Table 2.

Comparative performance of CV risk scores against 3 quantitative measurements of coronary artery plaque.

Risk ScoresTotal Plaque VolumeSegment Involvement ScoreSegment Stenosis Scale
High RiskLow RiskpHigh RiskLow RiskpHigh RiskLow Riskp
FRS1.7 ± 2.6, n = 191.07 ± 1.5, n = 310.222.7 ± 2.2, n = 191.6 ± 1.8, n = 310.0505.1 ± 6.4, n = 193.2 ± 3.4, n = 310.39
m-FRS1.8 ± 2.4, n = 240.8 ± 1.5, n = 260.0092.9 ± 2.0, n = 241.2 ± 1.6, n = 260.0015.5 ± 5.8, n = 242.3 ± 3.0, n = 260.03
SCORE2.2 ± 2.9, n = 140.9 ± 1.4, n = 360.082.9 ± 2.2, n = 131.7 ± 1.8, n = 370.076.0 ± 7.1, n = 133.1 ± 3.5, n = 370.22
m-SCORE2.1 ± 2.6, n = 220.7 ± 1.07, n = 280.0033.1 ± 2.1, n = 221.2 ± 1.4, n = 28< 0.0015.8 ± 5.9, n = 222.3 ± 3.1, n = 280.01
QRISK21.4 ± 1.4, n = 121.3 ± 2.2, n = 380.303.0 ± 2.3, n = 121.7 ± 1.8, n = 380.066.6 ± 7.2, n = 123.0 ± 3.5, n = 380.09
m-QRISK21.5 ± 1.4, n = 221.2 ± 2.4, n = 280.042.7 ± 2.1, n = 221.5 ± 1.7, n = 280.015.3 ± 5.9, n = 222.8 ± 3.5, n = 280.06
ASCVD1.7 ± 2.5, n = 270.8 ± 1.0, n = 230.202.3 ± 2.0, n = 271.6 ± 1.9, n = 230.124.7 ± 5.7, n = 272.9 ± 3.5, n = 230.28
m-ASCVD1.6 ± 2.2, n = 360.4 ± 0.7, n = 140.0012.5 ± 2.1, n = 360.85 ± 1.0, n = 140.0074.7 ± 5.3, n = 361.7 ± 2.0, n = 140.04
  • Results are presented as mean ± SD. The standard cutoff values were used to define high risk of CV disease for the general population: FRS > 10%, QRISK2 > 20%, SCORE > 5%, and ASCVD > 7.5%. The EULAR recommended modifications (multiplication factor by 1.5) were also applied for 4 CV risk scores and labeled as m-FRS, m-SCORE, m-QRISK2, and m-ASCVD. CV: cardiovascular; FRS: Framingham risk score; SCORE: Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation; ASCVD: Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease score; EULAR: European League Against Rheumatism.