Table 2.

Summary of primary and key secondary and exploratory efficacy results at week 16a.

OutcomePlacebo, n = 52, n/N (%)SEC, 300 mg, n = 103, n/N (%)OR
(95% CI)
PSEC 150 mg, n = 103, n/N (%)OR
(95% CI)
P
Primary efficacy variable
   ACR2012/52 (23.1)53/103 (51.5)3.51 (1.65-7.45)0.00138/103 (36.9)1.92 (0.89-4.15)0.10
Secondary binary efficacy variables
   ACR503/52 (5.8)29/103 (28.2)6.30 (1.81-21.88)0.00425/103 (24.3)4.77 (1.36-16.77)0.02
   ACR701/52 (1.9)18/103 (17.5)10.50 (1.36-81.30)0.0211/103 (10.7)5.42 (0.67-43.64)0.11
   Resolution of enthesitis, LEI + SPARCCb7/39 (17.9)28/74 (37.8)2.85 (1.08-7.50)0.0330/76 (39.5)2.65 (1.01-6.93)0.047
   Resolution of dactylitisc4/23 (17.4)20/49 (40.8)3.27 (0.96-11.20)0.0620/52 (38.5)3.40 (0.98-11.76)0.05
   PASI75d7/43 (16.3)51/79 (64.6)9.49 (3.73-24.16)< 0.00145/83 (54.2)6.38 (2.51-16.24)< 0.001
   PASI90d4/43 (9.3)39/79 (49.4)9.86 (3.19-30.45)< 0.00130/83 (36.1)5.21 (1.68-16.21)0.004
   PASI100d1/43 (2.3)20/79 (25.3)14.38 (1.86-111.53)0.0115/83 (18.1)9.82 (1.24-77.90)0.03
   MDA2/52 (3.8)27/103 (26.2)8.75 (1.99-38.45)0.00427/103 (26.2)8.34 (1.89-36.85)0.005
Placebo, LSM, n = 52SEC 300 mg, LSM, n = 103LSM of Treatment Difference, (SE)e [95% CI]PSEC 150 mg, LSM, n = 103LSM of Treatment Difference, (SE)e [95% CI]P
Secondary and exploratory continuous efficacy variablesf
   Change from baseline in DAS28-CRP-0.35-1.39-1.05 (0.203)
[-1.45 to -0.65]
< 0.001-1.18-0.83 (0.207)
[-1.24 to -0.43]
< 0.001
   Change from baseline in PASDAS-0.36-1.04-0.68 (0.085)
[-0.85 to -0.52]
< 0.001-0.92-0.57 (0.086)
[-0.74 to -0.40]
< 0.001
   Change from baseline in SF-12 MCS1.543.051.51 (1.334)
[-1.12 to 4.14]
0.261.770.23 (1.353)
[-2.43 to 2.90]
0.86
   Change from baseline in SF-12 PCS-0.634.825.45 (1.363)
[2.76 to 8.13]
< 0.0014.324.94 (1.385)
[2.22 to 7.67]
< 0.001
   Change from baseline in HAQ-DI-0.11-0.32-0.21 (0.081)
[-0.37 to -0.05]
0.01-0.24-0.13 (0.083)
[-0.30 to 0.03]
0.11
   Change from baseline in RAPID3-0.78-4.57-3.80 (0.941)
[-5.65 to -1.94]
< 0.001-3.67-2.89 (0.960)
[-4.78 to -1.00]
0.003
  • aORs, 95% CIs, and P values are based on logistic regression using nonresponder imputation.

  • bResults are from the combined LEI and SPARCC subset. Enthesitis was determined in patients who had an enthesitis score ≥ 1 when sites from LEI and SPARCC were assessed together at baseline: SEC 300 mg, n = 74; SEC 150 mg, n = 76; placebo, n = 39.

  • cDactylitis was determined in patients who had a Leeds Dactylitis Index ≥ 1 at baseline: SEC 300 mg, n = 49; SEC 150 mg, n = 52; placebo, n = 23.

  • dResults are from patients having psoriatic skin involvement in ≥ 3% of their body surface area at baseline: SEC 300 mg, n = 79; SEC 150 mg, n = 83; placebo, n = 43.

  • eLSM of the treatment difference vs placebo.

  • fLSM, LSM of treatment differences, 95% CI, and P values are based on an ANCOVA model; missing data were imputed using last observation carried forward.

  • ACR: American College of Rheumatology; DAS28-CRP: Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using C-reactive protein; HAQ-DI: Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; LEI: Leeds Enthesitis Index; LSM: least-squares mean; MCS: mental component summary score; MDA: minimal disease activity; OR: odds ratio; PASDAS: Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score; PASI: Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PCS: physical component summary score; RAPID3: Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3; SE: standard error; SEC: secukinumab; SF-12: 12-item Short Form Health Survey; SPARCC: Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Enthesitis Index.