in long-term disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis by disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-based treatment strategies. Arthritis Rheum 39:616–622

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Proudman SM, Conaghan PG, Richardson C, Griffiths B, Green MJ, McGonagle D, Wakefield RJ, Reece RJ, Miles S, Adebaio A, Gough A, Helliwell P, Martin M, Huston G, Pease C, Veale DJ, Isaacs J, van der Heide DM, Emery P (2000) Treatment of poor-prognosis early rheumatoid arthritis. A randomized study of treatment with methotrexate, cyclosporin A and intraarticular corticosteroids compared with sulfasalazine alone. Arthritis Rheum 43:1809–1819

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boers M, Verhoeven AC, Markusse HM, van de Laar MA, Westhovens R, van Denderen JC, van Zeben D, Dijkmans BA, Peeters AJ, Jacobs P, van den Brink HR, Schouten HJ, van der Heijde DM, Boonen A, van der Linden S (1997) Randomised comparison of combined step-down prednisolone, methotrexate and sulphasalazine with sulphasalazine alone in early rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 350:309–318

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tugwell P, Pincus T, Yocum D, Stein M, Gluck O, Kraag G, McKendrey R, Tesser J, Baker P, Wells G (1995) Combination therapy with cyclosporine and methotrexate in severe rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 333:137–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Elliott MJ, Maini RN, Feldmann M, Long-Fox A, Charles P, Katsikis P, Brennan FM, Walker J, Bijl H, Grayeb J (1993) Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with chimeric monoclonal antibodies to tumor necrosis factor. Arthritis Rheum 36:1681–1690

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maini R, St Clair EW, Breedveld F, Furst D, Kalden J, Weisman M, Smolen J, Emery P, Harriman G, Feldmann M, Lipsky P (1999) Infliximab (chimeric anti-tumour necrosis factor α monoclonal antibody) versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving concomitant methotrexate: a randomised phase III trial. Lancet 354:1932–1939

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sharp JT, Strand V, Leung H, Hurley F, Loew-Friedrich I (2000) Treatment with leflunomide slows radiographic progression of rheumatoid arthritis: results from three randomized controlled trials of lefluonomide in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Lefluonomide Rheumatoid Arthritis Investigators Group. Arthritis Rheum 43:495–505

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Elliott JF, Lin Y, Mizel SB, Bleackley RC, Harnish DG, Paetkau V (1984) Induction of interleukin 2 messenger RNA inhibited by cyclosporine A. Science 226:1439–1441

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Muraguchi A, Butler JL, Kehrol JH, Falkoff RJM, Fauci AS (1983) Selective suppression of an early step in human B cell activation by cyclosporin A. J Exp Med 158:690–702

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yocum D (1993) Immunological actions of cyclosporine A in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 32 (suppl 1):38–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bensen W, Tugwell P, Roberts RM, Ludwin D, Ross H, Grace E, Gent M (1994) Combination therapy of cyclosporine with methotrexate and gold in rheumatoid arthritis (2 pilot studies). J Rheumatol 21:2034–2038

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stein CM, Pincus T, Yocum D, Tugwell P, Wells G, Gluck O, Kraag G, Torley H, Tesser J, McKendrey R, Brooks RH (1997) Combination treatment of severe rheumatoid arthritis with cyclosporine and methotrexate for forty-eight weeks. Arthritis Rheum 40:1843–1851

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dawes PT, Tunn E, Fowler PD (1987) Combined gold and hydroxychloroquine in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol (suppl 1) 26:11–14

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cronstein BN (1996) Molecular therapeutics: methotrexate and its mechanism of action. Arthritis Rheum 16:662–666

    Google Scholar 

  22. Landewé RBM, Miltenburg AMM, Breedveld FC, Daha MR, Dijkmans BAC (1992) cyclosporine and chloroquine synergistically inhibit the interferon-γ production by CD4 positive and CD8 positive synovial T cell clones derived from a patient with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 19:1353–1357

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Salmeron G, Lipsky PE (1983) Immunosuppressive potential of antimalarials. Am J Med 75:19–24

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mackenzie AH, Scherbel AL (1980) Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in rheumatological therapy. Clin Rheum Dis 6:545–566

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ferraccioli GF, Bambara LM, Ferraris M, Perpigneno G, Cattaneo R, Porzio F, Accardo S, Mattara L, Zoppini A, Benucci M, Ostumi PA, Pasero G (1997) Effects of cyclosporin on joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 15 [Suppl 17] 83–89

  26. Pasero G, Priolo F, Marubini E, Fantini F, Ferraccioli G, Magarò M, Marcolongo R, Oriente P, Pipitone V, Portioli I, Tirri G, Trotta F, Della Casa-Alberighi O (1996) Slow progression of joint damage in early rheumatoid arthritis treated with cyclosporin A. Arthritis Rheum 37:1006–1015

    Google Scholar 

  27. FØrre Ø and the Norwegian Arthritis Study group (1994) radiologic evidence of disease modification in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with cyclosporin: results of a 48-week multicenter study comparing low-dose cyclosporin with placebo. Arthritis Rheum 37:1506–1512

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Drosos AA, Voulgari PV, Katsaraki A, Zikou AK (2000) Influence of cyclosporin A on radiological progression in early rheumatoid arthritis patients: a 42-month prospective study. Rheumatol Int 19:113–118

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kushner I, Dawson NV (1992) Changing perspectives in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol19:1831–1834

  30. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA (1988) The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 31:315–324

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M, Bombardier C, Chernoff M, Fried B, Furst D, Goldsmith C, Kieszak S, Lighfoot R (1993) The American College of Rheumatology preliminary core set of disease activity measures for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum 36:729–740

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M, Bombardier C, Furst D, Goldsmith C, Katz LM, Linghtfoot R Jr, Paulus H, Strand V (1995) The American College of Rheumatology preliminary definition of improvement in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 38: 727–735

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Larsen A, Dale K, Eek M (1977) Radiographic evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis and related conditions by standard reference films. Acta Radiol Diagn 18:481–491

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ranza R, Marchesoni A, Calori G, Bianchi G, Braga M, Canazza S, Canesi B, Fumagalli M, Mastaglio C, Mathieu A (1993) The Italian version of the functional disability index of the health assessment questionnaire. A reliable instrument for multicenter studies in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 11:123–128

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Fries JF, Spitz PW, Young DY (1992) The dimensions of health outcomes: the health assessment questionnaire, disability and pain scales. J Rheumatol 9: 789–793

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hochberg MC, Chang RW, Dwosh I, Lindsey S, Pincus T, Wolfe F (1992) The American college of Rheumatology Association 1991 revised criteria for the classification of global functional status in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 35: 498-502

    Google Scholar 

  37. Larsen A (1975) A radiologic method for grading the severity of rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 4:225–233

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Larsen A, Edgren J, Harju E, Laasonen L, Reitamo T (1979) Interobserver variation in the evaluation of radiologic changes of rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 8:109–112

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Larsen A (1999) How to apply Larsen score in evaluating radiographs of rheumatoid arthritis in long-term studies. J Rheumatol 10:1974–1975

    Google Scholar 

  40. Stuart AA (1955) A test for homogeneity of the marginal distributions in a two-way classification. Biometrica 42: 412–416

    Google Scholar 

  41. Paulus HE, Egger MJ, Ward JR, Williams HJ (1990) Analysis of improvement in individual rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, based on the findings in patients treated with placebo. The Cooperative Systematic Studies of Rheumatic Diseases Group. Arthritis Rheum 33: 477–484

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Jeurissen ME, Boerbooms AM, van de Putte LB, Doesburg WH, Lemmens AM (1991) Influence of methotrexate and azathioprine on radiologic progression in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Intern Med 114:999–1004

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Stenger AAME, van Leewen MA, Houtman PM, Bruyn GAW, Speestra F, Barendsen BC, Velthuysen E, van Rijswijk MH (1998) Early effective suppression of inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis reduces radiographic progression. Br J Rheumatol 37:1157–1163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Verhoven AC, Boers M, Tugwell P (1998) Combination therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: updated systematic review. Br J Rheumatol 37:612–619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Farr M, Bacon PA (1995) How and when should combination therapy be used? The role of anchor drug. Br J Rheumatol [Suppl 2] 34:100–103

  46. Panayi GS, Tugwell P (1994) The use of cyclosporin A in rheumatoid arthritis: conclusion of an international review. Br J Rheumatol 33 [Suppl 3] 967–969

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tugwell O, Baker P (1995) Guidelines for the use of cyclosporine in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 14 [Suppl 2] 37–41

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sarzi-Puttini, P., D’Ingianna, E., Fumagalli, M. et al. An open, randomized comparison study of cyclosporine A, cyclosporine A + methotrexate and cyclosporine A + hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of early severe rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int 25, 15–22 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-003-0384-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-003-0384-2

Keywords

Navigation