Table 3.

Cox regression analysis for TNFi discontinuation stratified by diagnosis. Values are HR (95% CI).

VariablesASPsA
UnivariateFinal Model after Backward SelectionUnivariateFinal Model after Backward Selection
Sex, male vs female0.66 (0.48–0.93)a0.73 (0.51–1.04)*0.64 (0.46–0.88)b0.62 (0.45–0.86)b
Age, per 10 yrs0.94 (0.74–1.32)0.91 (0.64–1.29)
Symptom duration, < vs ≥ 5 yrs1.40 (1.00–1.97)*0.90 (0.65–1.26)
TNFi agent used, ETN vs other2.17 (1.50–3.15)c1.77 (1.19–2.63)b
TNFi agent used
  IFX, ref1.00 (ref)
  ETN1.22 (0.81–1.83)
  ADA1.25 (0.75–2.06)
  GOL2.35 (1.12–4.91)a
Year of TNFi therapy start, per 2 yrs1.24 (1.11–1.38)c1.17 (1.04–1.31)a1.04 (0.92–1.18)
Previous csDMARD, yes vs no0.72 (0.53–0.99)a0.65 (0.47–0.90)b1.06 (0.65–1.74)
MTX co-therapy, yes vs no0.89 (0.62–1.30)0.65 (0.46–0.92)a0.61 (0.43–0.87)b
Axial disease, yes vs no0.91 (0.60–1.37)
Peripheral disease, yes vs no1.41 (1.02–1.94)a1.53 (1.11–2.10)b1.98 (0.82–4.76)**2.20 (0.90–5.34)*
CRP, > vs ≤ 1.2 mg/dl0.83 (0.58–1.19)0.74 (0.49–1.11)**
VAS global, > vs ≤ 601.15 (0.82–1.63)1.09 (0.76–1.56)
PGA, > vs ≤ 21.07 (0.73–1.58)1.06 (0.71–1.58)
BASDAI, > vs ≤ 51.07 (0.74–1.53)
BASFI, > vs ≤ 51.27 (0.84–1.94)
SJC-28, > vs ≤ 21.05 (0.72–1.52)
TJC-28, > vs ≤ 31.24 (0.84–1.84)
DAS28-ESR baseline, > vs ≤ 4.51.06 (0.70–1.62)
  • * p < 0.1.

  • **: p < 0.2.

  • a p < 0.05.

  • b p < 0.01.

  • c p < 0.001. TNFi: tumor necrosis factor inhibitor; AS: ankylosing spondylitis; PsA: psoriatic arthritis; IFX: infliximab; ETN: etanercept; ADA: adalimumab; GOL: golimumab; csDMARD: conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; MTX: methotrexate; CRP: C-reactive protein; VAS: visual analog scale; PGA: physician’s global assessment; BASDAI: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score; BASFI: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index; SJC-28: swollen joint count in 28 joints; TJC-28: tender joint count in 28 joints; DAS28-ESR: 28-joint Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using erythrocyte sedimentation rate.