Table 2.

Test-retest reliability of candidate measures of at-work limitations/productivity (presenteeism).

InstrumentContent Sourcen (stable)*Mean Baseline Score (SD)Mean 2-wk Followup Score (SD)ICC2,1
Global measures
WPS-RA (item 4)$Item 4 from the Rheumatoid Arthritis-Specific Work Productivity Survey353.7 (3.0)3.7 (3.4)0.87
WPAI (item 5)$Item 5 from the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (specific health problem version)343.9 (3.0)3.4 (2.9)0.84
QQ method$Multiplication of 2 items (E1 and E2) from the Productivity and Disease Questionnaire (ProDISQ)3361.2 (33.3)57.6 (34.2)0.77
HPQ (item A12)$Item A12 from the Health and Work Performance Questionnaire367.1 (2.0)7.4 (2.1)0.83
WAI (item 1)Item 1 from the Work Ability Index67.5 (2.1)6.7 (2.5)0.80
Multi-item measures
WALSWorkplace Activity Limitations Scale (12 items)3712.5 (7.3)12.2 (8.0)0.93
WLQ-25 (adapted)$Work Limitations Questionnaire-25 (4 subscales: TM: time management [5 items], PD: physical demands [6 items], MI: mental interpersonal [9 items], OD: output demands [5 items]); index score: weighted sum of subscales37TM = 36.5 (28.2);TM = 34.2 (26.5);TM = 0.93;
37PD = 47.1 (32.9);PD = 42.6 (32.9);PD = 0.95;
37MI = 25.6 (23.4);MI = 27.0 (24.6);MI = 0.79;
34OD = 34.4 (28.9);OD = 32.5 (31.6);OD = 0.86;
34Index = 9.6 (7.6)Index = 9.3 (7.8)Index = 0.93
  • * No change on an external anchor fielded at 2-wk followup (compared to when you completed the first questionnaire package, how would you rate your ability to do your usually work activities? 0 = much worse, 5 = no change, 10 = much better);

  • WLQ-25 was modified in this study — instruction for the physical demands subscale was reoriented to be consistent with other subscales;

  • low sample size because measure was introduced later in the survey.

  • $ instrument has potential for use in economic evaluations. ICC: intraclass correlation coefficients.