RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibition in Male and Female Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: Data from a Swiss Cohort JF The Journal of Rheumatology JO J Rheumatol FD The Journal of Rheumatology SP jrheum.170166 DO 10.3899/jrheum.170166 A1 Monika Hebeisen A1 Regula Neuenschwander A1 Almut Scherer A1 Pascale Exer A1 Ulrich Weber A1 Giorgio Tamborrini A1 Raphael Micheroli A1 Lukas M. Wildi A1 Pascal Zufferey A1 Michael J. Nissen A1 Peter M. Villiger A1 Jürg Bernhard A1 Axel Finckh A1 Irene E. van der Horst-Bruinsma A1 Joachim Sieper A1 Robert Landewé A1 Désirée van der Heijde A1 Adrian Ciurea YR 2018 UL http://www.jrheum.org/content/early/2018/02/08/jrheum.170166.abstract AB Objective To investigate sex differences in connection with the effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Methods A total of 440 patients with AS (294 men; 146 women) initiating a first TNFi in the prospective Swiss Clinical Quality Management Cohort were included. We evaluated the proportion of patients achieving the 20% and 40% improvement in the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society criteria (ASAS20 and ASAS40) as well as Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) improvement and status scores at 1 year. Patients having discontinued TNFi were considered nonresponders. Logistic regression analyses were performed to adjust for important predictors of response. Results Compared to men, female patients had lower mean C-reactive protein levels, better spinal mobility, and more peripheral disease at the start. There was no sex disparity with regard to the ASDAS, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity and Functional indices, and the quality of life. At 1 year, 52% of women and 63% of men achieved an ASAS20 response (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.37–1.07, p = 0.09). An inactive disease status (ASDAS < 1.3) was reached by 18% of women and 26% of men (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.32–1.27, p = 0.22). These sex differences in response to TNFi were more pronounced in adjusted analyses (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.16–0.71, p = 0.005 for ASAS20 and OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.03–0.31, p < 0.001 for ASDAS < 1.3) and confirmed for all the other outcomes assessed. Conclusion In AS, fewer women respond to TNFi and women show a reduced response in comparison to men.