PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Helliwell, Philip S. AU - Tillett, William AU - Waxman, Robin AU - Coates, Laura C. AU - Brooke, Mel AU - FitzGerald, Oliver AU - Packham, Jonathan C. AU - McHugh, Neil TI - Evaluation and validation of a patient completed psoriatic arthritis flare questionnaire AID - 10.3899/jrheum.201317 DP - 2021 Feb 15 TA - The Journal of Rheumatology PG - jrheum.201317 4099 - http://www.jrheum.org/content/early/2021/02/10/jrheum.201317.short 4100 - http://www.jrheum.org/content/early/2021/02/10/jrheum.201317.full AB - Objective Evaluation of a psoriatic arthritis (PsA), multidimensional, patient completed disease flare questionnaire (FLARE). Methods The FLARE questionnaire was administered to 139 patients in a prospective observational study. The ‘gold standard’ of flare was based on patient opinion. Test-retest was evaluated by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Disease activity was measured by the PASDAS, GRACE, CPDAI and DAPSA. Results The most common symptoms of a PsA flare were musculoskeletal, followed by fatigue, frustration, loss of function and an increase in cutaneous symptoms. The test-retest ICC for the FLARE questionnaire was 0.87 (95% CI 0.72 – 0.94). The optimum cut-off to identify a flare of disease was 4/10 (sensitivity 0.82, specificity 0.76; area under curve 0.85). For those patients scoring 4 or above, the mean score for the composite measures was as follows (score for those not reporting a flare in brackets): PASDAS, 5.3 ± 1.3 (3.1 ± 1.6); GRACE, 4.5 ± 1.2 (2.2 ± 1.4); CPDAI, 8.9 ± 2.5 (4.7 ± 3.1); DAPSA, 38.2 ± 20.3 (16.8 ± 14.9). In a new flare the increase in composite measure score was calculated as follows; 1 for PASDAS and GRACE, 2 for CPDAI, 7 for DAPSA. Moderate agreement was found between the definition of flare using the cut-off of 4, indicated by subjects in a separate question. Conclusion A PsA flare displays escalation of symptoms and signs across multiple domains; the FLARE questionnaire has external validity both in terms of composite disease activity and overall patient opinion of the state of their condition.