Table 5.

Metric properties of instruments measuring pain, physical function or patient global assessment – validity.* Correlations between different instruments as observed in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies are shown.

InstrumentsStudiesCorrelation with:
Cross-sectional studies
  Questionnaires
    AIMS-2MacIntyre and Wessel32
  • Dexterity small/large objects: r range per item 0.23–0.40/0.14–0.31#

  • Grip strength: r range per item −0.23 to −0.37#

Moe, et al34AIMS-2 physical/arm/hand:
  • AUSCAN function: r 0.83/0.70/0.77

  • FIHOA: r 0.80/0.71/0.69

Stamm, et al41
  • JTHFT: r 0.67

    AUSCAN functionAllen, et al24
  • Grip strength right, left: r −0.42, −0.40

  • Pinch strength right, left: r −0.23, −0.16

Bellamy, et al25Likert, VAS:
  • Global function, 0–4: r 0.72, 0.74**

  • FIHOA, original: r 0.78, 0.86**

  • HAQ: r 0.65, 0.68**

  • Grip strength: r −0.39, −0.45**

  • Pinch grip: r −0.31, −0.36**

Dziedzic, et al27
  • GAT: r 0.54**

  • Grip strength: r −0.56**

  • Pinch strength: r −0.60**

Fernandes, et al28
  • MAP-hand: r 0.76#

Moe, et al34
  • AIMS-2 physical: r 0.83, arm: r 0.70, hand: r 0.77

  • FIHOA: r 0.88

  • HAQ: r 0.80

  • Grip strength: r −0.62

  • MPUT right, left: r 0.58, 0.63

Sautner, et al40
  • VAS global: r 0.55

Stamm, et al41
  • JTHFT: r 0.386

Wittoek, et al43
  • FIHOA: r 0.81

    AUSCAN painAllen, et al24
  • Pain severity right, left: r 0.58, 0.55

Bellamy, et al25Likert, VAS:
  • Global pain, 0–4: r 0.57, 0.64**

  • HAQ pain: r 0.57, 0.66**

  • Doyle: r 0.56, 0.47**

Bijsterbosch, et al19
  • Doyle hand, total: r 0.65, 0.61

Moe, et al34
  • VAS pain: r 0.77

Wittoek, et al43
  • VAS pain: r 0.79

    Cochin scalePoiraudeau, et al36
  • FIHOA: r 0.87#

  • Revel functional index: r 0.86

  • VAS handicap: r 0.67

Poole, et al37
  • FIHOA: r 0.89**

  • MHQ: r −0.82**

  • AHFT: r range per item −0.64 to 0.57**

  • HFI: r 0.55, HAMIS: r 0.49**

Stamm, et al41
  • JTHFT: r 0.369**

    FIHOABellamy, et al25Original/Likert/VAS:
  • AUSCAN function (Likert, VAS): r 0.78, 0.86/0.80, 0.85/0.80, 0.88**

Moe, et al34
  • AIMS-2 physical/arm/hand: r 0.80/0.71/0.69

  • AUSCAN function: r 0.88

  • HAQ: r 0.73

  • Grip strength: r −0.5

  • MPUT right/left: r 0.55/0.59

Poiraudeau, et al36
  • Cochin scale: r 0.87#

Poole, et al37
  • Cochin: r 0.89**

  • MHQ: r −0.86**

  • AHFT: r range per item −0.57 to 0.46**

  • HFI: r 0.53, HAMIS: r 0.50**

Stamm, et al41
  • JTHFT: r 0.387

Wittoek, et al43
  • AUSCAN function: r 0.81

    HAQBellamy, et al25
  • AUSCAN function (Likert, VAS): r 0.65, 0.68**

Fernandes, et al28Modified HAQ with MAP-hand: r 0.46#
Moe, et al34
  • AUSCAN function: r 0.80

  • FIHOA: r 0.73

Stamm, et al41
  • JTHFT: r 0.424

    SACRAHRintelen, et al38Short-form SACRAH with modified SACRAH: r 0.699
Sautner, et al39Modified SACRAH:
  • SACRAH: r 0.978 (range subscales 0.912–0.958)

  • VAS global: r 0.64

Sautner, et al40Modified SACRAH function/total with VAS global: r 0.55/0.65
Stamm, et al41SACRAH/M-SACRAH:
  • JTHFT: r 0.436 (range per scale 0.371–0.437)/0.388

    VAS globalSautner, et al39
  • Modified SACRAH: r 0.64

Sautner, et al40
  • Function AUSCAN/modified SACRAH: r 0.55/0.55

  • Pain AUSCAN/modified SACRAH: r 0.59/0.56

  • Total modified SACRAH: r 0.65

    VAS painMoe, et al34
  • AUSCAN pain: r 0.77

Wittoek, et al43
  • AUSCAN pain: r 0.79

  Performance- or assessor-based instruments
    AHFTBackman and Mackie18
  • OMFAQ instrumental ADL scale: range per item r −0.75 to 0.75

  • OMFAQ physical ADL scale: range per item r −0.67 to 0.68

Poole, et al37
  • Cochin scale: r range per item −0.64 to 0.57**

  • FIHOA: r range per item −0.57 to 0.46**

  • MHQ: r range per item −0.48 to 0.65**

    DexterityMacIntyre and Wessel32Large/small objects:
  • AIMS-2: r range per item 0.14–0.31/0.23–0.40#

MacIntyre, et al33Large/small objects:
  • Grip strength: r −0.32 (range digits −0.25 to −0.30)/ −0.28 (−0.10 to −0.41)#

  • Pinch (tripod, narrow, wide key): r −0.37, −0.30, −0.34/−0.34, −0.25, −0.25#

    GATDziedzic, et al27
  • AUSCAN function: r 0.54**

Fernandes, et al28
  • MAP-hand: r 0.43#

    Grip strengthAllen, et al24
  • AUSCAN function (right, left): r −0.42, −0.40

Bellamy, et al25
  • AUSCAN function (Likert, VAS): r −0.39, −0.45**

Dziedzic, et al27
  • AUSCAN function: r −0.56**

Fernandes, et al28
  • MAP-hand: r −0.32#

MacIntyre and Wessel32
  • AIMS-2: r range per item −0.23 to −0.37#

MacIntyre, et al33
  • PRWHE activities: r −0.23#

  • Dexterity large: r −0.32, small: −0.28#

  • Pinch strength (range per test): r 0.76–0.78#

Moe, et al34
  • AUSCAN function: r −0.62

  • FIHOA: r −0.50

Stamm, et al41
  • JTHFT: r −0.395

    MPUTMoe, et al34
  • AUSCAN function (right, left): r 0.58, 0.63

  • FIHOA (right, left): r 0.55, 0.59

Stamm, et al41
  • JTHFT: r 0.690

    Pinch strengthAllen, et al24
  • AUSCAN function (right, left): r −0.23, −0.16

Bellamy, et al25
  • AUSCAN function (Likert, VAS): r −0.31, −0.36**

Dziedzic, et al27
  • AUSCAN function: r −0.60**

MacIntyre, et al33
  • PRWHE activities (range per test): r −0.22 to −0.26#

  • Dexterity (range per test) large: r −0.30 to −0.37, small: r −0.25 to −0.34#

  • Grip strength (range per test): r 0.75–0.96#

    Tenderness/pain on palpationBellamy, et al25
  • Doyle with AUSCAN (Likert, VAS) pain: r 0.56, 0.47**

Bijsterbosch, et al19
  • Doyle hand/total with AUSCAN pain: r 0.65/0.61

Longitudinal studies
  Questionnaires
    AUSCAN totalAllen, et al23
  • Association global assessment of change (right, left) with AUSCAN total: β 0.29, 0.27 (p < 0.001). Stronger among greater radiographic OA severity.

    AUSCAN functionFernandes, et al28
  • Change MAP-hand: r 0.52#

    AUSCAN painBarthel, et al46
  • Change VAS pain: r 0.81

    VAS globalBarthel, et al46
  • Change AUSCAN function: r 0.71, pain: r 0.75

  • Change VAS pain: r 0.76

    VAS painBarthel, et al46
  • Change AUSCAN pain: r 0.81

Performance- or assessor-based instruments
    GATFernandes, et al28
  • Change MAP-hand: r 0.06#

    Grip strengthAllen, et al23
  • Global assessment of change (right, left): β −0.16, −0.13 (p 0.003, 0.015).


Stronger associations among greater radiographic OA severity.
Fernandes, et al28
  • Change MAP-hand: r −0.05#

    Pinch strengthAllen, et al23
  • Global assessment of change (right, left): β −0.13, −0.11 (p 0.022, 0.060).


Stronger associations among greater radiographic OA severity.
  • * Only instruments assessed in ≥ 2 studies were included in this table.

  • # No p values provided.

  • ** p value < 0.05.

  • p value < 0.001.

  • p value < 0.0001. AIMS-2: Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale-2; OA: osteoarthritis; AUSCAN: Australian/Canadian Hand OA Index; FIHOA: Functional Index for Hand OA; HAQ: Health Assessment Questionnaire; SACRAH: Score for Assessment and Quantification of Chronic Rheumatoid Affections of the Hands; VAS: visual analog scale; AHFT: Arthritis Hand Function Test; GAT: grip ability test; MPUT: Moberg Pick-Up Test; JTHFT: Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test; MAP-hand: Measure of Activity Performance; MHQ: Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire; HFI: hand functional index; OMFAQ: Older Americans’ Resources and Services Multidimensional Functional Assessment Questionnaire; PRWHE: Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation; HAMIS: Hand Mobility in Scleroderma Test.