Table 3.

Univariate sensitivity analysis.

VariablesSensitivity Analysis, RangeICER, Range
AnnualBiannual
HRQOL weights
  00.695–0.7657546–17,8139469–22,350
  10.685–0.7557737–13,6789708–17,162
  20.685–0.7559118–16,67811,441–17,162
  30.633–0.7079947–25,44912,481–31,928
  40.602–0.67812,809–16,43716,071–20,624
Probabilities of gout flares/yr
  Nonadherent to therapy
    00.33–0.429283–17,54112,428–21,324
    10.2–0.313,184–14,13716,619–17,666
    20.22–0.3211,312–16,22314,841–19,659
    30.06–0.128334–23,38311,116–28,141
    40–0.046199–17,9338673–21,991
  Adherent to therapy
    00.46–0.5611,112–16,83014,430–20,519
    10.23–0.3312,339–14,98115,694–18,591
    20.14–0.249371–17,87112,726–21,481
    30–0.079149–24,44612,059–29,294
    40–0.0413,678–34,25817,162–40,451
Effectiveness of urate monitoring in improving adherence, %≥ 40 (equivalent to no monitoring)Annual monitoring cost effective at adherence rate > 41.6Biannual monitoring cost effective > adherence rate of 43.4
Rates of flare treatment, %
  Hospital1–1213,678–30,72814,162–34,212
  Home0–2011,024 to dominant14,508 to dominant
Patients taking febuxostat vs allopurinol, %0–1013,461–24,29516,945–27,778
  • ICER: incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; HRQOL: health-related quality of life.