Table 4.

Additional outcomes comparing the IA-BoNT/A and IA-placebo groups using generalized estimating equations (GEE) analyses. Data are mean (SD).

Baseline Preinjection2 Weeks1 Month2 Months3 Months4 Monthsp (repeated measures analyses*)
Mean VAS pain (0–10)0.09
    IA-BoNT/A7.2 (1.1)NANA4.4 (2.5)4.2 (2.6)4.8 (2.4)
    IA-placebo7.5 (1.3)NANA5.7 (2.9)5.2 (3.2)5.0 (2.6)
Secondary outcomes
  WOMAC physical function (0–100)
    IA-BoNT/A56.5 (8.9)48.3 (13.1)47.8 (14.7)48.5 (14.4)46.8 (16.6)45.9 (17.9)0.03
    IA-placebo63.3 (17.5)60.9 (16.0)57.7 (18.8)59.7 (17.4)52.9 (21.1)57.1 (17.4)
  WOMAC stiffness (0–100)
    IA-BoNT/A64.1 (20.4)44.3 (24.9)49.4 (20.9)51.8 (19.1)50.0 (19.7)47.4 (25.5)< 0.01
    IA-placebo64.4 (18.9)63.7 (18.1)48.9 (26.1)60.4 (16.3)57.7 (23.5)59.9 (22.7)
  WOMAC pain (0–100)
    IA-BoNT/A58.0 (13.6)40.0 (16.9)49.5 (18.1)45.2 (22.3)43.6 (20.1)42.6 (20.1)0.12
    IA-placebo67.1 (15.3)54.7 (19.7)57.0 (17.6)58.3 (14.7)51.2 (22.7)51.6 (20.9)
  WOMAC total (0–100)
    IA-BoNT/A63.2 (9.3)50.9 (15.2)53.1 (16.2)52.9 (15.5)51.0 (17.8)49.9 (18.3)0.02
    IA-placebo70.6 (16.8)65.9 (17.7)62.5 (19.1)65.5 (17.0)58.3 (22.3)61.8 (18.9)
  Timed Stands Test
    IA-BoNT/A49.9 (31.4)NANA37.4 (15.8)35.5 (13.9)37.6 (15.7)0.98
    IA-placebo50.8 (29.3)NANA42.1 (22.5)39.3 (22.1)38.9 (13.0)
  Timed Up and Go Test
    IA-BoNT/A18.3 (13.8)NANA17.2 (9.6)17.6 (13.2)14.8 (5.9)0.14
    IA-placebo18.5 (12.7)NANA18.2 (13.8)15.5 (10.5)18.2 (16.3)
  Active flexion
    IA-BoNT/A83.3 (22.5)NANA75.0 (20.8)74.7 (23.0)79.3 (23.0)0.23
    IA-placebo86.2 (16.7)NANA87.5 (15.3)85.6 (12.5)83.1 (15.4)
  Active extension
    IA-BoNT/A170.7 (10.9)NANA170.0 (18.0)169.7 (13.1)157.8 (44.4)0.86
    IA-placebo167.8 (10.0)NANA170.5 (7.4)163.2 (40.2)163.7 (38.0)
  McGill affective dimension
    IA-BoNT/A6.1 (2.8)NA4.5 (3.1)3.8 (3.1)3.6 (3.1)3.9 (3.1)0.08
    IA-placebo5.3 (3.1)NA4.1 (3.5)4.8 (3.4)4.8 (3.5)4.8 (3.3)
  McGill sensory dimension
    IA-BoNT/A16.7 (6.5)NA14.5 (8.3)14.5 (8.0)11.6 (6.3)12.9 (8.1)0.73
    IA-placebo17.3 (6.8)NA13.4 (5.8)14.6 (7.5)11.7 (7.3)13.5 (8.4)
  McGill total
    IA-BoNT/A23.8 (8.3)NA19.0 (10.8)18.3 (10.1)15.4 (8.1)16.8 (10.8)0.42
    IA-placebo22.7 (8.8)NA17.5 (8.4)19.4 (10.3)16.7 (9.8)18.3 (11.2)
SF-36 subscales
  Bodily pain††
    IA-BoNT/A28.5 (17.0)NANA46.5 (19.0)42.9 (20.1)43.9 (22.7)0.049
    IA-placebo29.0 (13.7)NANA36.4 (17.4)37.0 (23.3)39.1 (24.5)
  Physical functioning
    IA-BoNT/A29.4 (21.3)NANA30.7 (21.8)29.3 (15.1)30.5 (19.6)0.68
    IA-placebo20.6 (16.0)NANA23.6 (17.5)25.2 (20.0)22.6 (18.8)
  Role physical
    IA-BoNT/A12.0 (21.1)NANA22.7 (29.8)26.1 (34.0)26.3 (30.9)0.74
    IA-placebo13.5 (23.7)NANA18.0 (26.5)28.1 (32.4)29.8 (35.0)
  Role emotional
    IA-BoNT/A49.3 (47.0)NANA45.4 (40.6)56.1 (47.6)46.7 (43.8)0.08
    IA-placebo48.7 (49.2)NANA61.3 (45.8)68.1 (42.3)63.5 (43.3)
  Mental health
    IA-BoNT/A69.6 (17.1)NANA67.8 (21.4)68.6 (17.8)68.6 (20.9)0.31
    IA-placebo64.0 (20.3)NANA67.5 (21.7)70.7 (26.1)69.5 (20.1)
  Social functioning
    IA-BoNT/A55.4 (26.1)NANA64.8 (26.3)60.2 (26.9)60.6 (25.1)0.99
    IA-placebo50.5 (29.3)NANA61.5 (27.7)62.0 (31.8)58.9 (37.3)
  General health
    IA-BoNT/A52.9 (20.7)NANA55.0 (20.4)49.3 (20.4)49.5 (24.4)0.98
    IA-placebo55.1 (24.4)NANA51.8 (21.7)52.1 (21.6)53.2 (21.7)
  Vitality
    IA-BoNT/A42.6 (17.8)NANA41.6 (19.5)46.4 (15.6)45.0 (23.5)0.98
    IA-placebo40.0 (24.6)NANA41.2 (24.3)44.4 (28.9)43.6 (27.9)
  • * Comparison of IA-BoNT/A and placebo for all efficacy timepoints up to 4 months using GEE, adjusting for respective baseline scores.

  • Sensitivity analyses that included bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) did not change the significance for any variable listed above (data not shown), except SF-36 pain, for which p value was 0.14 when all 60 TKA were included.

  • †† Only the SF-36 bodily pain subscale score was significantly different between groups; no other SF-36 subscale scores were significantly different between groups at 2 months. WOMAC: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index; SF-36: Short-form 36; NA: not applicable since these variables were not assessed at these telephone followup visits.