RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Whole Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features in Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis in Conjunction with Clinical Variables to Whole Body MRI and Clinical Variables in Ankylosing Spondylitis
JF The Journal of Rheumatology
JO J Rheumatol
FD The Journal of Rheumatology
SP 335
OP 342
DO 10.3899/jrheum.150162
VO 43
IS 2
A1 Bettina G. Weiss
A1 Lucas M. Bachmann
A1 Christian W.A. Pfirrmann
A1 Rudolf O. Kissling
A1 Veronika Zubler
YR 2016
UL http://www.jrheum.org/content/43/2/335.abstract
AB Objective. Discrimination of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) can be challenging. Usefulness of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) in diagnosing spondyloarthritis has been recently proved. We assessed the value of clinical variables alone and in combination with WB-MRI to distinguish between DISH and AS.Methods. Diagnostic case-control study: 33 patients with AS and 15 patients with DISH were included. All patients underwent 1.5 Tesla WB-MRI scanning. MR scans were read by a blinded radiologist using the Canadian-Danish Working Group’s recommendation. Imaging and clinical variables were identified using the bootstrap. The most important variables from MR and clinical history were assessed in a multivariate fashion resulting in 3 diagnostic models (MRI, clinical, and combined). The discriminative capacity was quantified using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The strength of diagnostic variables was quantified with OR.Results. Forty-eight patients provided 1545 positive findings (193 DISH/1352 AS). The final MR model contained upper anterior corner fat infiltration (32 DISH/181 AS), ankylosis on the vertebral endplate (4 DISH/60 AS), facet joint ankylosis (4 DISH/49 AS), sacroiliac joint edema (11 DISH/91 AS), sacroiliac joint fat infiltration (2 DISH/114 AS), sacroiliac joint ankylosis (2 DISH/119 AS); area under the ROC curve was 0.71, 95% CI 0.64–0.78. The final clinical model contained patient’s age and body mass index (area under the ROC curve 0.90, 95% CI 0.89–0.91). The full diagnostic model containing clinical and MR information had an area under the ROC curve of 0.93 (95% CI 0.92–0.95).Conclusion. WB-MRI features can contribute to the correct diagnosis after a thorough conventional workup of patients with DISH and AS.