PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Matthew L. Thomas AU - Gavin Shaddick AU - Rachel Charlton AU - Charlotte Cavill AU - Richard Holland AU - Florenzo Iannone AU - Giovanni Lapadula AU - Simona Lopriore AU - Jakub Závada AU - Michal Uher AU - Karel Pavelka AU - Lenka Szczukova AU - Prodromos Sidiropolous AU - Irini Flouri AU - Alexandros Drosos AU - Burkhard Möller AU - Michael J Nissen AU - Rüdiger B Müller AU - Almut Scherer AU - Neil McHugh AU - Alison Nightingale TI - Tumour Necrosis Factor Inhibitor monotherapy versus combination therapy for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: combined analysis of European biologics databases AID - 10.3899/jrheum.190815 DP - 2020 Apr 01 TA - The Journal of Rheumatology PG - jrheum.190815 4099 - http://www.jrheum.org/content/early/2020/03/25/jrheum.190815.short 4100 - http://www.jrheum.org/content/early/2020/03/25/jrheum.190815.full AB - Objective To investigate whether tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) combination therapy with conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) is more effective for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and/or improves TNFi drug survival compared to TNFi monotherapy. Methods Five PsA biologics cohorts were investigated between 2000 and 2015; the ATTRA registry (Czech Republic), the Swiss Clinical Quality Management PsA registry, the Hellenic Registry of Biologics Therapies (Greece), the University of Bari PsA biologics database (Italy) and the Bath PsA cohort (UK). Drug persistence was analysed using Kaplan-Meier and equality of survival using Log-Rank tests. Comparative effectiveness was investigated using logistic regression with propensity scores. Separate analyses were performed on: (a) the combined Italian/Swiss cohorts for change in rate of DAS-28; and (b) the combined Italian, Swiss and Bath cohorts for change in rate of HAQ. Results In total, 2294 patients were eligible for the drug survival analysis. In the Swiss (p=0.002), Greek (p=0.021) and Bath (p=0.014) databases patients starting TNFi in combination with MTX had longer drug survival compared to monotherapy, whilst in Italy the monotherapy group persisted longer (p=0.030). In patients from the combined Italian/Swiss dataset (n=1066) there was no significant difference between treatment arms in rate of change of DAS28. Similarly, when also including the Bath cohort (n=1205) there was no significant difference in rate of change of HAQ. Conclusion Combination therapy of a TNFi with a csDMARD does not appear to affect improvement of disease activity or HAQ versus TNFi monotherapy but may improve TNFi drug survival.