RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The comprehensive osteoarthritis test: a simple index for measurement of treatment effects in clinical trials.
JF The Journal of Rheumatology
JO J Rheumatol
FD The Journal of Rheumatology
SP 1180
OP 1186
VO 31
IS 6
A1 Lyndon O Brooks
A1 Margaret I Rolfe
A1 Phillip A Cheras
A1 Stephen P Myers
YR 2004
UL http://www.jrheum.org/content/31/6/1180.abstract
AB OBJECTIVE: To assess the measurement properties of a simple index of symptom severity in osteoarthritis (OA) of the hips and knees. METHODS: Both the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the proposed new Comprehensive Osteoarthritis Test (COAT) instrument were completed weekly by 125 subjects in the context of a randomized, 12-week, 3 parallel-arm clinical trial. The reliabilities of the various scales were assessed on a weekly basis by use of Cronbach's alpha coefficients. The validity of the COAT total scale was assessed by correlation with the WOMAC total scale on a weekly basis with correlation coefficients, and in terms of the correlations between subject-level intercepts and slopes over time. The relative responsiveness of the WOMAC and COAT total scales was assessed using a multilevel (longitudinal) multivariate (WOMAC, COAT) linear model. RESULTS: The WOMAC and COAT total scales were highly reliable (mean over weeks: WOMAC alpha = 0.98; COAT alpha = 0.97). The correlations between the WOMAC and COAT scales were very high (mean over weeks = 0.92; subject-level intercepts = 0.91, slopes = 0.88). The COAT total scale was significantly more responsive than the WOMAC total scale in the active treatment (34.8% improvement vs 26.8%; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The COAT total scale is simple to administer, reliable, valid, and responsive to treatment effects.