Table 5.

Studies examining the relationship between body composition and patellar cartilage.

StudyOutcome(s) AssessedOA/non-OAVariables Adjusted ForResults (95% CI or p value)Conclusion
Fat mass
Patellar cartilage defects
Cross-sectional studies: association between fat mass and patellar cartilage defects
Teichtahl, et al27Presence of patellar cartilage defectsNon-OAAge, patellar cartilage volume, and fat-free massMen, increased odds of defects, OR 1.11 (95% CI 1.01–1.23), p = 0.04; women, no increased odds of defects, OR 1.06 (95% CI 0.99–1.13), p = 0.09Higher fat mass was significantly associated with patellar cartilage defects for men only
Longitudinal studies: association between change in fat mass over previous period and patellar cartilage defects
Teichtahl, et al27Presence of patellar cartilage defectsNon-OAAge, patellar cartilage volume, and fat-free massMen, no increased odds of defects, OR 1.03 (95% CI 0.89–1.18), p = 0.71; women, no increased odds of defects, OR 1.10 (95% CI 0.99–1.21), p = 0.08No significant association between change in fat mass over the previous 10 yrs and patellar cartilage defects
Patellar cartilage volume
Cross-sectional studies: association between fat mass and patellar cartilage volume
Teichtahl, et al27Patellar cartilage volumeNon-OAAge and fat-free massMen, patellar cartilage volume, regression coefficient: −14.8 (95% CI −50.2 to 20.7), p = 0.41; women, patellar cartilage volume, regression coefficient: 2.2 (95% CI −15.4 to 19.8), p = 0.80No significant association between fat mass and patellar cartilage volume
Longitudinal studies: association between change in fat mass over previous period and current patellar cartilage volume
Teichtahl, et al27Patellar cartilage volumeNon-OAAge and fat-free massMen, relationship between change in fat mass and current patellar cartilage volume, regression coefficient: −15.3 (95% CI −50.9 to 20.3), p = 0.40; women, relationship between change in fat mass and current patellar cartilage volume, regression coefficient: 2.3 (95% CI −15.7 to 20.3), p = 0.80No significant association between change in fat mass over the previous 10 yrs and patellar cartilage volume
Longitudinal studies: association between baseline fat mass and change in patellar cartilage volume
Teichtahl, et al35Annual change in patellar cartilage volumeNon-OAAge, gender, baseline patella bone, and participation in physical activityMen, association with annual loss of patellar cartilage volume, regression coefficient: 1.8 (95% CI −0.8 to 4.4), p = 0.17; women, association with annual loss of patellar cartilage volume, regression coefficient: 1.8 (95% CI 0.2–3.4), p = 0.03Higher fat mass was significantly associated with increased loss of patellar cartilage volume for women only
Longitudinal studies: association between change in fat mass and change in patellar cartilage volume
Teichtahl, et al35Annual change in patellar cartilage volumeNon-OAAge, baseline patella bone and cartilage volume, and physical activityData not shownNo significant association between change in fat mass and change in knee cartilage
Fat-free mass
Patellar cartilage defects
Cross-sectional studies: association between fat-free mass and patellar cartilage defects
Teichtahl, et al27Presence of patellar cartilage defectsNon-OAAge, patellar cartilage volume, and fat massMen, increased odds of defects, OR 1.07 (95% CI 0.94–1.21), p = 0.34; significantly women, increased odds of defects, OR 1.19 (95% CI 1.03–1.38), p = 0.02Higher fat-free mass was associated with patellar cartilage defects for women only
Longitudinal studies: association between change in fat-free mass over previous period and patellar cartilage defects
Teichtahl, et al27Presence of patellar cartilage defectsNon-OAAge, patellar cartilage volume, and fat massMen, increased odds of defects, OR 1.21 (95% CI 1.01–1.45), p = 0.04; women, increased odds of defects OR 1.34 (95% CI 1.11–1.63), p = 0.003Greater increase in fat-free mass was significantly associated with patellar cartilage defects
Patellar cartilage volume
Cross-sectional studies: association between fat-free mass and patellar cartilage volume
Teichtahl, et al27Patellar cartilage volumeNon-OAAge, fat massMen, patellar cartilage volume, regression coefficient: 16.5 (95% CI −32.2 to 65.3), p = 0.50; women, patellar cartilage volume, regression coefficient: 0.1 (95% CI −40.2 to 40.3), p = 0.99No significant association between fat-free mass and patellar cartilage volume
Longitudinal studies: association between change in fat-free mass over previous period and current patellar cartilage volume
Teichtahl, et al27Patellar cartilage volumeNon-OAAge, fat massMen, relationship between change in fat-free mass and current patellar cartilage volume, regression coefficient: 17.4 (95% CI −31.5 to 66.3), p = 0.48; women, relationship between change in fat-free mass and current patellar cartilage volume, regression coefficient: −1.0 (95% CI −42.1 to 40.2), p = 0.96No significant association between fat-free mass and patellar cartilage volume
  • OA: osteoarthritis.