Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
EditorialEditorial

Importance of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Antibodies and B Cell Reconstitution to Optimize the Prevention Strategy of COVID-19

Marion Thomas and Jérôme Avouac
The Journal of Rheumatology March 2023, 50 (3) 304-306; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.221282
Marion Thomas
1M. Thomas, MD, J. Avouac, MD, PhD, Service de Rhumatologie, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP. Centre - Université Paris Cité, 75014, Paris, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marion Thomas
Jérôme Avouac
1M. Thomas, MD, J. Avouac, MD, PhD, Service de Rhumatologie, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP. Centre - Université Paris Cité, 75014, Paris, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jérôme Avouac
  • For correspondence: jerome.avouac@aphp.fr
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Several lines of evidence have shown that rituximab (RTX)-treated patients are at high risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).1 Thus, health authorities have considered patients receiving RTX as extremely high priority for anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. However, a major issue relates to the high risk of reduced vaccination efficacy in these patients.2 Indeed, a metaanalysis conducted in 2021 showed an overall low rate of humoral response of 0.40 (95% CI 0.35-0.47) after a predominantly 2-dose vaccination course. Moreover, humoral response was highly heterogeneous in the 23 included studies, with a rate of responders ranging from 0 to approximately 80%.3 These results must be put in perspective with the probable conservation of a functional T cell response in RTX-treated patients. However, further work is warranted to determine the clinical protection granted by a functionally active T cell response.4

Given the heterogeneity of antibody response, patients with a treatment history of RTX therapy should be individually assessed for a personalized vaccination strategy against SARS-CoV-2. To that end, it is crucial to identify factors associated with response to vaccination. Three main factors have been identified. First, B cell reconstitution has a critical role in influencing the response to the vaccine. The degree of B cell recovery has been shown to correlate with the extent of SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody levels, suggesting the development of humoral immune response once peripheral B cells are repopulated.2 Second, the time from last RTX infusion needs to be considered, with a longer time allowing an increased chance of B cell repopulation. Finally, concomitant treatment with methotrexate may further decrease the possibility of seroconversion.5-7

The majority of these data were obtained from patients after 2 doses of the vaccine, whereas booster doses of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have since emerged as an important strategy for containing the pandemic. The majority of patients have now received 3 to 4 doses of vaccine, and a fifth dose may even be discussed in severely immunocompromised patients. However, there is still a paucity of data regarding factors associated with a serologic response to COVID-19 vaccine boosters in RTX-treated patients who were initially seronegative.

In this issue of The Journal of Rheumatology, Schultz et al assessed in a retrospective study factors associated with humoral response to the COVID-19 booster vaccine in patients with autoimmune rheumatic disease treated with RTX who were previously serologically unresponsive to the initial vaccine series.8 Among the 31 included patients, 68% seroconverted following a booster of the COVID-19 vaccine. This percentage of positive serological response was higher than those observed in previous series, including the largest of 62 patients, in which only 9 (14.5%) patients seroconverted following a third dose.9-11 Several factors may at least partly explain these discrepancies, including a population that had a majority of patients being treated for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis, whereas most other studies had a majority of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The standard treatment for RA often includes the concomitant use of methotrexate, whereas ANCA-associated vasculitis does not. Therefore, these results may be less affected by this confounding variable than those of other studies. The extent of B cell reconstitution and time from last RTX may also account for these differences, but, unfortunately, these parameters were often not measured or discussed in the different studies.

In the study of Schultz et al,8 the higher percentage of patients who were able to seroconvert after a booster dose allowed for more accurate associations than what other studies have been able to accomplish with their low numbers of seroconverted patients. The authors confirmed that detectable B cells and time from last RTX exposure > 6 months were also strongly associated with a positive response following a booster vaccine. Interestingly, demographic characteristics, corticosteroid use, and RTX dosage were not associated with seroconversion. This is consistent with results from previous studies that also showed that gammaglobulin levels or cumulative RTX dose did not influence antibody response.2 Altogether, these results strongly support including the assessment of B cell reconstitution and SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies into clinical decisions on timing of booster doses in RTX-treated patients, although it is still not currently incorporated into European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology or American College of Rheumatology guidelines (Figure). In seronegative patients with detectable B cells, a booster dose of the vaccine should be administered, given the higher chances of seroconversion. In seronegative patients with undetectable B cells, 2 strategies may be considered. The first would be to postpone RTX therapy to improve immunogenicity, if the last RTX infusion was ≥ 6 months and in cases of stable and quiescent disease. This approach still needs to be formally demonstrated and may increase the risk of disease flare and/or progression. The second would be to apply a preexposure prophylaxis with anti–SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies. The monoclonal antibody combination tixagevimab/cilgavimab consists of 2 Fc-modified fully human monoclonal antibodies administered by intramuscular injection. It has been shown to be effective for the prevention of COVID-19 in patients with moderate-to-severe immunodeficiency who are unlikely to mount an adequate immune response to COVID-19 vaccination.12 The first real-world experience in 412 patients undergoing B cell–depleting therapies for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases who received tixagevimab/cilgavimab as a preexposure prophylaxis was encouraging, as it revealed that of 12 breakthrough infections, disease was mild in 11, with only a single patient experiencing severe disease.13 A low rate of infections and severe illnesses has also been observed among 1112 severely immunocompromised patients, including those treated with RTX, treated with tixagevimab/cilgavimab.14

Figure.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure.

Algorithm integrating SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies and B cell reconstitution to optimize the prevention strategy of COVID-19. * 3 to 6 months following the last dose of vaccine. ** Considered as protective level.16 *** Hold RTX for at least 2 weeks after vaccination if disease activity allows (ACR guidelines17). **** In case of stable and quiescent disease. ACR: American College of Rheumatology; BAU: binding antibody unit; COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019; RTX: rituximab.

It is becoming more and more evident that multiple strategies including vaccination and monoclonal antibodies are required to prevent COVID-19 in immunosuppressed patients. Several questions are still pending and will need to be considered. The course of antibody titers following vaccination in RTX-treated patients needs to be precise because it may influence the time of vaccine booster. The optimal antibody level required to protect patients from severe clinical outcomes according to the type of variant, as well as the involvement of T cell response in vaccination efficacy, have not been clearly identified. The incidence and severity of breakthrough infection in vaccinated patients treated with RTX is also largely unknown. The combined effects of vaccination and natural immunity following infection have also been scarcely studied, as patients with a history of symptomatic COVID-19 are usually excluded from studies related to vaccination and anti-N antibody testing is not routinely performed in all centers. A first clinical experience showed increased antibody response in RTX-treated patients following a symptomatic COVID-19 infection.15 Finally, in patients receiving monoclonal antibodies, the efficacy may largely vary according to the variants, and the optimal dose and timing of reinjection are not firmly established.

Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 has been a major step forward to protect immunocompromised patients from severe clinical outcomes. We are now at a crossroads, with an epidemic whose contagiousness and severity have become disparate due to the different variants that can modify sensitivity to vaccines. To contain the pandemic, selecting the correct vaccine and defining the precise timing of booster vaccinations are now the challenge of the next months.

Footnotes

  • JA has received honoraria from AstraZeneca. MT declares no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

  • See COVID-19 boosters and rituximab, page 420

  • Copyright © 2023 by the Journal of Rheumatology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Avouac J,
    2. Drumez E,
    3. Hachulla E, et al
    . COVID-19 outcomes in patients with inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases treated with rituximab: a cohort study. Lancet Rheumatol 2021;3:e419-e26.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Avouac J,
    2. Miceli-Richard C,
    3. Combier A, et al
    . Risk factors of impaired humoral response to COVID-19 vaccination in rituximab-treated patients. Rheumatology 2022;61:SI163-8.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Schietzel S,
    2. Anderegg M,
    3. Limacher A, et al
    . Humoral and cellular immune responses on SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with anti-CD20 therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1342 patients. RMD Open 2022;8:e002036.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Bitoun S,
    2. Henry J,
    3. Desjardins D, et al
    . Rituximab impairs B cell response but not T cell response to COVID-19 vaccine in autoimmune diseases. Arthritis Rheumatol 2022;74:927-33.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Habermann E,
    2. Gieselmann L,
    3. Tober-Lau P, et al
    . Pausing methotrexate prevents impairment of Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 neutralisation after COVID-19 booster vaccination. RMD Open 2022;8:e002639.
  6. 6.
    1. Stahl D,
    2. Tho Pesch C,
    3. Brück C, et al
    . Reduced humoral response to a third dose (booster) of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines by concomitant methotrexate therapy in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis. RMD Open 2022;8:e002632.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Medeiros-Ribeiro AC,
    2. Aikawa NE
    . Discontinuing methotrexate to enhance vaccine response. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2022;18:497-8.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Schultz K,
    2. Jannat-Khah D,
    3. Spiera R
    . B cell reconstitution is associated with COVID-19 booster vaccine responsiveness in patients previously seronegative treated with rituximab. J Rheumatol 2023;50:420-5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Bitoun S,
    2. Avouac J,
    3. Henry J, et al
    . Very low rate of humoral response after a third COVID-19 vaccine dose in patients with autoimmune diseases treated with rituximab and non-responders to two doses. RMD Open 2022;8:e002308.
  10. 10.
    1. Bonelli M,
    2. Mrak D,
    3. Tobudic S, et al
    . Additional heterologous versus homologous booster vaccination in immunosuppressed patients without SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroconversion after primary mRNA vaccination: a randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2022;81:687-94.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Jyssum I,
    2. Kared H,
    3. Tran TT, et al
    . Humoral and cellular immune responses to two and three doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in rituximab-treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective, cohort study. Lancet Rheumatol 2022;4:e177-87.
  12. 12.↵
    1. Levin MJ,
    2. Ustianowski A,
    3. De Wit S, et al; PROVENT Study Group
    . Intramuscular AZD7442 (tixagevimab-cilgavimab) for prevention of Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2022;386:2188-200.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Calabrese C,
    2. Kirchner E,
    3. Villa-Forte A, et al
    . Early experience with tixagevimab/cilgavimab pre-exposure prophylaxis in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disease undergoing B cell depleting therapy and those with inborn errors of humoral immunity. RMD Open 2022;8:e002557.
  14. 14.↵
    1. Nguyen Y,
    2. Flahault A,
    3. Chavarot N, et al; AP-HP-Centre Monoclonal Antibodies Working Group
    . Pre-exposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab and cilgavimab (Evusheld) for COVID-19 among 1112 severely immunocompromised patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 2022;28:1654.e1-4.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Avouac J,
    2. Ghossan R,
    3. Al Tabaa O, et al
    . Increased antibody response after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-based vaccination in rituximab-treated patients with previous COVID-19 infection. Rheumatology 2022;61:SI191-3.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Feng S,
    2. Phillips DJ,
    3. White T, et al; Oxford COVID Vaccine Trial Group
    . Correlates of protection against symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat Medicine 2021; 27:2032-40.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Curtis JR,
    2. Johnson SR,
    3. Anthony DD, et al
    . American College of Rheumatology guidance for COVID-19 vaccination in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: version 4. Arthritis Rheumatol 2022;74:e21-36.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 50, Issue 3
1 Mar 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Importance of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Antibodies and B Cell Reconstitution to Optimize the Prevention Strategy of COVID-19
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Importance of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Antibodies and B Cell Reconstitution to Optimize the Prevention Strategy of COVID-19
Marion Thomas, Jérôme Avouac
The Journal of Rheumatology Mar 2023, 50 (3) 304-306; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.221282

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Importance of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Antibodies and B Cell Reconstitution to Optimize the Prevention Strategy of COVID-19
Marion Thomas, Jérôme Avouac
The Journal of Rheumatology Mar 2023, 50 (3) 304-306; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.221282
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • From Prediction Tools to Precision Medicine in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody–Associated Vasculitis
  • Optimizing Care for Pregnancy in Rheumatic Diseases: Barriers and Potential Solutions
  • High Frequency of Foot Insufficiency Fractures in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases Referred for Magnetic Resonance Imaging: What Is the Clinical Relevance?
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire