Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow Jrheum on BlueSky
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleOsteoarthritis

Association of Knee Osteoarthritis and Flexion Contracture With Localized Tibial Articular Cartilage Loss: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative

T. Mark Campbell, Odette Laneuville and Guy Trudel
The Journal of Rheumatology March 2024, 51 (3) 285-290; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2023-0743
T. Mark Campbell
1T.M. Campbell, MD, MSc, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Elisabeth Bruyère Hospital, and Bone and Joint Research Laboratory, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, and Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, and Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Ottawa Hospital;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for T. Mark Campbell
  • For correspondence: tcampbell{at}bruyere.org
Odette Laneuville
2O. Laneuville, PhD, Bone and Joint Research Laboratory, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, and Department of Biology, University of Ottawa;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guy Trudel
3G. Trudel, MD, MSc, Bone and Joint Research Laboratory, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, and Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, and Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
PreviousNext
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Participant demographics.

    All
    Participants,
    n = 578
    Participants With
    Contracture,
    n = 190
    Participants With
    No Contracture,
    n = 388
    Age, yrs61.6 (8.9)62.3 (9.2)61.2 (8.8)
    Female sex, %59.753.2*62.9
    BMI, kg/m230.7 (4.7)31.1 (4.8)30.6 (4.7)
    KL grade2.2 (0.7)2.3 (0.7)2.2 (0.6)
    Maximum knee extensiona, degrees0.2 (3.9)−4.4 (2.7)*1.8 (2.7)
    Knee alignmentb, degrees−0.4 (3.7)−0.2 (3.6)−0.6 (3.8)
    WOMAC pain2.3 (3.1)2.9 (3.3)*2.1 (3.0)
    WOMAC function8.5 (10.6)10.9 (11.7)*7.3 (9.8)
    WOMAC stiffness1.5 (1.5)1.8 (1.6)*1.4 (1.5)
    WOMAC total12.4 (14.5)15.6 (16.0)*10.8 (13.5)
    • Values are mean (SD) unless otherwise indicated.

    • ↵a Negative value indicates degrees lacking from full extension.

    • ↵b Valgus has a negative value.

    • ↵* P < 0.05 for the contracture group vs no contracture group. KL: Kellgren-Lawrence; WOMAC: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Cartilage thickness and percent of denuded bone for all participants.

    Outcome, n = 578Baseline
    (95% CI)
    Yr 1
    (95% CI)
    Mean Change Over 1 Yr
    (95% CI)
    Medial tibia
          Cartilage thickness, mm
              Overall1.63 (1.60 to 1.65)1.61 (1.59 to 1.63)−0.01 (−0.02 to −0.01)*
              Center2.08 (2.01 to 2.12)2.05 (2.01 to 2.08)−0.03 (−0.04 to −0.02)*
              Anterior1.45 (1.43 to 1.48)1.45 (1.42 to 1.47)−0.00 (−0.01 to 0.00)
              Posterior1.40 (1.38 to 1.42)1.40 (1.38 to 1.42)−0.00 (−0.01 to 0.00)
          Denuded bone, %
              Overall1.41 (1.08 to 1.73)1.86 (1.47 to 2.24)0.45 (0.29 to 0.62)*
              Center0.52 (0.28 to 0.76)0.92 (0.54 to 1.30)0.40 (0.19 to 0.61)*
              Anterior0.87 (0.40 to 1.34)1.06 (0.60 to 1.53)0.19 (0.04 to 0.35)*
              Posterior0.81 (0.47 to 1.15)0.85 (0.53 to 1.18)0.04 (−0.05 to 0.13)
    Lateral tibia
          Cartilage thickness, mm
              Overall1.96 (1.93 to 1.99)1.95 (1.92 to 1.98)−0.01 (−0.02 to −0.01)*
              Center2.97 (2.91 to 3.03)2.96 (2.90 to 3.02)−0.01 (−0.03 to 0.00)*
              Anterior1.64 (1.61 to 1.67)1.64 (1.62 to 1.67)0.00 (−0.00 to 0.01)
              Posterior1.64 (1.61 to 1.67)1.63 (1.60 to 1.66)−0.01 (−0.02 to −0.01)*
          Denuded bone, %
              Overall1.00 (0.74 to 1.26)1.07 (0.79 to 1.34)0.07 (0.01 to 0.12)*
              Center0.17 (0.05 to 0.29)0.23 (0.05 to 0.42)0.07 (−0.01 to 0.14)
              Anterior0.95 (0.44 to 1.46)0.94 (0.43 to 1.46)0.01 (−0.11 to 0.09)
              Posterior2.97 (2.24 to 3.70)3.16 (2.39 to 3.92)0.19 (0.06 to 0.32)*
    • Values in bold are statistically significant.

    • ↵* P < 0.05 for mean change difference from baseline to year 1.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    ANOVA results for contracture interaction with year 1 timepoint.

    Outcome, n = 578Baseline, mean (SD)Yr 1, mean (SD)Effect Size, β (95% CI)Pa
    Medial tibia
          Cartilage thickness, mm
              Overall
                    Contracture1.65 (0.29)1.64 (0.30)0.003 (−0.01 to 0.01)0.60
                    No contracture1.61 (0.27)1.60 (0.27)
              Center
                    Contracture2.12 (0.47)2.07 (0.49)−0.01 (−0.03 to 0.02)0.57
                    No contracture2.06 (0.43)2.03 (0.43)
              Anterior
                    Contracture1.48 (0.29)1.48 (0.29)0.004 (−0.01 to 0.02)0.59
                    No contracture1.44 (0.29)1.43 (0.29)
              Posterior
                    Contracture1.43 (0.28)*1.44 (0.28)0.01 (0.002 to 0.03)0.02
                    No contracture1.38 (0.26)1.38 (0.26)
          Denuded bone, %
              Overall
                    Contracture1.55 (3.87)2.23 (5.05)0.19 (−0.17 to 0.54)0.30
                    No contracture1.33 (4.06)1.68 (4.56)
              Center
                    Contracture0.55 (2.88)1.31 (6.32)0.44 (0.02 to 0.86)0.04
                    No contracture0.51 (3.03)0.74 (3.59)
              Anterior
                    Contracture0.62 (3.64)0.73 (3.30)−0.22 (−0.55 to 0.11)0.19
                    No contracture0.99 (6.60)1.22 (6.56)
              Posterior
                    Contracture0.75 (3.30)0.88 (3.46)0.09 (−0.11 to 0.28)0.38
                    No contracture0.84 (4.46)0.84 (4.19)
    Lateral tibia
          Cartilage thickness, mm
              Overall
                    Contracture1.97 (0.36)1.96 (0.37)0.002 (−0.01 to 0.01)0.76
                    No contracture1.95 (0.37)1.94 (0.37)
              Center
                    Contracture3.01 (0.69)3.00 (0.70)0.01 (−0.02 to 0.03)0.70
                    No contracture2.95 (0.71)2.94 (0.72)
              Anterior
                    Contracture1.64 (0.35)1.65 (0.36)0.01 (−0.01 to 0.02)0.68
                    No contracture1.64 (0.30)1.64 (0.30)
              Posterior
                    Contracture1.66 (0.36)1.64 (0.36)−0.002 (−0.02 to 0.01)0.82
                    No Contracture1.63 (0.36)1.62 (0.36)
          Denuded bone, %
                Overall
                    Contracture1.44 (3.92)*1.51 (4.00)*−0.04 (−0.16 to 0.08)0.52
                    No contracture0.78 (2.67)0.85 (3.07)
              Center
                    Contracture0.27 (1.73)0.32 (1.98)−0.08 (−0.21 to 0.04)0.17
                    No contracture0.12 (1.40)0.19 (2.44)
              Anterior
                    Contracture2.11 (10.03)2.21 (10.32)0.20 (−0.03 to 0.42)0.09
                    No contracture0.39 (2.82)0.32 (2.39)
              Posterior
                    Contracture3.61 (9.69)3.71 (9.85)−0.17 (−0.45 to 0.11)0.23
                    No contracture2.65 (8.51)2.88 (9.08)
    Summary of ANOVA Findings for Regional Effect of Contracture
    MedialLateral
    Anterior–↑ % denuded bone (trend)
    Center↑ % denuded bone–
    PosteriorCartilage preservation–
    • Values in bold are statistically significant.

    • ↵a For contracture interaction with year 1 outcome after controlling for baseline outcome and adjusting for the continuous variables age, BMI, WOMAC total score, knee alignment, ordinal variable baseline KL, and the nominal variables sex and race.

    • ↵* P < 0.05 for the contracture group vs no contracture group. KL: Kellgren-Lawrence; WOMAC: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.

Additional Files

  • Tables
  • Data Supplement

    • 2023-0743DataSuppl.pdf
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 51, Issue 3
1 Mar 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Association of Knee Osteoarthritis and Flexion Contracture With Localized Tibial Articular Cartilage Loss: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Association of Knee Osteoarthritis and Flexion Contracture With Localized Tibial Articular Cartilage Loss: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative
T. Mark Campbell, Odette Laneuville, Guy Trudel
The Journal of Rheumatology Mar 2024, 51 (3) 285-290; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2023-0743

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Association of Knee Osteoarthritis and Flexion Contracture With Localized Tibial Articular Cartilage Loss: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative
T. Mark Campbell, Odette Laneuville, Guy Trudel
The Journal of Rheumatology Mar 2024, 51 (3) 285-290; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2023-0743
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo  logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  •  logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
    • DATA AVAILABILITY
    • ONLINE SUPPLEMENT
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Keywords

CARTILAGE
KNEE JOINT
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
OSTEOARTHRITIS
range of motion

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Denosumab for Osteoporosis in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases
  • Association Between Depressive Symptoms and Self-Reported Physical Activity in Persons With Knee Osteoarthritis
  • Osteoarthritis Across Joint Sites in the Million Veteran Program Cohort: Insights From Electronic Health Records and Military Service History
Show more Osteoarthritis

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • CARTILAGE
  • knee joint
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • osteoarthritis
  • range of motion

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2025 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire