Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow Jrheum on BlueSky
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
ProceedingsPoster Presentations
Open Access

Patient Perspectives on the Environmental Impact of their Advanced Therapy Injection Device

Jill Hall and Steven Katz
The Journal of Rheumatology August 2026, 53 (Suppl 1) 110; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2026-0447.121
Jill Hall
University of Alberta, Edmonton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven Katz
Queen’s University, Kingston
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Previous
Loading

Abstract

Objectives Data demonstrates there is a significant environmental impact using medications requiring injection, including the injecting device and needle. Rheumatology patient perspectives on this impact have not been previously explored. As part of a larger study, we aim to report individual behaviors and perspectives on disposal of rheumatology advanced therapy devices.

Methods In the first half of 2025, a survey on patient perceptions about patient support programs was made available in the waiting room at 3 rheumatology centers in Edmonton, Alberta, and was also electronically shared with those using a patient portal at 1 center. A portion of the survey focused on how patients dispose of their syringe/autoinjector, and their interest in recycling their device if that option were available to them.

Results Of 580 respondents, 265 currently using an injecting device provided responses about their preferences on this topic. 172 dispose of their device in a sharp’s container, 66 return it to their pharmacy, and 27 dispose in their garbage at home. Men more often than women disposed of their devices in the garbage at home, with no differences noted based on age, income, or whether they lived in an urban or rural community. 332 responded with their preferences to recycle their device: 17% definitely would, 27% probably would, 21% might, 27% probably would not, and 8% definitely would not. Patients older than 65 were less likely to be in favor of recycling compared to those younger than 65. How individuals disposed of their devices was not statistically associated with their opinions on recycling.

Conclusion The majority of rheumatology patients using an advanced therapy are disposing of their injecting device appropriately, although there appears to be room for improved education for some. As a majority of those surveyed would be interested in recycling their device as an alternative option, this may present a unique opportunity for the healthcare industry to invest in this service for patients, simultaneously lessening the environmental impact of these devices.

  • Copyright © 2026 by the Journal of Rheumatology

This is an Open Access article, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction, without modification, provided the original article is correctly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology: 53 (Suppl 1)
The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 53, Issue Suppl 1
1 Aug 2026
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patient Perspectives on the Environmental Impact of their Advanced Therapy Injection Device
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Patient Perspectives on the Environmental Impact of their Advanced Therapy Injection Device
Jill Hall, Steven Katz
The Journal of Rheumatology Aug 2026, 53 (Suppl 1) 110; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2026-0447.121

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Patient Perspectives on the Environmental Impact of their Advanced Therapy Injection Device
Jill Hall, Steven Katz
The Journal of Rheumatology Aug 2026, 53 (Suppl 1) 110; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2026-0447.121
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo  logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  •  logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • IgG4-Related Skin Disease in a 9-Year-Old Patient: Remission Under Mycophenolate Mofetil After Rituximab Failure
  • Clinical Relevance of Pelvic and Heel Enthesophytes in Psoriatic Arthritis
  • Addressing Symptoms of Burnout Among Pediatric Rheumatology Fellows: A Quality Improvement Project
Show more Poster Presentations

Similar Articles

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2025 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire