Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sensitivity of lateral view cervical spine radiographs taken in the neutral position in atlantoaxial subluxation in rheumatic diseases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The value of lateral view cervical spine radiography in various positions of the neck was assessed in patients with rheumatoid atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS). We wanted to find out how much information is lost if only neutral position radiographs are used. The series consisted of 65 rheumatoid patients with unstable AAS. Lateral view cervical spine radiographs were taken in the neutral position and during flexion and extension. Neutral position radiographs would have failed to confirm the diagnosis of AAS in 31 cases (48%) and would have failed to record its true severity in 43 cases (66%); their diagnostic sensitivity was 52%. The sensitivity of the neutral radiographs in showing the reversibility of AAS was 48%. Routine cervical spine radiography of rheumatoid patients should include lateral view radiographs taken during flexion and extension. The result may be applied to magnetic resonance imaging, which is usually performed in the neutral position.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agarwal AK, Peppelman WC Jr, Kraus DR, Eisenbeis CH Jr. The cervical spine in rheumatoid arthritis. Br Med J 1993;306:79–80.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bland JH. Rheumatoid arthritis of the cervical spine. J Rheumatol 1974;1:319–42.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Halla JT, Hardin JG, Vitec J, Alarcon GS. Involvement of the cervical spine in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1989;32:652–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kauppi M, Hakala M. Prevalence of cervical spine subluxations and dislocations in a community-based rheumatoid arthritis population. Scand J Rheumatol 1994;23:133–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Collacott RA. Atlantoaxial instability in Down's syndrome. Br Med J 1987;294:988–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Santavirta S, Slätis P, Sandelin J, Konttinen YT. Atlantoaxial subluxation in patients with seronegative spondylarthritis. Rheumatol Int 1987;7:43–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Komusi T, Munro T, Harth M. Radiological review: the rheumatoid cervical spine. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1985;14:187–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weissman BNW, Aliabadi P, Weinfeld MS, Thomas WH, Sosman JL. Prognostic features of atlantoaxial subluxation in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Radiology 1982;144:745–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Winfield J, Cooke D, Brook AS, Corbett M. A prospective study of the radiological changes in the cervical spine in early rheumatoid disease. Ann Rheum Dis 1981;40:109–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kauppi M, Sakaguchi M, Konttinen YT, Hämäläinen M, Hakala M. Pathogenetic mechanism and prevalence of the stable atlantoaxial subluxation in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1996;23:831–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Oda T, Fujiwara K, Yonenobu K, Azuma B, Ochi T. Natural course of cervical spine lesions in rheumatoid arthritis. Spine 1995;20:1128–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kauppi M, Sakaguchi M, Konttinen YT, Hämäläinen M. A new method of screening for vertical atlantoaxial dislocation. J Rheumatol 1990;17:167–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kauppi M, Anttila P. A stiff cervical collar in the treatment of rheumatoid atlantoaxial subluxation. Br J Rheumatol 1996;35:771–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kauppi M, Leppänen L, Heikkilä S, Lahtinen T, Kautiainen H. Active conservative treatment of atlantoaxial subluxation in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1998;37:417–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. White RH. Preoperative evaluation of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1985;14:287–99.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bell GR, Stearns KL. Flexion-extension MRI of the upper rheumatoid cervical spine. Orthopedics 1991;9:969–74.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Roca A, Bernreuter WK, Alarcon GS. Functional magnetic resonance imaging should be included in the evaluation of the cervical spine in patients with RA. J Rheumatol 1993;20:1485–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kauppi M. The effect of flexion-extension movement on vertical atlantoaxial subluxation measurements. J Rheumatol 1991; 18:1804–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kauppi M. A method for classification of the posterior atlantoaxial subluxation. Clin Rheumatol 1994;13:492–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Rheumatology, FIN-18120, Finland

    M. Kauppi

  2. Department of Surgery, Rheumatism Foundation Hospital, Heinola

    M. H. Neva

  3. Department of Medicine, University of Oulu, Finland

    M. Kauppi

Authors
  1. M. Kauppi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. H. Neva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Kauppi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kauppi, M., Neva, M.H. Sensitivity of lateral view cervical spine radiographs taken in the neutral position in atlantoaxial subluxation in rheumatic diseases. Clin Rheumatol 17, 511–514 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01451289

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01451289

Keywords

Search

Navigation