%PDF-1.4
%
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
76 0 obj
<>stream
Acrobat Distiller 4.05 for Macintosh
2004-12-03T13:08:58Z
2024-03-29T03:22:37-07:00
QuarkXPressª: AdobePS 8.6 (219)
2024-03-29T03:22:37-07:00
application/pdf
Heather
2001-474.mar
uuid:e0ca9ca2-1dd1-11b2-0a00-d30827edca00
uuid:e0ca9ca5-1dd1-11b2-0a00-380000000000
endstream
endobj
13 0 obj
<>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Rotate 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
1 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Rotate 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
4 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Rotate 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
86 0 obj
[90 0 R]
endobj
87 0 obj
<>stream
1 g
/GS0 gs
0 792 m
0 792 l
f
q
-1 793 614 -794 re
W n
q
0 792.06 612 -792 re
W n
/CS0 CS 0 0 0 1 SCN
/GS1 gs
54 54 m
558 54 l
S
BT
/CS0 cs 0 0 0 1 scn
/TT0 1 Tf
0.02499 Tw 8 0 0 8 424.3613 35.9844 Tm
(The Journal of Rheumatology 2002; 29:3)Tj
0 Tw -46.2952 -0.0313 Td
(556)Tj
ET
0 0 0 0 scn
/GS0 gs
100.93 59.08 407.5 -10.83 re
f*
0.5 w
100.93 59.08 407.5 -10.83 re
S
BT
0 0 0 1 scn
/GS1 gs
/TT1 1 Tf
0.0098 Tw 10 0 0 10 54 713.1616 Tm
(unknown. During walking, the weight of the body is medial)Tj
0.0648 Tw 0 -1.2 TD
(to the knee, resulting in a compressive force on the medial)Tj
0.18449 Tw T*
(aspect and a stretching force on the lateral aspect of the)Tj
0 Tw T*
(knee)Tj
6.5 0 0 6.5 72.8769 680.4615 Tm
(8)Tj
0.0658 Tw 10 0 0 10 76.1269 677.1616 Tm
[(. )17.8 (Thus one may expect thicker cartilage in the medial)]TJ
0.0623 Tw -2.2127 -1.2 Td
(compartment, as seen in the bovine knee)Tj
0 Tw 6.5 0 0 6.5 220.1798 668.4615 Tm
(9)Tj
0.0623 Tw 10 0 0 10 226.5532 665.1616 Tm
(and in beagles)Tj
0 Tw 6.5 0 0 6.5 284.9999 668.4615 Tm
(10)Tj
10 0 0 10 291.4998 665.1616 Tm
(,)Tj
0.1385 Tw -23.75 -1.2 Td
[(with loading patterns similar to humans. )17.8 (Why cartilage is)]TJ
0.00591 Tw T*
[(not thicker medially in humans is unclear)54.9 (. However)39.8 (, consis-)]TJ
0.0295 Tw T*
[(tent with our findings, a recent study of 1)36.8 (1 human cadavers)]TJ
0.1264 Tw T*
(has suggested an inverse relation between the mean carti-)Tj
0.03571 Tw T*
(lage thickness and mean compressive modulus in the lower)Tj
0.02499 Tw T*
(limb joints)Tj
-0.0567 Tc 0 Tw 6.5 0 0 6.5 97.3091 596.4615 Tm
(11)Tj
0 Tc 10 0 0 10 103.4404 593.1616 Tm
(.)Tj
-0.00011 Tc 0.02119 Tw -3.744 -1.2 Td
[(Our group and others have described sex ef)17.8 (fects on knee)]TJ
0 Tc 0 Tw -1.2 -1.2 Td
(cartilage)Tj
6.5 0 0 6.5 88.4165 572.4615 Tm
(4,12-14)Tj
-0.00011 Tc 0.18781 Tw 10 0 0 10 108.4543 569.1616 Tm
[(. However)39.7 (, the ef)17.7 (fects of BMI and physical)]TJ
0 Tc 0.00861 Tw -5.4454 -1.2 Td
[(activity are less clear)54.9 (. In a study of 1)36.9 (1)0.1 ( cadavers, the mass of)]TJ
0.1886 Tw T*
(specimen donors was found to correlate with mean knee)Tj
0.2094 Tw T*
(cartilage thickness)Tj
-0.0567 Tc 0 Tw 6.5 0 0 6.5 130.223 536.4616 Tm
(11)Tj
-0.00011 Tc 0.2095 Tw 10 0 0 10 136.3543 533.1616 Tm
[(. )54.9 (Another study showed a correlation)]TJ
0 Tc 0.00661 Tw -8.2354 -1.2 Td
(between knee cartilage thickness and body weight in men)Tj
0 Tw 6.5 0 0 6.5 285.0001 524.4615 Tm
(13)Tj
10 0 0 10 291.5001 521.1616 Tm
(.)Tj
0.1364 Tw -23.75 -1.2 Td
(In healthy children, we showed that physical activity was)Tj
-0.01489 Tw T*
(associated with an increase in knee cartilage)Tj
0 Tw 6.5 0 0 6.5 230.2334 500.4616 Tm
(5)Tj
-0.00011 Tc -0.01469 Tw 10 0 0 10 233.4834 497.1616 Tm
[(. However)39.7 (, in a)]TJ
0 Tc 0.0318 Tw -17.9483 -1.2 Td
(small study of adults, the mean and maximal knee cartilage)Tj
0.00639 Tc 0.36861 Tw T*
(thicknesses, although not statistically significant, were)Tj
0 Tc 0.062 Tw T*
(lower in the medial femoral condyle and in the medial and)Tj
0.0058 Tw T*
[(lateral tibial plateau in 1)36.9 (1 triathletes compared to physically)]TJ
0.1223 Tw T*
(inactive volunteers)Tj
0 Tw 6.5 0 0 6.5 131.0235 440.4616 Tm
(15)Tj
0.12219 Tw 10 0 0 10 137.5235 437.1616 Tm
[(. It may be that the ef)17.9 (fect of physical)]TJ
0.02499 Tw -8.3524 -1.2 Td
[(activity on knee cartilage dif)17.8 (fers in adults and children.)]TJ
0.0063 Tw 1.2 -1.2 Td
(There are a number of potential limitations in using MRI)Tj
0.0284 Tw -1.2 -1.2 Td
[(for cartilage estimates. )17.8 (The accurate delineation of articular)]TJ
0.3546 Tw T*
(cartilage depends on high contrast relative to adjacent)Tj
0.17709 Tw T*
(tissues. Our method has been validated against cadavers)Tj
0 Tw 6.5 0 0 6.5 290.7501 380.4616 Tm
(4)Tj
0.02139 Tw 10 0 0 10 54 365.1616 Tm
[(and has excellent reproducibility)64.9 (, with coef)17.8 (ficients of varia-)]TJ
0.0287 Tw T*
(tion of 2\2263% that compare very favorably to the magnitude)Tj
-0.00011 Tc 0.0479 Tw T*
[(of the dif)17.7 (ferences reported. Further)39.7 (, in order to improve in-)]TJ
0 Tc 0.2263 Tw T*
(plane resolution we used a matrix of 512 )Tj
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tw 18.3602 0 Td
(\002)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0.2263 Tw 1.0251 0 Td
(512 pixels,)Tj
0.02499 Tw -19.3853 -1.2 Td
(resulting in an in-plane resolution of 0.31 )Tj
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tw 17.0036 0 Td
(\002)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0.8238 0 Td
(0.31.)Tj
0.0188 Tw -16.6275 -1.2 Td
[(This study supports the knee compartment dif)17.9 (ferences in)]TJ
0.19231 Tw -1.2 -1.2 Td
(knee cartilage volume recently reported in children. It is)Tj
0.0464 Tw T*
[(likely these dif)17.8 (ferences are maintained throughout life. )17.8 (The)]TJ
-0.0085 Tw T*
(possibility that the amount of knee cartilage in an individual)Tj
-0.01331 Tw T*
[(is a risk factor for OA)-181.8 (now needs to be tested in longitudinal)]TJ
-0.00011 Tc 0 Tw T*
(studies.)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
0 -2.4 TD
(ACKNOWLEDGMENT)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 Tc 0.06641 Tw 8 0 0 8 54 211.1616 Tm
[(Thanks to )17.8 (V)60.1 (ikki )17.8 (White for coordinating recruitment of the female partici-)]TJ
0.02499 Tw 0 -1.25 TD
(pants. Special thanks to the participants, who made this study possible.\
)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
-0.00011 Tc 0 Tw 10 0 0 10 318 713.1616 Tm
(REFERENCES)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0.02499 Tw 8 0 0 8 325 703.1616 Tm
[(1.)-875.1 (Felson DT)73.9 (, Naimark )54.8 (A, )54.8 (Anderson JJ, Kazis L, Castelli )17.7 (W)91.7 (,)-0.1 ( Meenan)]TJ
0 Tc 1.675 -1.25 Td
[(RF)79.8 (. )17.8 (The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly: )17.8 (The)]TJ
T*
[(Framingham Osteoarthritis Study)64.9 (. )54.8 (Arthritis Rheum 1987;30:914-8.)]TJ
-0.00011 Tc -1.675 -1.25 Td
[(2.)-875.1 (T)69.7 (sai CL, Liu )17.7 (TK. Osteoarthritis in women: its relationship to)]TJ
0 Tc 1.675 -1.25 Td
(estrogen and current trends. Life Sci 1992;50:1737-44.)Tj
-1.675 -1.25 Td
[(3.)-875 (Ledingham J, Regan M, Jones )54.8 (A, Doherty M. Radiographic patterns)]TJ
1.675 -1.25 Td
[(of osteoarthritis of the knee in patients referred to hospital. )54.9 (Ann)]TJ
T*
(Rheum Dis 1993;52:520-6.)Tj
-0.00011 Tc -1.675 -1.25 Td
[(4.)-875.1 (Cicuttini F)79.7 (, Forbes )54.8 (A, Morris K, Darling S, Bailey M, Stuckey S.)]TJ
0 Tc 1.675 -1.25 Td
[(Gender dif)17.8 (ferences in knee cartilage volume as measured by)]TJ
T*
(magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1999;)Tj
0 Tw T*
(7:265-71.)Tj
-0.00011 Tc 0.02499 Tw -1.675 -1.25 Td
[(5.)-875.1 (Jones G, Glisson M, Kristen Hynes K, Cicuttini F)79.7 (.)-0.1 ( Gender and site)]TJ
0 Tc 1.675 -1.25 Td
[(dif)17.8 (ferences in cartilage development: a possible explanation for)]TJ
T*
[(variations in knee osteoarthritis in later life. )54.8 (Arthritis Rheum)]TJ
0 Tw T*
(2000;43:2543-9.)Tj
0.02499 Tw -1.675 -1.25 Td
[(6.)-875 (Bellamy N. Outcome measures in osteoarthritis clinical trials. )]TJ
1.675 -1.25 Td
(J Rheumatol 1995;22 Suppl 43:49-51.)Tj
-0.00011 Tc -1.675 -1.25 Td
[(7.)-875.1 (Spector )17.7 (TD, Cicuttini FM, Baker J, Hart DJ. Genetic influences on)]TJ
1.675 -1.25 Td
[(osteoarthritis: a twin study)64.8 (. BMJ 1996;312:940-3.)]TJ
0 Tc -1.675 -1.25 Td
[(8.)-875 (Perry J. Gait analysis: normal and pathological function. )17.8 (Thorofare,)]TJ
1.675 -1.25 Td
(UK: Slack Inc.; 1992.)Tj
-0.00011 Tc -1.675 -1.25 Td
[(9.)-875.1 (Armstrong SJ, Read RA, Price R. )17.7 (T)69.7 (opographical variation within)]TJ
0 Tc 1.675 -1.25 Td
(the articular cartilage and subchondral bone of the normal ovine)Tj
T*
(knee joint: a histological approach. Osteoarthritis Cartilage)Tj
0 Tw T*
(1995;3:25-33.)Tj
-0.00011 Tc 0.02499 Tw -2.175 -1.25 Td
[(10.)-875.1 (Kiviranta I, )17.7 (T)69.7 (a)-0.1 (mmi M, Jurvelin J, Helminen HJ. )17.7 (T)69.7 (opographical)]TJ
0 Tc 2.175 -1.25 Td
(variation of glycosaminoglycan content and cartilage thickness in)Tj
T*
[(canine knee \(stifle\) joint cartilage. )54.9 (Application of the)]TJ
T*
[(microspectrophotometric method. J )54.9 (Anatomy 1987;150:265-76.)]TJ
-2.1381 -1.25 Td
[(1)36.9 (1.)-875 (Shepherd DE, Seedhom BB. )17.8 (Thickness of human articular cartilage)]TJ
2.1381 -1.25 Td
[(in joints of the lower limb. )54.9 (Ann Rheum Dis 1999;58:27-34.)]TJ
-0.00011 Tc -2.175 -1.25 Td
[(12.)-875.1 (Cova M, Frezza F)79.7 (, Shariat-Razavi I, Ukmar M, Mucelli RS, Dalla)]TJ
0 Tc 2.175 -1.25 Td
(Palma L. Magnetic resonance assessment of knee joint hyaline)Tj
T*
(cartilage according to age, sex, and body weight. Radiol Med)Tj
0 Tw T*
(1996;92:171-9.)Tj
0.0249 Tw -2.175 -1.25 Td
[(13.)-875 (Hall FM, )17.7 (W)59.8 (yshak G. )17.7 (Thickness of articular cartilage in the normal)]TJ
2.175 -1.25 Td
[(knee. J Bone Joint Sur)17.8 (g )54.9 (Am 1980;62:408-13.)]TJ
-2.175 -1.25 Td
[(14.)-875 (Dalla Palma L, Cova M, Pozzi-Mucelli RS. MRI appearance of the)]TJ
2.175 -1.25 Td
(articular cartilage in the knee according to age. J Belge de)Tj
T*
(Radiologie 1997;80:17-20.)Tj
-2.175 -1.25 Td
[(15.)-875 (Mahlbauer R, Lukasz )17.7 (TS, Faber )17.7 (TS, Stammber)17.8 (ger )17.7 (T)74 (, Eckstein F)79.8 (.)]TJ
2.175 -1.25 Td
(Comparison of knee joint cartilage thickness in triathletes and)Tj
T*
(physically inactive volunteers based on magnetic resonance)Tj
T*
[(imaging and three-dimensional analysis. )54.8 (Am J Sports Med)]TJ
0 Tw T*
(2000;28:541-6.)Tj
ET
Q
Q
q
0 0 612 792 re
W n
BT
0 g
/GS2 gs
/T1_1 8 Tf
120.092 51 Td
(Personal non-commercial use only. The Journal of Rheumatology Copyright\
\251 2002. All rights reserved.)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
/GS2 gs
/T1_2 1 Tf
10 0 0 10 540 17 Tm
( )Tj
0 0.48627 0.77255 rg
/GS2 gs
-7.22298 0 Td
(www.jrheum.org)Tj
0 g
/GS2 gs
-16.72996 0 Td
(Downloaded on March 29, 2024 from )Tj
ET
endstream
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
69 0 obj
<>
endobj
81 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>
endobj
40 0 obj
<>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>
endobj
64 0 obj
<>stream
HdVpTs͋XbHvdI IAg]v4VTE|Խ
|9X
W2> tV}KuP7@W*XZn j
K;N~Xw0!57v8}w.o { 0}cӞtY}ůs_ٚQSjo4
0.kkg|Ɨ卭>ƟMf<=BHԹ[-$h-2,h ,<K}ȕ OBryr-ЅϰVe!j11=`@'a;`{2܅R@{,u{P0nN+Ts~i@ObI{6<dtaIo9OI~s2{C:@:{Ipz/5Nh
R"nF8rJZ'Vfr|̬HJH3Sդ5!NHz1o73:)47/,Xt~gZiҺק?~]fo*p {BZE(ɻK`VH.{RV!GH1{Ū26q&bo[37*e/Y{j*$||37%N%B,w ]2h}q_X02Æɽ=(+3#=2
%(ڕ13:昣Ӄzo)?E8?W3Dͦi㟂)b;oDlSC]wz=j|5GQrEsg4!6#+X"#Aڰ[}\Fɳ#QgΌh=&(
;2^;ISun
}6nX'E18FQ11p; ~.zCGU;+Yӓۘjf՚G&bOfhG$dasI5ܚy:]{Dh `Q
^ߪ;_;ʵjٺd`sb3rTS+r95֙sXE9+QvJ)IZQWЬnىyoIC@s_kGTZk~f1~k3X*,Ϯ'J(_f8[+c; ($ Qzڎ-7EV5\|͛`U:Vc$@:2G<نiӼ(J=y3װ
d9^m3e\Rֆ P;{yF
xy16DLpumdʫXɵļ};T?䒬Oa|W!^8ۏіl hڜJB\鼬`kfd
qٍJZi>fq괇p~ƹjbҴ"3Zhw7
.[<#|KkZi%^_P/L\A[{3Ƙ3hM@OW= qڮ5x,&WB@<~#5+}iNʦi=~sK-,z<{;asW&}1?!zѳݛm}'r(.wwq܁牼eI@V/9b((E
1%*Աm1c4n!fLF5i:5qNې6/B.SG<