%PDF-1.4
%
70 0 obj
<>
endobj
66 0 obj
<>
endobj
124 0 obj
<>stream
Acrobat Distiller 5.0 for Macintosh
2002-12-09T23:06:10Z
2024-03-28T22:34:47-07:00
2024-03-28T22:34:47-07:00
QuarkXPress. 4.11: AdobePS 8.7.2 (104)
application/pdf
Heather
2001-627.jan
uuid:79da751e-1dd2-11b2-0a00-910827bd7700
uuid:79da7520-1dd2-11b2-0a00-900000000000
endstream
endobj
55 0 obj
<>
endobj
56 0 obj
<>
endobj
71 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Rotate 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
1 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Rotate 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
4 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/XObject<>>>/Rotate 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/XObject<>>>/Rotate 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
40 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Rotate 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
43 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Rotate 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
146 0 obj
[150 0 R]
endobj
147 0 obj
<>stream
1 g
/GS0 gs
0 792 m
0 792 l
f
q
-1 793 614 -794 re
W n
q
0 792.03 612 -792 re
W n
BT
/CS0 cs 0 0 0 1 scn
/GS1 gs
/T1_0 1 Tf
-0.00011 Tc 0.02499 Tw 8 0 0 8 57 714.5293 Tm
[(14.)-875.1 (Mughal MZ, )17.7 (W)79.9 (ard K, Qayyum N, Langton CM. )54.8 (Assessment of)]TJ
2.175 -1.25 Td
[(bone status using the contact ultrasound bone analyser)54.8 (. )54.8 (Arch Dis)]TJ
0 Tc 0 -1.25 TD
(Child 1997;76:535-6.)Tj
-0.00011 Tc -2.175 -1.25 Td
[(15.)-875.1 (Massie )54.8 (A, Reid DM, Porter R)54.8 (W)91.9 (. Screening for osteoporosis:)]TJ
2.175 -1.25 Td
[(comparison between dual ener)17.7 (gy x-ray absorptiometry and)]TJ
T*
(broadband ultrasound attenuation in 1000 perimenopausal women.)Tj
T*
(Osteoporosis Int 1993;3:107-10.)Tj
-2.175 -1.25 Td
[(16.)-875.1 (Roux C, Fournier B, Laugier P)110.7 (, et al. Broadband ultrasound)]TJ
2.175 -1.25 Td
(attenuation imaging: a new imaging method in osteoporosis. J Bone)Tj
T*
[(Miner Res 1996;1)36.8 (1:1)36.8 (1)36.8 (12-8.)]TJ
-2.175 -1.25 Td
[(17.)-875.1 (Njeh CF)79.7 (, Boivin CM, Langton CM. )17.7 (The role of ultrasound in the)]TJ
2.175 -1.25 Td
[(assessment of osteoporosis: a review)64.9 (. Osteoporosis Int 1997;7:7-22.)]TJ
-2.175 -1.25 Td
[(18.)-875.1 (Baran DT)73.9 (, McCarthy CK, Leahey D, Lew R. Broadband ultrasound)]TJ
2.175 -1.25 Td
(attenuation of the calcaneum predicts lumbar and femoral neck)Tj
T*
[(density in Caucasian women: a preliminary study)64.8 (. Osteoporosis Int)]TJ
0 Tc 0 Tw T*
[(1991;1:1)36.9 (10-3.)]TJ
-0.00011 Tc 0.02499 Tw -2.175 -1.25 Td
[(19.)-875.1 (Gluer CC, )17.7 (W)39.9 (u)-0.1 ( CY)128.8 (, Genant HK. Broadband ultrasound attenuation)]TJ
2.175 -1.25 Td
[(signals depend on trabecular orientation: )54.8 (An in vitro study)64.8 (.)]TJ
T*
(Osteoporosis Int 1993;3:185-91.)Tj
-2.175 -1.25 Td
[(20.)-875.1 (Hans D, )54.8 (Arlot ME, Schott )54.8 (AM, Roux JP)110.7 (, Kotzki PO, Meunier PJ.)]TJ
2.175 -1.25 Td
(Do ultrasound measurements on the os calcis reflect more the bone)Tj
T*
[(microarchitecture than the bone mass? )54.8 (A)-220.1 (two\320dimensional)]TJ
T*
[(histomorphometric study)64.8 (. Bone 1995;16:295-300.)]TJ
-2.175 -1.25 Td
[(21.)-875.1 (Jaworski M, Lebiedowski M, Lorenc RS, )17.7 (T)35 (rempe J. Ultrasound)]TJ
2.175 -1.25 Td
[(bone measurement in pediatric subjects. Calcif )17.7 (T)35 (issue Int)]TJ
0 Tc 0 Tw T*
(1995;56:368-71.)Tj
-0.00011 Tc 0.02499 Tw -2.175 -1.25 Td
[(22.)-875.1 (Mughal MZ, Langton CM, Utretch G, Morrison J, Specker BL.)]TJ
2.175 -1.25 Td
(Comparison between broad-band ultrasound attenuation of the)Tj
T*
[(calcaneum and total body mineral density in children. )54.8 (Acta Paediatr)]TJ
0 Tc 0 Tw T*
(1996;85:663-5.)Tj
-0.00011 Tc 0.02499 Tw 30.825 36.25 Td
[(23.)-875.1 (Al-Mayouf S, Feldman B, Hawker G, et al. Pilot study of)]TJ
2.175 -1.25 Td
(quantitative heel ultrasound evaluation of corticosteroid induced)Tj
T*
[(osteoporosis in children: comparison with dual ener)17.7 (gy x-ray)]TJ
T*
[(absorptiometry [abstract]. )54.8 (Arthritis Rheum 1997;40 Suppl:S240.)]TJ
-2.175 -1.25 Td
[(24.)-875.1 (Falcini F)79.7 (, Bindi G, Ermini M, et al. Comparison of quantitative)]TJ
2.175 -1.25 Td
[(calcaneal ultrasound and dual ener)17.7 (gy X-ray absorptiometry in the)]TJ
T*
(evaluation of osteoporotic risk in children with chronic rheumatic)Tj
T*
[(diseases. Calcif )17.7 (T)35 (issue Int 2000;67:19-23.)]TJ
-2.175 -1.25 Td
[(25.)-875.1 (T)69.9 (anner JM, )17.7 (Whitehouse RH. Clinical longitudinal standards for)]TJ
2.175 -1.25 Td
[(height, weight, height velocity)64.8 (, weight velocity and stages of)]TJ
T*
[(puberty)64.8 (. )54.8 (Arch Dis Child 1976;51:170-9.)]TJ
-2.175 -1.25 Td
[(26.)-875.1 (Bianchi LM, Cimaz R, Bardare M, et al. Ef)17.7 (ficacy and safety of)]TJ
2.175 -1.25 Td
[(alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis in dif)17.7 (fuse connective)]TJ
T*
[(tissue diseases in children: a prospective multicenter study)64.8 (. )54.8 (Arthritis)]TJ
0 Tc T*
(Rheum 2000;43:1960-6.)Tj
-0.00011 Tc -2.175 -1.25 Td
[(27.)-875.1 (Baroncelli GI, Saggese G. Critical ages and stages of puberty in the)]TJ
2.175 -1.25 Td
(accumulation of spinal and femoral bone mass: the validity of bone)Tj
T*
(mass measurements. Horm Res 2000;54 Supp 1:2-8.)Tj
-2.175 -1.25 Td
[(28.)-875.1 (Njeh CF)79.7 (, Fuerst )17.7 (T)74 (, Diesel E, Genant HK. Is quantitative ultrasound)]TJ
2.175 -1.25 Td
[(dependent on bone structure? )54.8 (A)-220.1 (reflection. Osteoporosis Int)]TJ
0 Tc 0 Tw T*
(2001;12:1-15.)Tj
-0.00011 Tc 0.02499 Tw -2.175 -1.25 Td
[(29.)-875.1 (Njeh CF)79.7 (, Shaw N, Gardner)19.7 (-Medwin JM, Boivin CM, Southwood)]TJ
2.175 -1.25 Td
(TR. Use of quantitative ultrasound to assess bone status in children)Tj
T*
[(with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: )54.8 (A)-220.1 (pilot study)64.8 (. J Clin Densitom)]TJ
0 Tc 0 Tw T*
(2000;3:251-60.)Tj
-0.00011 Tc 0.02499 Tw -2.175 -1.25 Td
[(30.)-875.1 (V)110.8 (an den Ber)17.7 (gh JP)110.8 (, Noordam C, Ozyilmaz )54.8 (A, Hermus )54.8 (AR, Smals)]TJ
2.175 -1.25 Td
(AG, Otten BJ. Calcaneal ultrasound imaging in healthy children)Tj
T*
[(and adolescents: relation of the ultrasound parameters BUA)-220.2 (and)]TJ
T*
(SOS to age, body weight, height, foot dimensions and pubertal)Tj
T*
[(stage. Osteoporosis Int 2000;1)36.8 (1:967-76.)]TJ
ET
0 0 0 0 scn
440 777 117 -27 re
f
BT
0 0 0 1 scn
/T1_1 1 Tf
0 Tw 20.37 0 0 21 441 760.6089 Tm
(2001-627-6)Tj
ET
/CS0 CS 0 0 0 1 SCN
54 54 m
558 54 l
S
BT
/T1_2 1 Tf
0.02499 Tw 8 0 0 8 424.3613 35.9844 Tm
(The Journal of Rheumatology 2003; 30:1)Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw -46.2952 -0.0313 Td
(184)Tj
ET
0 0 0 0 scn
/GS0 gs
108.27 59.1 396.48 -10.84 re
f
0.5 w
108.27 59.1 396.48 -10.84 re
S
Q
Q
q
0 0 612 792 re
W n
BT
0 0 0 rg
/GS2 gs
/T1_3 8 Tf
117.48 51 Td
(Personal, non-commercial use only. The Journal of Rheumatology Copyrig\
ht \251 2003. All rights reserved.)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
/GS2 gs
/T1_4 1 Tf
10 0 0 10 540 17 Tm
( )Tj
0 0.48627 0.77255 rg
/GS2 gs
-7.22298 0 Td
(www.jrheum.org)Tj
0 g
/GS2 gs
-16.72996 0 Td
(Downloaded on March 28, 2024 from )Tj
ET
endstream
endobj
83 0 obj
<>
endobj
75 0 obj
<>
endobj
74 0 obj
<>
endobj
111 0 obj
<>
endobj
129 0 obj
<>
endobj
73 0 obj
<>
endobj
105 0 obj
<>stream
HiPSY/<#ð(Dgl"#hkh(!$!$ Q@YT
mlEۚ顪e&:LݪfwDR>ig^aj>:ʌvr@ѩ_lAl]mfV%HIbjRcJ&yHKQ{ӎ a(ߔ㬈DJ!z]JDMFԉL2<YY~vv]]/ vƺ1i'RBxxEPunתRJZTN;K">[Syƕ]n昴RV4R-vFX[Kkڇy? "^̪Muog裦7magRH`gG0xń@'b@qKLY%<"-LV *Q䝊lyǢs
$|=urXV(.J.k.4Wi{uF&bOu/HS&)Y:z[LkA..zRI1Oլ?u IQb 2Ypl}k
{L:%Q
7(VE>u%KWE5
B(Nɭ`|F+Z~@6]d]3<<jIEH֞>13680ggoLbXsZIyb"Dj݉,%h)sSd!Kԝ(~\ߟ%)->[_gvAwu?q5k_ ˢ8f[`lSvaўLJ͌ij!c(Rz |~®^(^=|pC.qRҝp%q0xefa>vWRd<wMMU>#Vv]# <ßyucsg(q