Abstract
Objectives Osteoarthritis is the most common form of arthritis, and its prevalence is increasing. As a non-inflammatory type of arthritis, it can be managed in the primary care setting with nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs, physical and occupational therapy, self-efficacy programs, and orthopedic referral for injections or surgery. At the University of Vermont Health Network, only 1 in 4 patients seen for joint pain have inflammatory arthritis,[1] and our wait time for new patients is 9 months. To address unnecessary referrals to rheumatology, we developed and evaluated an educational tool for differentiating non-inflammatory arthritis from inflammatory arthritis to improve provider comfort with managing osteoarthritis.
Methods We conducted a chart review of adult patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis (n=390) at the University of Vermont Medical Center rheumatology clinic between 2020 and 2022 to gather data on referral patterns and outcomes. We used a pilot survey to assess primary care provider baseline comfort with diagnosing and treating osteoarthritis, which informed the creation of a two-page educational tool. The tool was introduced with a brief education session to primary care providers at 27 of 28 clinics in the network. The utility and impact of the tool was assessed with pre- (n=94) and post-intervention (n=32) surveys at 2 months.
Results Osteoarthritis was diagnosed at the first visit in 390 patients referred to rheumatology for joint pain, accounting for 9% of all new patient referrals. Only 5% of these patients were seen again in rheumatology clinic and only 3% were found to have an inflammatory disease as a primary or concurrent diagnosis. Prior to the introduction of the tool, clinicians were least comfortable with knowing when to refer to rheumatology and most comfortable with diagnosing osteoarthritis. Post-intervention survey data indicated improvement in overall comfort with managing osteoarthritis (8% improvement, p=0.04) and knowing when to refer to orthopedics (10%, p=0.04). Half of clinicians (50%) reported using the tool in their practice, 63% described value in using the tool in medical education, and 43% in shared decision making. After using the tool, 34% anticipate a reduction in referrals to rheumatology and 9% have already referred fewer patients to rheumatology.
Conclusion We developed and distributed an educational tool to primary care providers. Pre- and post-intervention surveys indicate that this was an effective approach for improving PCP comfort in the diagnosis and management of non-inflammatory joint pain with anticipation of fewer referrals to rheumatology resulting in improved access to care. [1.] Thoms BL. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2023;7(3):rkad067.
- Copyright © 2025 by the Journal of Rheumatology
This is an Open Access article, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction, without modification, provided the original article is correctly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.






