Effect of Online Training on the Reliability of Assessing Sacroiliac Joint Radiographs in Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Randomized, Controlled Study

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Rudwaleit M,
   2. van der Heijde D,
   3. Landewé R, et al.

   The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:777-83.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Sieper J,
   2. Rudwaleit M,
   3. Baraliakos X, et al.

   The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68 Suppl 2:ii1-44.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Boel A,
   2. Molto A,
   3. van der Heijde D, et al.

   Do patients with axial spondyloarthritis with radiographic sacroiliitis fulfil both the modified New York criteria and the ASAS axial spondyloarthritis criteria? Results from eight cohorts. Ann Rheum Dis 2019; 78:1545-9.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. van der Linden S,
   2. Valkenburg HA,
   3. Cats A.

   Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum 1984;27:361-8.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. van den Berg R,
   2. Lenczner G,
   3. Feydy A, et al.

   Agreement between clinical practice and trained central reading in reading of sacroiliac joints on plain pelvic radiographs. Results from the DESIR cohort. Arthritis Rheumatol 2014;66:2403-11.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
6. 6.
   1. Christiansen AA,
   2. Hendricks O,
   3. Kuettel D, et al.

   Limited reliability of radiographic assessment of sacroiliac joints in patients with suspected early spondyloarthritis. J Rheumatol 2017;44:70-7.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Protopopov M,
   2. Sieper J,
   3. Haibel H,
   4. Listing J,
   5. Rudwaleit M,
   6. Poddubnyy D.

   Relevance of structural damage in the sacroiliac joints for the functional status and spinal mobility in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from the German Spondyloarthritis Inception Cohort. Arthritis Res Ther 2017;19:240.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. van Tubergen A,
   2. Heuft-Dorenbosch L,
   3. Schulpen G, et al.

   Radiographic assessment of sacroiliitis by radiologists and rheumatologists: does training improve quality? Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62:519-25.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Feldtkeller E,
   2. Erlendsson J.

   Definition of disease duration in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int 2008;28:693-6.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Salvadorini G,
    2. Bandinelli F,
    3. Delle Sedie A, et al.

    Ankylosing spondylitis: how diagnostic and therapeutic delay have changed over the last six decades. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2012;30:561-5.

    OpenUrlPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Kellgren JH.

    Atlas of standard radiographs in arthritis. In: The epidemiology of chronic rheumatism, volume 2. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1963.
12. 12.↵
    1. Chang EY,
    2. Chen KC,
    3. Huang BK,
    4. Kavanaugh A.

    Adult inflammatory arthritides: what the radiologist should know. Radiographics 2016;36:1849-70.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Ørnbjerg LM,
    2. Brahe CH,
    3. Askling J, et al.

    Treatment response and drug retention rates in 24,195 biologic-naïve patients with axial spondyloarthritis initiating TNFi treatment: routine care data from 12 registries in the EuroSpA collaboration. Ann Rheum Dis 2019;78:1536-44.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Bennett PH,
    2. Wood PHN

    , editors. Population studies of the rheumatic diseases: proceedings of the third international symposium. New York: Excerpta Medica Foundation; 1966.
15. 15.↵
    1. Ćwiek-Kupczyńska H,
    2. Filipiak K,
    3. Markiewicz A, et al.

    Semantic concept schema of the linear mixed model of experimental observations. Sci Data 2020;7:70.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed