Table 3.

Baseline model: baseline predictors of failure to apply T2T-LDA during 2-year followup of the RA BIODAM cohort.

VariablesUnivariable OR (95% CI), N = 544–571Univariable pMultivariable OR (95% CI), N = 549
Age, yrs1.01 (1.00–1.01)0.096¥
Sex, female1.01 (0.81–1.25)0.963
Disease duration, yrs1.00 (0.99–1.02)0.528
Education, yrs0.97 (0.95–1.00)0.032¥
No. comorbidities1.17 (1.08–1.26)< 0.0011.10 (1.02–1.19)
Current smoker1.24 (1.01–1.53)0.0411.32 (1.08–1.63)
Type of center, academic0.82 (0.67–1.00)0.0500.81 (0.66–0.99)
RF positivity0.63 (0.51–0.77)< 0.001£
ACPA positivity0.57 (0.47–0.70)< 0.001£
RF and/or ACPA positivity0.58 (0.46–0.73)< 0.0010.63 (0.50–0.80)
DAS44-ESR LDA1.06 (0.58–1.96)0.845
PtGA (0–10)1.07 (1.03–1.12)0.001¥
PGA (0–10)1.07 (1.02–1.13)0.009¥
Swollen joint count (0–44)1.01 (1.00–1.03)0.075¥
Tender joint count (0–53)1.03 (1.03–1.04)< 0.0011.03 (1.02–1.04)
ESR, mm/h1.00 (1.00–1.01)0.516
CRP, mg/l1.00 (0.99–1.00)0.908
HAQ1.29 (1.12–1.49)< 0.001¥
No. previous csDMARD1.02 (0.94–1.11)0.622
Previous treatment with any csDMARD1.10 (0.91–1.33)0.318
  • Not selected from the univariable analysis (p > 0.20).

  • ¥ Not significant in the multivariable analysis (p > 0.05).

  • £: RF or ACPA positivity entered into multivariate model. Country added as a covariate in all univariable models and in the final multivariable model. Final model also adjusted for type of treatment (csDMARD and/or bDMARD). Values in bold face are statistically significant. T2T: treat-to-target; LDA: low disease activity; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; RF: rheumatoid factor; ACPA: anticitrullinated protein antibody; DAS44-ESR: 44-joint count Disease Activity Score based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate; PtGA: patient’s global assessment; PGA: physician’s global assessment; CRP: C-reactive protein; HAQ: Health Assessment Questionnaire; csDMARD: conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; bDMARD: biological DMARD.