PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - PHILIP MEASE AU - LESLEY M. ARNOLD AU - ERNEST H. CHOY AU - DANIEL J. CLAUW AU - LESLIE J. CROFFORD AU - JENNIFER M. GLASS AU - SUSAN A. MARTIN AU - JESSICA MOREA AU - LEE SIMON AU - C. VIBEKE STRAND AU - DAVID A. WILLIAMS TI - Fibromyalgia Syndrome Module at OMERACT 9: Domain Construct AID - 10.3899/jrheum.090367 DP - 2009 Oct 01 TA - The Journal of Rheumatology PG - 2318--2329 VI - 36 IP - 10 4099 - http://www.jrheum.org/content/36/10/2318.short 4100 - http://www.jrheum.org/content/36/10/2318.full SO - J Rheumatol2009 Oct 01; 36 AB - The objective of the module was to (1) establish a core domain set for fibromyalgia (FM) assessment in clinical trials and practice, (2) review outcome measure performance characteristics, (3) discuss development of a responder index for assessment of FM in clinical trials, (4) review objective markers, (5) review the domain of cognitive dysfunction, and (6) establish a research agenda for outcomes research. Presentations at the module included: (1) Results of univariate and multivariate analysis of 10 FM clinical trials of 4 drugs, mapping key domains identified in previous patient focus group: Delphi exercises and a clinician/researcher Delphi exercise, and breakout discussions to vote on possible essential domains and reliable measures; (2) Updates regarding outcome measure status; (3) Update on objective markers to measure FM disease state; and (4) Review of the issue of cognitive dysfunction (dyscognition) in FM. Consensus was reached as follows: (1) Greater than 70% of OMERACT participants agreed that pain, tenderness, fatigue, patient global, multidimensional function and sleep disturbance domains should be measured in all FM clinical trials; dyscognition and depression should be measured in some trials; and stiffness, anxiety, functional imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers were identified as domains of research interest. (2) FM domain outcome measures have generally proven to be reliable, discriminative, and feasible. More sophisticated and comprehensive measures are in development, as is a responder index for FM. (3) Increasing numbers of objective markers are being developed for FM assessment. (4) Cognitive dysfunction assessment by self-assessed and applied outcome measures is being developed. In conclusion, a multidimensional symptom core set is proposed for evaluation of FM in clinical trials. Research on improved measures of single domains and composite measures is ongoing.