RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Development of a Draft Core Set of Domains for Measuring Shared Decision Making in Osteoarthritis: An OMERACT Working Group on Shared Decision Making
JF The Journal of Rheumatology
JO J Rheumatol
FD The Journal of Rheumatology
SP 2442
OP 2447
DO 10.3899/jrheum.141205
VO 42
IS 12
A1 Toupin-April, Karine
A1 Barton, Jennifer
A1 Fraenkel, Liana
A1 Li, Linda
A1 Grandpierre, Viviane
A1 Guillemin, Francis
A1 Rader, Tamara
A1 Stacey, Dawn
A1 Légaré, France
A1 Jull, Janet
A1 Petkovic, Jennifer
A1 Scholte-Voshaar, Marieke
A1 Welch, Vivian
A1 Lyddiatt, Anne
A1 Hofstetter, Cathie
A1 De Wit, Maarten
A1 March, Lyn
A1 Meade, Tanya
A1 Christensen, Robin
A1 Gaujoux-Viala, Cécile
A1 Suarez-Almazor, Maria E.
A1 Boonen, Annelies
A1 Pohl, Christoph
A1 Martin, Richard
A1 Tugwell, Peter S.
YR 2015
UL http://www.jrheum.org/content/42/12/2442.abstract
AB Objective. Despite the importance of shared decision making for delivering patient-centered care in rheumatology, there is no consensus on how to measure its process and outcomes. The aim of this Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) working group is to determine the core set of domains for measuring shared decision making in intervention studies in adults with osteoarthritis (OA), from the perspectives of patients, health professionals, and researchers.Methods. We followed the OMERACT Filter 2.0 method to develop a draft core domain set by (1) forming an OMERACT working group; (2) conducting a review of domains of shared decision making; and (3) obtaining opinions of all those involved using a modified nominal group process held at a session activity at the OMERACT 12 meeting.Results. In all, 26 people from Europe, North America, and Australia, including 5 patient research partners, participated in the session activity. Participants identified the following domains for measuring shared decision making to be included as part of the draft core set: (1) identifying the decision, (2) exchanging information, (3) clarifying views, (4) deliberating, (5) making the decision, (6) putting the decision into practice, and (7) assessing the effect of the decision. Contextual factors were also suggested.Conclusion. We proposed a draft core set of shared decision-making domains for OA intervention research studies. Next steps include a workshop at OMERACT 13 to reach consensus on these proposed domains in the wider OMERACT group, as well as to detail subdomains and assess instruments to develop a core outcome measurement set.