Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow Jrheum on BlueSky
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleSystemic Lupus Erythematosus

Variations of C3 and C4 Before and During Pregnancy in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Association With Disease Flares and Obstetric Outcomes

Francesca Crisafulli, Laura Andreoli, Dina Zucchi, Rossella Reggia, Maria C. Gerardi, Daniele Lini, Chiara Tani, Sonia Zatti, Franco Franceschini, Marta Mosca and Angela Tincani
The Journal of Rheumatology October 2023, 50 (10) 1296-1301; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2022-1135
Francesca Crisafulli
1F. Crisafulli, MD, L. Andreoli, MD, D. Lini, MD, F. Franceschini, MD, A. Tincani, MD, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Francesca Crisafulli
  • For correspondence: crisafulli.francesca10{at}gmail.com
Laura Andreoli
1F. Crisafulli, MD, L. Andreoli, MD, D. Lini, MD, F. Franceschini, MD, A. Tincani, MD, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Laura Andreoli
Dina Zucchi
2D. Zucchi, MD, C. Tani, MD, M. Mosca, MD, Rheumatology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dina Zucchi
Rossella Reggia
3R. Reggia, MD, Internal Medicine, Casa di Cura San Camillo, Cremona;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria C. Gerardi
4M.C. Gerardi, MD, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, and Rheumatology Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniele Lini
1F. Crisafulli, MD, L. Andreoli, MD, D. Lini, MD, F. Franceschini, MD, A. Tincani, MD, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chiara Tani
2D. Zucchi, MD, C. Tani, MD, M. Mosca, MD, Rheumatology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sonia Zatti
5S. Zatti, MD, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Spedali Civili and University of Brescia, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Franco Franceschini
1F. Crisafulli, MD, L. Andreoli, MD, D. Lini, MD, F. Franceschini, MD, A. Tincani, MD, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marta Mosca
2D. Zucchi, MD, C. Tani, MD, M. Mosca, MD, Rheumatology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angela Tincani
1F. Crisafulli, MD, L. Andreoli, MD, D. Lini, MD, F. Franceschini, MD, A. Tincani, MD, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

Objective To analyze complement level variations in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) pregnancies, focusing on disease flares and obstetric complications.

Methods SLE pregnancies prospectively followed by multidisciplinary teams from 1987 to 2018 in 2 Italian rheumatology centers were retrospectively analyzed. As reference, pregnancy-modified ranges of normal levels of C3 and C4 were derived from 175 pregnancies from the general obstetric population (GOP), as previously described by our group.

Results Two hundred forty-six pregnancies in 172 patients with SLE were analyzed. Eighty-nine percent were live births. Thirty-five flares were recorded in 30 pregnancies (12.2%) and obstetric complications occurred in 47 pregnancies (19.1%) including 27 pregnancy losses, 11 severely preterm births (2 resulting in perinatal death), and 15 hypertensive disorders. C3 and C4 levels were higher in the GOP than in patients with SLE, at any time point. C3 and C4 levels progressively increased during pregnancy in both GOP and SLE pregnancies without flare and obstetric complications, whereas this physiological increase was not observed in pregnancies with flares or obstetric complications. A significantly higher frequency of low C4 was found in pregnancies with flares (at preconception and in each trimester) and preterm births (at preconception). In multivariate analysis, low C4 at preconception was associated with flares (odds ratio 13.81, 95% CI 3.10-61.43, P < 0.001).

Conclusion Low C4 at preconception was found to be an independent risk factor for SLE flare during pregnancy. Not only C3 and C4 levels but also their variations should be observed, as their failure to increase can be useful to predict risk of complications and suggest closer monitoring.

Key Indexing Terms:
  • complement C3
  • complement C4
  • pregnancy
  • systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease affecting mainly women of childbearing age. Although pregnancy outcomes in patients with SLE can be improved by correct planning and multidisciplinary management, these patients are still affected by a higher risk of maternal and fetal complications as compared to the general obstetric population (GOP).1-4 History of lupus nephritis, positivity for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), poor disease control before conception, and flares during pregnancy are known risk factors for pregnancy complications.5 There is a need for additional variables for a more sensitive preconception risk stratification, particularly biomarkers predicting obstetric complications.

The complement system has a crucial role during physiological pregnancy, promoting changes at the fetal–maternal interface.6 In the GOP, C3 and C4 serum levels progressively increase during pregnancy.7 Complement consumption, leading to a smaller increase of complement levels, can contribute to adverse pregnancy outcomes.6,8-10 The utility of serum complement levels in monitoring disease activity in patients with SLE is well-established, but information on conventional serum C3 and C4 levels in the assessment of SLE flares during pregnancy is still limited and controversial.6,11,12 Moreover, there are conflicting results about the role of complement as a predictor of obstetric complications in SLE pregnancies.4,13,14 In the Predictors of Pregnancy Outcome: Biomarkers in Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome and SLE (PROMISSE) prospective study of pregnancies in women with SLE and/or aPL positivity, a smaller increase of C3 during pregnancy and the increase of complement activation products early in pregnancy predicted adverse pregnancy outcomes.10,14

The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the association between complement levels in the preconception period and during pregnancy, and the occurrence of flares and obstetric complications by analyzing 2 historical cohorts of prospectively followed pregnancies in patients with SLE at 2 multidisciplinary pregnancy clinics.

METHODS

Study design and patient population. Data from prospectively followed SLE pregnancies were retrospectively retrieved from 1987 to 2018 at 2 Italian pregnancy clinics, to study C3 and C4 changes during gestation in SLE pregnancies. The study was approved by the local ethics committee (NP 2917).

Complement levels in the GOP, used for comparison, were previously described by our group.7 All the patients fulfilled American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1997 and/or Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics 2012 classification criteria.15,16 Six twin pregnancies were excluded from the analysis.

Data about clinical and laboratory features, including general cardiovascular (CV) risk factors (ie, obesity, cigarette smoking, type 2 diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and arterial hypertension) were collected at a preconception visit (within 6 months before conception) and during each trimester.

Disease activity was evaluated by the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) at preconception and by the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Pregnancy Disease Activity Index (SLEPDAI) during each trimester.17 A disease flare was defined as the onset of new disease features (with a consequent increase in disease activity) and/or worsening of preexisting manifestations resulting in treatment modification.

Obstetric complications were divided in 3 groups: (1) pregnancy losses, including early miscarriage (≤10th gestational week) and late pregnancy loss (>10th gestation week); (2) severely preterm births with delivery before the 34th gestational week; and (3) hypertensive disorders of pregnancy including preeclampsia, HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count) syndrome, and eclampsia.

Statistical analysis. Categorical variables were expressed as numbers and percentages and were compared using the Fisher exact test. Continuous variables were expressed as median (2.5-97.5 percentile range) and were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired measurements.

To identify predictors of SLE flare during pregnancy, multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed by selecting covariates based on the research question (possible role of serum complement levels at preconception visit) and plausible independent variables, which were selected a priori among others clinical variables, such as SLEDAI score during the 6 months prior to conception and hydroxychloroquine treatment during pregnancy. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Patients and pregnancies description. One hundred seventy-two patients with SLE were included. The median year of pregnancy was 2009 (2005-2014). Median age at diagnosis was 23.0 (10.5-35.0) years and at conception was 31.0 (22.0-40.7) years; median disease duration at conception was 7.0 (0.0-23.0) years. Demography, comorbidities, and disease features are reported in Supplementary Table S1 (available with the online version of this article).

Data for 246 pregnancies were analyzed (1 woman had 5 pregnancies, 2 women had 4 pregnancies, 8 women had 3 pregnancies, and 47 women had 2 pregnancies). There were 134 (54.5%) pregnancies in primigravidae patients; 154 (62.6%) pregnancies were planned, 232 (94.3%) were spontaneous, and 14 (5.7%) were achieved with assisted reproductive technology.

Thirty-five flares occurred in 30 pregnancies (12.2%); flares were mild/moderate in 22 cases (73.3%). In 8/30 (26.7%) pregnancies, the flare occurred during the first trimester (3 hematologic, 2 renal, 1 cutaneous, 1 articular, and 1 renal + cutaneous); in 17/29 (58.6%) during the second trimester (5 articular, 3 cutaneous, 3 hematologic, 1 renal, 1 vasculitic, 2 articular + cutaneous, 1 renal + cutaneous, and 1 hematologic + vasculitic); and in 5/28 (17.9%) during the third trimester (2 articular, 1 neurologic, 1 cerebral arterial thrombosis, and 1 macrophage activation syndrome). A higher frequency of severely preterm births was found in pregnancies with flare compared with pregnancies without flare (13.3% vs 3.2%, P = 0.03; Supplementary Table S2, available with the online version of this article). The SLEDAI score in the 6 months before pregnancy was low and similar in both groups (median [2.5-97.5 percentile] 2.0 [0.0-6.0] vs 2.0 [0.0-6.0], P = 0.16; data available in 161 and 18 pregnancies, respectively).

Live births were 219 (89%). Among these, 31 neonates were small for gestational age (SGA; 14.8%, 9 missing data). Forty-seven pregnancies (19.1%) had at least 1 obstetric complication. There were 27 (11%) pregnancy losses; 20 were early miscarriages and 7 were late miscarriages. There were 11 severely preterm births (2 perinatal deaths occurred); in 4 cases, preterm delivery was caused by preeclampsia. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy occurred in 15 pregnancies, all defined as preeclampsia, 4 of which were complicated by HELLP syndrome; no eclampsia was recorded.

As compared with 199 uneventful SLE pregnancies (Supplementary Table S3, available with the online version of this article), the group of 27 pregnancies complicated by fetal loss was more frequently treated with immunosuppressants (63% vs 32.2%, P = 0.004). Eleven pregnancies complicated by severely preterm births had higher frequency of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS; 36.4% vs 9%, P = 0.02) and higher SLEPDAI during pregnancy (first trimester: 4.0 [0.0-6.0] vs 2.0 [0.0-6.0], P = 0.02; second trimester: 4.0 [0.0-13.0] vs 2.0 [0.0-6.0], P = 0.004; and 3rd trimester: 4.0 [2.0-14.0] vs 2.0 [0.0-4.0], P < 0.001). Fifteen pregnancies complicated by hypertensive disorders had higher frequency of CV risk factors (86.7% vs 38.2%, P = 0.005), triple aPL positivity (26.7% vs 8.5%, P = 0.045), corticosteroid (CCS) treatment during pregnancy (100% vs 76.4%, P = 0.046), and higher SLEPDAI during the second trimester (3.0 [0.0-13.0] vs 2.0 [0.0-6.0], P = 0.01).

Variations of C3 and C4 levels during pregnancy. Figures 1 and 2 show C3 and C4 levels throughout pregnancy in (A) SLE pregnancies with and without flare and in (B) SLE pregnancies with and without obstetric complications. Complement levels in the GOP are shown in Supplementary Figure S1 (available with the online version of this article).7

C3 levels at different time points (preconception visit and each trimester of pregnancy) in (A) SLE pregnancies with and without flare and (B) SLE pregnancies with and without obstetric complications. Data are represented as median (box: 25-75 percentile; whiskers: 2.5-97.5 percentile). * Wilcoxon sign-rank test: P < 0.05. Mann-Whitney U test: § P < 0.05 (vs “without flare”); ✤ P < 0.05 (vs “without complications”). 1st: first trimester; 2nd: second trimester; 3rd: third trimester; Pre: preconception visit; SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

C3 levels at different time points (preconception visit and each trimester of pregnancy) in (A) SLE pregnancies with and without flare and (B) SLE pregnancies with and without obstetric complications. Data are represented as median (box: 25-75 percentile; whiskers: 2.5-97.5 percentile). * Wilcoxon sign-rank test: P < 0.05. Mann-Whitney U test: § P < 0.05 (vs “without flare”); ✤ P < 0.05 (vs “without complications”). 1st: first trimester; 2nd: second trimester; 3rd: third trimester; Pre: preconception visit; SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus.

C4 levels at different time points (preconception visit and each trimester of pregnancy) in (A) SLE pregnancies with and without flares and (B) SLE pregnancies with and without obstetric complications. Data are represented as median (box: 25-75 percentile; whiskers: 2.5-97.5 percentile). *Wilcoxon sign-rank test: P < 0.05. Mann-Whitney U test: § P < 0.05 (vs “without flare”); ✤ P < 0.05 (vs “without complications”). 1st: first trimester; 2nd: second trimester; 3rd: third trimester; Pre: preconception visit; SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

C4 levels at different time points (preconception visit and each trimester of pregnancy) in (A) SLE pregnancies with and without flares and (B) SLE pregnancies with and without obstetric complications. Data are represented as median (box: 25-75 percentile; whiskers: 2.5-97.5 percentile). *Wilcoxon sign-rank test: P < 0.05. Mann-Whitney U test: § P < 0.05 (vs “without flare”); ✤ P < 0.05 (vs “without complications”). 1st: first trimester; 2nd: second trimester; 3rd: third trimester; Pre: preconception visit; SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus.

In the GOP, C3 significantly increased throughout pregnancy and C4 increased from the first trimester to the second trimester. Similarly, in SLE pregnancies without flare or without obstetric complications, C3 significantly increased from the preconception period to the first trimester and throughout pregnancy and C4 increased from the preconception period to the second trimester. In the other SLE groups, complement levels showed different trends: no increase of C4 from preconception to the first trimester in SLE pregnancies with flare; no increase throughout pregnancy in SLE pregnancies with fetal losses or with severely preterm births; and no increase in the second and third trimesters in SLE pregnancies with hypertensive disorders (Figure 1 and Figure 2).

C3 and C4 levels: comparison between groups. In each trimester, C3 and C4 levels were higher in the GOP than that in each of the SLE pregnancy groups, including those without flares and without complications (Figure 1 and Figure 2; Supplementary Figure S1, available with the online version of this article).

In turn, SLE pregnancies without flares showed higher C3 and C4 levels than pregnancies with flares, at preconception and in each trimester (Figure 1A and Figure 2A).

SLE pregnancies without complications had higher C3 and C4 levels in the second trimester compared to pregnancies with fetal losses and showed higher C3 levels than the severely preterm birth group in each trimester, whereas higher C4 was observed only in the third trimester (Figure 1B and Figure 2B). There were no differences in C3 and C4 levels comparing pregnancies without obstetric complications and pregnancies with hypertensive disorders.

By comparing C3 and C4 levels in patients with or without CV risk factors, we found a higher level of C3 at the third trimester in the group with CV risk factors (113.0 [61.0-187.0] mg/dL vs 105.5 [55.3-157.2] mg/dL, P = 0.02).

Frequency of low levels of C3 and/or C4. At preconception, pregnancies with flare showed a higher frequency of low C3 and C4 compared with pregnancies without flares (Supplementary Table S4, available with the online version of this article). Using the range for normal values that was previously derived from healthy pregnancies,7 SLE pregnancies with flare had a higher frequency of low C4 in each trimester as compared with pregnancies without flares (Supplementary Table S4).

By comparing pregnancies with and without obstetric complications, only the preterm birth group showed, in the preconception period, a significantly higher rate of low C4 compared with uneventful pregnancies. No other differences were found throughout pregnancy (Supplementary Table S5, available with the online version of this article).

There was no difference in the frequency of CV risk factors between patients with low or normal complement levels at preconception (38.3% vs 46.7%, P = 0.29).

Multivariate analysis. In multivariate analysis (Table), low C4 at preconception was associated with flare during pregnancy (OR 13.81, 95% CI 3.10-61.43, P < 0.001).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table.

Predictors of flare during pregnancy in multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Due to the small number of obstetric complications, the multivariate analysis for their association with complement levels could not be performed.

DISCUSSION

Our study on a large series of SLE pregnancies shows that the physiological pattern of C3 and C4 variations during pregnancy is conserved in pregnancies without flare and/or obstetric complications. In fact, levels of C3 increase throughout pregnancy and levels of C4 until the second trimester in these pregnancies. However, it must be noted that C3 and C4 levels are consistently lower in SLE pregnancies compared with the GOP.7 The importance of our study is indeed the use of pregnancy-modified normal ranges for C3 and C4 levels.

Currently, as suggested by the current European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology recommendations on pregnancy in patients with SLE18 and ACR guidelines for the Management of Reproductive Health in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases,19 women are advised to start a pregnancy when the disease is in remission or in stable low disease activity. Accordingly, the large majority of patients in our study showed a very low disease activity at preconception evaluation. Therefore, flares were observed only in 12.2% of cases. Although this frequency is rather small, identifying predictors of flare during pregnancy may be relevant for clinical practice.

The lack of increase in C4 levels during the first trimester in SLE pregnancies with disease flares suggests that clinicians might use this variable as a way to predict this potential complication.

Moreover, multivariate analysis demonstrated that flares during pregnancy were independently associated with low C4 levels before pregnancy (OR 13.81), but, notably, not SLEDAI at that time, indicating that even in patients with low disease activity, the presence of reduced C4 should be carefully considered. This could reflect either a persistent serological activity in otherwise inactive disease or a genetic complement defect, which is not rare in SLE.6,20

The association of low C4 and disease flares is not surprising. Disease activation in patients with SLE is associated mainly with classical pathway activation, which yields a decrease in C4 (and C3) circulating levels and an increase in split products.6 In fact, measurements of C3 and C4 have been included not only in the classification criteria for SLE, but also in the disease activity indexes. As a whole, preconception C4 levels seem to be a good marker for predicting flares in SLE pregnancy.

The second issue addressed in our study is regarding SLE pregnancies with obstetric complications. We recorded that 19.1% of pregnancies had at least 1 obstetric complication; although these data are comparable with those reported in the PROMISSE study,14 the different nature of the 2 studies (retrospective and prospective) and the slightly different definitions used for the population and complications should be considered. Our data demonstrated that C3 and C4 levels failed to increase and remained stable throughout the pregnancy in patients with SLE suffering from fetal losses, as well as in those with severely preterm birth. Notably, fetal losses occurred more frequently in patients taking immunosuppressive drugs, potentially related to more severe disease. We did not find a significantly higher frequency of aPL positivity and/or APS diagnosis in pregnancies with fetal losses compared with pregnancies without complications. This could be due to the relatively low occurrence of this complication in our cohort and the fact that most of these pregnancies were treated with low-dose acetylsalicylic acid and/or low molecular weight heparin.

Our results confirm and reinforce the data from the PROMISSE study, which showed that SLE pregnancies with an adverse pregnancy outcome (ie, late miscarriages; neonatal death secondary to prematurity and/or placental insufficiency; preterm delivery or termination of pregnancy before the 36th gestational weeks due to hypertension, preeclampsia, or placental insufficiency; or SGA infants) had higher frequency of low C3 and/or C4 at baseline evaluation (up to the 12th gestational week) and lower increase of C3 during the second trimester than other SLE pregnancies.14 It should be noted, however, that in this study, women with potential causes of adverse pregnancy outcomes other than SLE (eg, high-dose CCSs, high serum creatinine, high blood pressure at screening, or diabetes) were excluded. On the contrary, patients with acquired CV risk factors were included in our study, thus better reflecting real-world experience. It is not surprising that a higher frequency of these risk factors was observed in the group of patients who had a pregnancy complicated by hypertensive disorders but without any association with low complement levels. Nevertheless, all the CV risk factors should be assessed during preconception counseling, given the multifactorial nature in the pathogenesis of pregnancy complications.

Finally, in patients with SLE with hypertensive disorders during pregnancy, C3 and C4 serum levels increased only between preconception and the first trimester, and remained stable thereafter, at variance with what happened in uncomplicated SLE pregnancies. Notably, it has been reported that women with early onset preeclampsia are more likely to carry deficiency in C4A or C4B, suggesting that C4 may play a role in the prevention of the onset of preeclampsia.6

Another strength of our work is the classification of obstetric complications according to their possible pathogenic mechanism. This enabled us to highlight the different effect of complement in different pathological situations.

One limitation of our study is its retrospective nature, which allowed only the analysis of data that were requested as per clinical practice. To better define the association between complement and complications in SLE pregnancies, a prospective collection of data and biological samples would be the best, as already performed in the PROMISSE study.10

In conclusion, our results suggest that C3 and C4 levels should be further investigated as possible predictors of maternal and fetal complications in SLE pregnancies, as they may reflect complement involvement at the placental level. In clinical practice, measuring C3 and C4 levels at preconception and in each trimester as well as observing their failure to increase throughout pregnancy might become a simple and inexpensive way to identify women at higher risk of complications.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

  • Accepted for publication March 8, 2023.
  • Copyright © 2023 by the Journal of Rheumatology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Bundhun PK,
    2. Soogund MZ,
    3. Huang F
    . Impact of systemic lupus erythematosus on maternal and fetal outcomes following pregnancy: a meta-analysis of studies published between years 2001-2016. J Autoimmun 2017;79:17-27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.
    1. Georgiou PE,
    2. Politi EN,
    3. Katsimbri P,
    4. Sakka V,
    5. Drosos AA
    . Outcome of lupus pregnancy: a controlled study. Rheumatology 2000;39:1014-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.
    1. Clowse ME,
    2. Jamison M,
    3. Myers E,
    4. James AH
    . A national study of the complications of lupus in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:127.e1-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Al Arfaj AS,
    2. Khalil N
    . Pregnancy outcome in 396 pregnancies in patients with SLE in Saudi Arabia. Lupus 2010;19:1665-73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Cortés-Hernández J,
    2. Ordi-Ros J,
    3. Paredes F,
    4. Casellas M,
    5. Castillo F,
    6. Vilardell-Tarres M
    . Clinical predictors of fetal and maternal outcome in systemic lupus erythematosus: a prospective study of 103 pregnancies. Rheumatology 2002;41:643-50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Chighizola CB,
    2. Lonati PA,
    3. Trespidi L,
    4. Meroni PL,
    5. Tedesco F
    . The complement system in the pathophysiology of pregnancy and in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases during pregnancy. Front Immunol 2020;11:2084.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Reggia R,
    2. Ziglioli T,
    3. Andreoli L, et al.
    Primary anti-phospholipid syndrome: any role for serum complement levels in predicting pregnancy complications? Rheumatology 2012;51:2186-90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Lynch AM,
    2. Salmon JE
    . Dysregulated complement activation as a common pathway of injury in preeclampsia and other pregnancy complications. Placenta 2010;31:561-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.
    1. Teirilä L,
    2. Heikkinen-Eloranta J,
    3. Kotimaa J,
    4. Meri S,
    5. Lokki AI
    . Regulation of the complement system and immunological tolerance in pregnancy. Semin Immunol 2019;45:101337.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Kim MY,
    2. Guerra MM,
    3. Kaplowitz E, et al.
    Complement activation predicts adverse pregnancy outcome in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and/or antiphospholipid antibodies. Ann Rheum Dis 2018;77:549-55.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Ho A,
    2. Barr SG,
    3. Magder LS,
    4. Petri M
    . A decrease in complement is associated with increased renal and hematologic activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 44:2350-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Buyon JP,
    2. Kim MY,
    3. Guerra MM, et al.
    Kidney outcomes and risk factors for nephritis (flare/de novo) in a multiethnic cohort of pregnant patients with lupus. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2017; 12:940-6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Wu J,
    2. Zhang WH,
    3. Ma J,
    4. Bao C,
    5. Liu J,
    6. Di W
    . Prediction of fetal loss in Chinese pregnant patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2019;9:e023849.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Buyon JP,
    2. Kim MY,
    3. Guerra MM, et al.
    Predictors of pregnancy outcomes in patients with lupus: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2015;163:153-63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Hochberg MC
    . Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1997;40:1725.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Petri M,
    2. Orbai AM,
    3. Alarcón GS, et al.
    Derivation and validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:2677-86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Buyon JP,
    2. Kalunian KC,
    3. Ramsey-Goldman R, et al.
    Assessing disease activity in SLE patients during pregnancy. Lupus 1999;8:677-84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Andreoli L,
    2. Bertsias GK,
    3. Agmon-Levin N, et al.
    EULAR recommendations for women’s health and the management of family planning, assisted reproduction, pregnancy and menopause in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and/or antiphospholipid syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:476-85.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Sammaritano LR,
    2. Bermas BL,
    3. Chakravarty EE, et al.
    2020 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Management of Reproductive Health in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020;72:529-56.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Chen JY,
    2. Wu YL,
    3. Mok MY, et al.
    Effects of complement C4 gene copy number variations, size dichotomy, and C4A deficiency on genetic risk and clinical presentation of systemic lupus erythematosus in East Asian populations. Arthritis Rheumatol 2016;68:1442-53.
    OpenUrl

ONLINE SUPPLEMENT

Supplementary material accompanies the online version of this article.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 50, Issue 10
1 Oct 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Variations of C3 and C4 Before and During Pregnancy in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Association With Disease Flares and Obstetric Outcomes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Variations of C3 and C4 Before and During Pregnancy in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Association With Disease Flares and Obstetric Outcomes
Francesca Crisafulli, Laura Andreoli, Dina Zucchi, Rossella Reggia, Maria C. Gerardi, Daniele Lini, Chiara Tani, Sonia Zatti, Franco Franceschini, Marta Mosca, Angela Tincani
The Journal of Rheumatology Oct 2023, 50 (10) 1296-1301; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2022-1135

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Variations of C3 and C4 Before and During Pregnancy in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Association With Disease Flares and Obstetric Outcomes
Francesca Crisafulli, Laura Andreoli, Dina Zucchi, Rossella Reggia, Maria C. Gerardi, Daniele Lini, Chiara Tani, Sonia Zatti, Franco Franceschini, Marta Mosca, Angela Tincani
The Journal of Rheumatology Oct 2023, 50 (10) 1296-1301; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2022-1135
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo  logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  •  logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
    • ONLINE SUPPLEMENT
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Keywords

complement C3
complement C4
PREGNANCY
SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Association of Daily Glucocorticoid Dose With Worse Patient-Reported Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Data From the Almenara Lupus Cohort
  • Differences in Self-Reported Medication Nonadherence and Its Drivers in Young Adults Versus Older Adults With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Perceived and Objective Physical Function in 2 United States Population-Based Cohorts of Adults With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Show more Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • complement C3
  • complement C4
  • pregnancy
  • systemic lupus erythematosus

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2025 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire