Study, Yr | Treatment | Tool Used to Measure Work Productivity | Range* | Measurement of Self-reported Work Productivity | Change in Self-reported Work Productivity | Measure of Variability for Self-reported Work Productivity | Absenteeism◊ | Presenteeism§ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kavanaugh, et al, 200610 | PBO | VAS | (0–10) | Median VAS score change from baseline | −0.3 | IQR (−1.5, 1.5) | 0 | NR |
IFX, 5 mg/kg | −2.6** | IQR (− 0.5, −5) | −9.3 | NR | ||||
Kavanaugh, et al, 200911 | PBO | VAS | (0–10) | Mean VAS score change from baseline | −0.08 | SD (2.6) | 0.4 | NR |
GOL, 50 mg | −1.9** | SD (2.7) | 1.6 | NR | ||||
GOL, 100 mg | −2.6** | SD (3) | 2.3 | NR | ||||
Kavanaugh, et al, 201212 | PBO | VAS | (0–10) | Mean VAS score change from baseline | −0.78 | NR | NR | NR |
UST, 45 mg | −1.82** | NR | NR | NR | ||||
UST, 90 mg | −2.64** | NR | NR | NR | ||||
Kavanaugh, et al, 201513 | PBO | WPS | (0–10) | Mean WPS score change from baseline | −1 | NR | −1 | −0.3 |
CZP, 200 mg | −2.7NR | NR | −1.8NR | −3.9** | ||||
CZP, 400 mg | −1.9 NR | NR | −1 | −3** | ||||
Zhang, et al, 201414 | PBO | WLQ | (0–10) Ŧ | Median % improvement of productivity loss | 0.37 | NR | NR | NR |
APR, 20 mg | −1.89NR | NR | NR | NR | ||||
APR, 30 mg | −2.47 NR | NR | NR | NR |
↵* Lower VAS, WPS, and WLQ scores represent greater work productivity.
↵** Statistically significant difference compared to PBO at a 0.05 level.
↵◊ Days missed from work per month.
↵§ Days with reduced productivity per month.
↵Ŧ Scores were transformed from a 0–100 scale. PBO: placebo; IFX: infliximab; GOL: golimumab; UST: ustekinumab; CZP: certolizumab pegol; APR: apremilast; VAS: visual analog scale; WPS: Work Productivity Survey; WLQ: Work Limitations Questionnaire; IQR: interquartile range;
↵NR: statistical significance level not reported; NR: not reported.