PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Sophie Roux
AU  - Michèle Beaulieu
AU  - Marie-Claude Beaulieu
AU  - François Cabana
AU  - Gilles Boire
TI  - Priming Primary Care Physicians to Treat Osteoporosis After a Fragility Fracture: An Integrated Multidisciplinary Approach
AID  - 10.3899/jrheum.120908
DP  - 2013 May 01
TA  - The Journal of Rheumatology
PG  - 703--711
VI  - 40
IP  - 5
4099  - http://www.jrheum.org/content/40/5/703.short
4100  - http://www.jrheum.org/content/40/5/703.full
SO  - J Rheumatol2013 May 01; 40
AB  - Objective. To evaluate 2 incremental levels of intervention designed to increase initiation of osteoporosis treatment by primary care physicians (PCP) following fragility fractures (FF). Methods. Women and men over age 50 years were screened for incident FF in fracture clinics, and eligible outpatients were randomly assigned to standard care (SC) or to either minimal (MIN) or intensive (INT) interventions. The MIN and INT interventions were intended to educate and motivate both patients and PCP, but differed in their frequency of contact and information content. Delivery of osteoporosis medication was confirmed with pharmacists. Treatment rates were analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach. Results. At inclusion, 74.3% of 881 outpatients with FF were untreated. Followup at 12 months was completed in 92.3% of patients. Up to 90% of patients treated at inclusion remained treated at 12 months. Among patients who initially were untreated, 18.8% in the SC group, 40.4% in the MIN, and 53.2% in the INT groups were treated at 12 months. Change in treatment rates (adjusted for age and initial treatment) increased significantly after both MIN and INT. Only the INT intervention significantly increased treatment rates in patients with previous fractures. Negative predictors of change in treatment status included non-major FF, age younger than 65 years, and male sex. Conclusion. Both interventions significantly increased initiation of osteoporosis treatment. Our multidisciplinary intervention builds on existing first-line structures and uses minimal specialized resources. Iterative and systematic interventions in the context of clinical care may modify the approach of PCP to osteoporosis management after FF and narrow the care gap in the long term.