RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Patterns of disease modifying antirheumatic drug use in a Spanish cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
JF The Journal of Rheumatology
JO J Rheumatol
FD The Journal of Rheumatology
SP 697
OP 704
VO 30
IS 4
A1 Isidoro Gonzalez-Alvaro
A1 Loreto Carmona
A1 Alejandro Balsa
A1 Raimon Sanmarti
A1 Miguel A Belmonte
A1 Xavier Tena
A1 EMECAR Study Group
YR 2003
UL http://www.jrheum.org/content/30/4/697.abstract
AB OBJECTIVE: To determine the adequacy of disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) prescription to disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to assess whether the reasons for DMARD discontinuation agree with published evidence. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of the baseline year of a RA cohort (n = 788) randomly selected from the clinical registries of 34 centers. Data about current and previous DMARD use was collected from medical records and confirmed by the patient. Disease activity score (DAS), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and Larsen scores, and other clinical data were obtained during the study visit. RESULTS: At baseline visit, 607 patients (77%) were receiving one or more DMARD. Mean DAS, HAQ, and Larsen scores (+/- SD) were: 3.40 +/- 1.22, 1.6 +/- 0.4, and 54.68 +/- 26.37, respectively. Methotrexate (MTX) was the most frequently prescribed DMARD and parenteral gold salts (GS) showed the highest rate of discontinuation. MTX was used as single therapy in a significantly higher proportion (64.3%) than other DMARD (< 50%) and treatment discontinuation due to inefficacy was significantly less frequent (25.5%) than with other DMARD (> 40%). However, the DAS28 was significantly worse in the group treated with MTX in single therapy than in the group treated with GS alone (4.13 vs 3.43; p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: Despite the high use of DMARD among Spanish patients with RA, a significant number of them still have poor control of the disease. In addition, our data show a different perception of ineffectiveness depending on the DMARD used. A non-systematic use of objective quantitative tools for assessment of RA activity and some non-evidence based decisions on the management of DMARD may account for these findings.