Table 1.

Methods of calculation, anchor characteristics, and scaling of MCID calculation in included articles (n = 36).

Total, n = 36RA, n = 17OA Knee and Hip, n = 4OA Knee, n = 12OA Hip, n = 5OA Hand, n = 1
Calculation method
  Distribution only1 (2.8%)1 (6%)
  Anchor only16 (44.4%)7 (41%)3 (75%)3 (25%)3 (60%)1 (100%)
  Distribution and anchor19 (52.8%)9 (53%)1 (25%)9 (75%)2 (40%)
Articles with anchor
  External patient anchor27 (75%)8 (47%)4 (100%)12 (100%)5 (100%)1 (100%)
  Other internal anchors (non-patient derived)8 (22.2%)8 (47%)
External patient anchor properties
  No. of level of response (range)3 to 153 to 75 to 153 to 153 to 58
  Time frame of anchor (range)2 wks to 5 yrs2 wks to 1 yr2 wks to 3 mos4 wks to 5 yrs4 wks to 1 yr2 wks to 4 wks
  Multiple recall points5 (13.9%)1 (6%)3 (25%)1 (100%)
Scaling
  Ordinal35 (97.2%)16 (94%)4 (100%)12 (100%)5 (100%)1 (100%)
  Interval1 (2.8%)1 (6%)
PROM
  WOMAC11 (31%)2 (50%)7 (58%)4 (80%)
  SF3610 (28%)5 (29%)1 (25%)4 (33%)1 (20%)
  FACIT3 (8%)3 (18%)
  HAQ8 (22%)8 (47%)
  Others20 (56%)12 (71%)2 (50%)7 (58%)2 (40%)1 (100%)
  • 2 of 8 were group conversations. n: number of articles; PROM: patient-reported outcome measures; WOMAC: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index; SF-36: Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36; FACIT-F: Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue; HAQ: Health Assessment Questionnaire.