TY - JOUR T1 - Development and Alpha-testing of a Stepped Decision Aid for Patients Considering Nonsurgical Options for Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis Management JF - The Journal of Rheumatology JO - J Rheumatol SP - 1891 LP - 1896 DO - 10.3899/jrheum.150736 VL - 43 IS - 10 AU - Karine Toupin April AU - Tamara Rader AU - Gillian A. Hawker AU - Dawn Stacey AU - Annette M. O’Connor AU - Vivian Welch AU - Anne Lyddiatt AU - Jessie McGowan AU - J. Carter Thorne AU - Carol Bennett AU - Jordi Pardo Pardo AU - George A. Wells AU - Peter Tugwell Y1 - 2016/10/01 UR - http://www.jrheum.org/content/43/10/1891.abstract N2 - Objective. To develop an innovative stepped patient decision aid (StDA) comparing the benefits and harms of 13 nonsurgical treatment options for managing osteoarthritis (OA) and to evaluate its acceptability and effects on informed decision making.Methods. Guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and the International Patient Decision Aid Standards, the process involved (1) developing a decision aid with evidence on 13 nonsurgical treatments from the 2012 American College of Rheumatology OA clinical practice guidelines; and (2) interviewing patients with OA and healthcare providers to test its acceptability and effects on knowledge and decisional conflict.Results. The StDA helped make the decision explicit, and presented evidence on 13 OA treatments clustered into 5 steps or levels according to their benefits and harms. Probabilities of benefits and harms were presented using pictograms of 100 faces formatted to allow comparisons across sets of options. It also included a values clarification exercise and knowledge test. Feedback was obtained from 49 patients and 7 healthcare providers. They found that the StDA presented evidence in a clear manner, and helped patients clarify their values and make an informed decision. Some participants found that there was too much information and others said that there was not enough on each treatment option.Conclusion. This innovative StDA allows patients to consider both the evidence and their values for multiple options. The findings are being used to revise and plan future evaluation. The StDA is an example of how research evidence in guidelines can be implemented in practice. ER -