Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow Jrheum on BlueSky
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
ProceedingsPoster Presentations
Open Access

How Often does Follow up 18F-FDG PET/ct Improve or Become Inactive in Patients with Active Large Vessel-Giant Cell Arteritis (LV-GCA) After Escalating Treatment: A Systematic Review

JoAnn Thai, Ashley Yip, Joanne Homik, Ben Vandermeer, Janice Y. Kung, Jan Cohen Tervaert and Alison Clifford
The Journal of Rheumatology August 2026, 53 (Suppl 1) 112; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2026-0447.125
JoAnn Thai
University of Alberta, Edmonton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ashley Yip
University of British Columbia, Department of Medicine, Vancouver
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joanne Homik
University of Alberta, Edmonton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ben Vandermeer
University of Alberta, Edmonton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janice Y. Kung
University of Alberta, Edmonton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jan Cohen Tervaert
University of Alberta, Edmonton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alison Clifford
University of Alberta, Edmonton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Previous
Loading

Abstract

Objectives Biomarkers that correlate with clinical disease activity are greatly needed in giant cell arteritis (GCA), particularly for patients with large vessel vasculitis (LVV) and those receiving tocilizumab (TCZ.). We performed an updated systematic review to determine (1) how often does vascular uptake on FDG PET/CT improve or (2) become inactive in patients with large vessel GCA (LV-GCA) who clinically improve after escalating treatment.

Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception through February 29, 2024. Full text longitudinal studies were included if they: described a minimum of 2 patients with active LV-GCA on baseline PET, and the results of follow up PET scan done ≥ 3 months after escalating immunosuppression, along with an assessment of clinical disease activity. Two reviewers independently performed screening, full text review and data collection, and assessment of study quality using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Studies-2 (QUADAS-2).[1]

Results 3131 unique references were screened, of which 25 studies were included (7 prospective, 18 retrospective), describing 377 patients with GCA. Mean patient age was 70.2 years (±5.4 yrs) and 72% were women. In 24 (96%) studies, patients received glucocorticoids, and in 10 studies (40%) tocilizumab was added. Patients underwent an average of 2.3 PET scans, at mean 9.2 ±5 months apart. An assessment of both clinical disease activity and follow up PET in comparison to baseline results (improved/not improved) was available for 158 LV-GCA patients. Overall, vascular FDG uptake improved on follow up PET in 122/149 (82%) patients who clinically improved with treatment. In the 62 patients who received TCZ, follow up PET improved in 100%. In the 9 patients without clinical improvement, none (0%) had radiographic improvement on repeat PET. In 283 patients with LV-GCA, baseline and follow up PET scans were reported as either still active or inactive. Ultimately, follow up PET became inactive in 119 of 254 patients (47%) who entered clinical remission on treatment. Among the 29 patients who remained clinically active, PET became inactive in 3 (10%). In the TCZ-treated patients, follow up PET became inactive in 76/112 patients (68%) in clinical remission, and remained radiographically active in 6/6 (100%) who remained clinically active.

Conclusion Vascular FDG uptake on follow up PET improved in most (>80%) patients with LV- GCA patients who clinically improved on treatment but ultimately became radiographically- inactive in fewer than half (47%.) Follow up scans improved (100%) and became inactive (68%) more often in TCZ-treated patients.

References [1.] Whiting PF. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:529-36.

  • Copyright © 2026 by the Journal of Rheumatology

This is an Open Access article, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction, without modification, provided the original article is correctly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology: 53 (Suppl 1)
The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 53, Issue Suppl 1
1 Aug 2026
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How Often does Follow up 18F-FDG PET/ct Improve or Become Inactive in Patients with Active Large Vessel-Giant Cell Arteritis (LV-GCA) After Escalating Treatment: A Systematic Review
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
How Often does Follow up 18F-FDG PET/ct Improve or Become Inactive in Patients with Active Large Vessel-Giant Cell Arteritis (LV-GCA) After Escalating Treatment: A Systematic Review
JoAnn Thai, Ashley Yip, Joanne Homik, Ben Vandermeer, Janice Y. Kung, Jan Cohen Tervaert, Alison Clifford
The Journal of Rheumatology Aug 2026, 53 (Suppl 1) 112; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2026-0447.125

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
How Often does Follow up 18F-FDG PET/ct Improve or Become Inactive in Patients with Active Large Vessel-Giant Cell Arteritis (LV-GCA) After Escalating Treatment: A Systematic Review
JoAnn Thai, Ashley Yip, Joanne Homik, Ben Vandermeer, Janice Y. Kung, Jan Cohen Tervaert, Alison Clifford
The Journal of Rheumatology Aug 2026, 53 (Suppl 1) 112; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2026-0447.125
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo  logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  •  logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Identifying Clinical Endophenotypes in Childhood-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Using Unsupervised Machine Learning
  • Granuloma Annulare as a Mimic for Rheumatoid Nodules: A Diagnostic Challenge
  • The Cost-Effectiveness of Early Versus Delayed Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs for Psoriatic Arthritis
Show more Poster Presentations

Similar Articles

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2025 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire