Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Normal anatomy of the heel entheses: anatomical and ultrasonographic study of their blood supply

  • Anatomic Bases of Medical, Radiological and Surgical Techniques
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was first to determine the normal blood supply of the heel entheses with cadaver injection, and second, to identify by means of ultrasound (US) this blood supply in healthy volunteers before and after the intravenous injection of a US contrast agent (SonoVue). Twenty cadaver lower limbs were cut into sagittal, coronal, or axial sections after the injection of a red-colored gelatin solution. Ten anatomical samples were selected for histology. Then 10 healthy volunteers were enrolled in a contrast-enhanced ultrasonography study (CUS). Calcaneal tendon and plantar aponeurosis entheses were studied first without any contrast-agent (B-mode, power Doppler). A single dose (2.4 ml) of the contrast agent was then administered for studying each enthesis of the right foot. The operators had to look for blood flow within the entheses and in the adjacent soft tissues. Anastomotic transverse branches were seen macroscopically at the back of the calcaneal tendon, giving some capillaries penetrating the enthesis. None of these vessels could be seen with CUS. In contrast, a high-density vascular network could be detected in Kager’s triangle with CUS. No blood vessel could be seen within the plantar aponeurosis enthesis, either macroscopically or microscopically. No evidence of entheseal vascularization was found with any contrast-enhanced imaging technique. Inferior branches of the lateral plantar artery were seen on coronal and sagittal sections of the hindfoot, and could be detected with CUS. These arterioles were running toward the anterior aspect of the calcaneal tuberosity, near the plantar aponeurosis insertion. In conclusion, no vascularization was detected with CUS at the cortical bone insertion of normal heel entheses. However, some vascularization could be seen in the immediate vicinity of heel entheses. The latter feature has to be kept in mind, as it may represent a pitfall for the diagnosis of early inflammatory changes in patients, especially those with seronegative spondylarthropathies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmed IM, Lagopoulos M, McConnell P, Soames RW, Sefton GK (1998) Blood supply of the Achilles tendon (1998) J Orthop Res 16:591–596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Benjamin M, McGonagle D (2001) The anatomical basis for disease localization in seronegative spondylarthropathy at entheses and related sites. J Anat 199:503–526

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Benjamin M, Kumai T, Milz S, Boszczyk BM, Boszczyk AA, Ralphs JR (2002) The skeletal attachment of tendons-tendons “entheses”. Comp Biochem Physiol A 133:931–945

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bokor D (2000) Diagnostic efficacy of SonoVue. Am J Cardiol 86[Suppl]:19G―24G

  5. Burgos-Vargas R, Pacheco-Tena C, Vazquez-Mellado J (2002) A short-term follow-up of enthesitis and arthritis in the active phase of juvenile onset of spondylarthropathies. Clin Exp Rheumatol 20:727–731

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Carotti M, Salaffi F, Manganelli P, Salera D, Simonetti B, Grassi W (2002) Power Doppler sonography in the assessment of synovial tissue of the knee joint in rheumatoid arthritis: a preliminary experience. Ann Rheum Dis 61:877–882

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carr AJ, Norris SH (1989) The blood supply of the calcaneal tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71:100–102

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Correas JM, Bridal L, Lesavre A, Méjean A, Claudon JM, Hélénon O (2001) Ultrasound contrast agents: properties, principles of action, tolerance, and artifacts. Eur Radiol 11:1316–1328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. D’Agostino MA, Breban M, Said-Nahal R, Dougados M (2002) Refractory inflammatory heel pain in spondylarthropathy: a significant response to infliximab documented by ultrasound. Arthritis Rheum 46:840–850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. D’Agostino MA, Breban M (2003) Besoin d’imagerie dans le diagnostic et le suivi des spondylarthropathies. In: Tendons et enthèses. GETROA opus XXX. Sauramps Medical, Montpellier, pp 123–127

  11. D’Agostino MA, Said-Nahal R, Hacquard-Bouder C, Brasseur JL, Dougados M, Breban M (2003) Assessment of peripheral enthesitis in the spondylarthropathies by ultrasound combined with power Doppler. A cross-sectional study. Arthritis Rheum 48:523–533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hau M, Kneitz C, Tony H-P, Keberle M, Jahns R, Jenett M (2002) High resolution ultrasound detects a decrease in pannus vascularization of small finger joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving treatment with soluble tumor necrosis factor α receptor (etanercept). Ann Rheum Dis 61:55–58

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hidalgo DA, Shaw WW (1986) Anatomic basis of plantar flap design. Plast Reconstr Surg 78:627–636

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kamel M, Eid H, Mansour R (2003) Ultrasound detection of heel enthesitis: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Rheumatol 30:774–778

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Klauser A, Frauscher F, Schirmer M, Halpern E, Pallwein L, Herold M, Helweg G, ZurNedden D (2002) The value of contrast-enhanced color Doppler ultrasound in the detection of vascularization of finger joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 46:647–653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lassau N, Koscielny S, Opolon P (2001) Evaluation of contrast-enhanced color Doppler ultrasound for the quantification of angiogenesis in vivo. Invest Radiol 36:50–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Magarelli N, Guglielmi G, Di Matteo L, Tartaro A, Mattei PA, Bonomo L (2001) Diagnostic utility of an echo-contrast agent in patients with synovitis using power Doppler ultrasound: a preliminary study with comparison to contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur Radiol 28:1039–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McGonagle D, Gibbon W, Emery P (1998) Classification of inflammatory arthritis by enthesitis. Lancet 352:1137–1140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McGonagle D, Marzo-Ortega H, O’Connor P, Gibbon W, Hawkey P, Henshaw K, Emery P (2002) Histological assessment of the early enthesitis lesion in spondylarthropathy. Ann Rheum Dis 61:534–537

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Qvistgaard E, Røgind H, Terslev L, Danneskiold-Samsøe B, Bliddal H (2001). Quantitative ultrasonography in rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation of inflammation by Doppler technique. Ann Rheum Dis 60:690–693

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rizzatto G, Martegani A, Chersevani R, Macorig D, Vrtovec M, Alani L, Tufarulo L (2001) Importance of staging of breast cancer and role of contrast ultrasound. Eur Radiol 11[Suppl 3]:E47―E52

  22. Sanz-Hospital FJ, Martin CM, Escalera J, Llanos LF (1997) Achilleo-calcaneal vascular network. Foot Ankle Int 18:506–509

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schmidt-Rohlfing B, Graf J, Schneider U, Niethard FU (1992) The blood supply of the Achilles tendon. Int Orthop 16:29–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schneider M, Arditi M, Barrau MB, Brochot J, Broillet A, Ventrone R, Yan F (1995) BR1: a new ultrasonographic contrast agent based on sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubbles. Invest Radiol 30:451–457

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stein V, Laprell H, Tinnemeyer S, Petersen W (2000) Quantitative assessment of intravascular volume of the human Achilles tendon. Acta Orthop Scand 71:60–63

    Google Scholar 

  26. Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Strandberg C, Klarlund M, Klausen T, Østergaard M (2001) Power Doppler ultrasonography for assessment of synovitis in the metacarpophalangeal joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A comparison with dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum 44:2018–2023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Terslev L, Top-Pedersen S, Qvistgaard E, Danneskiold-Samsøe B, Bliddal H (2003) Estimation of inflammation by Doppler ultrasound: quantitative changes after intra-articular treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 62:1049–1053

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wakefield RJ, Brown AK, O’Connor PJ, Emery P (2003) Power Doppler sonography: improving disease activity assessment in inflammatory musculoskeletal disease. Arthritis Rheum 48:285–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Weidekamm C, Köller M, Weber M, Kainberger F (2003) Diagnostic value of high-resolution B-mode and Doppler sonography for imaging of hand and finger joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 48:325–333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zantop T, Tillmann B, Petersen W (2003) Quantitative assessment of blood vessels of the human Achilles tendon: an immunohistochemical cadaver study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 123:501–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Contrast agents were donated by Bracco Spa, Milan, Italy. We thank Philips, Washington, USA, for the loan of the ATL-HDI 5000 ultrasonographic equipment (MVI software). The authors thank Mr. Vianney Lethuc for the optimization of the US protocol, and Mr. Patrick Devos and Miss Carole Boutron for the statistical analysis. Our study was performed according to the Huriet Serusclat law (20 December 1988) and approved by our institutional review board.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Morel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morel, M., Boutry, N., Demondion, X. et al. Normal anatomy of the heel entheses: anatomical and ultrasonographic study of their blood supply. Surg Radiol Anat 27, 176–183 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-004-0311-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-004-0311-6

Keywords

Navigation