Table 1.

Comparison between the clinical and serological features of patients who did and did not return to IV administration of ABA after the switch to SC administration. Values are n (%) unless otherwise specified. None of the p values were significant.

Analyzed FeaturesPatients Who Maintained the SC Formulation, n = 37 (72.5%)Patients Who Returned to IV Infusions, n = 14 (27.5%)
Mean age, yrs (SD)59.6 (14.2)53.8 (11.3)
Positivity for RF34/37 (91.9)*12/13 (92.3)*
Positivity for ACPA21/29 (72.4)*10/13 (76.9)*
Mean disease duration, mos (SD)136.3 (116.5)132.8 (95.4)
Previous IV therapy duration, mos (SD)21.4 (18.5)16.6 (17.4)
BMI, mean (SD)24.6 (4.7)25.8 (5.1)
Smokers4 (10.8)3 (21.4)
DMARD in association33 (89.2)10 (71.4)
Previous use of biological agents25 (65.8)8 (72.7)
No. different biological agents used in the past, mean (SD)1.6 (1.6)1.9 (2.2)
ABA as first biological agent12 (32.4)4 (28.6)
Remission of the disease at SC therapy start, DAS28 < 2.629 (78.4)8 (57.1)
DAS28 at SC therapy start, mean (SD)2 (0.96)2.19 (0.98)
  • * Percentage based on available data. IV: intravenous; ABA: abatacept; SC: subcutaneous; RF: rheumatoid factor; ACPA: anticitrullinated protein antibodies; BMI: body mass index; DMARD: disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; DAS28: Disease Activity Score at 28 joints.